On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 03:30:14PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg said: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 > Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700 > > "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >-) clamd > > > > + clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf > > > > > > > Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for me in the > > > history of clamav > > > > Oh, I'm responsible for that change.. > > > > > Tomasz, can you please make future changes to clamav > > > backward-compatible? In this case, renaming my clamav.conf to > > > > Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming > > was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are > > simply too lazy to add, activate, or tune new options without such > > dramatic changes. > > In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for packager's > of ClamAV (e.g. Debian) unnecessarily hard.
I am all for the changes (just something else on my list each release - life as usual :). What would help me is a single succint document that lists critical stuff like this for packagers (maybe NewStuff, to follow exim's example?). I do read the Changelog, and try to keep abreast of CVS, but some of the changes weren't even in CVS (clamd.conf, IIRC) and did take me by surprise. I am still pondering how best to mess with people's config files without upsetting anyone :) ClamAV/Debian users - now's your chance to pick the defaults from the new options. Any one want anything/hate anything strongly, please write me (off list) and let me know. Thanks everybody for your hard work, -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | You never gain something but that you | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | lose something. -- Thoreau | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgpZE6fgnxzcr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
