On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:08:21 +0100
Vladimir Orlando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i'm new.
> My name's Vlad.
> I'm writing to you because i've a problem compiling mod_clamav.
Hello Vlad,
> checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
> checking for cl_scanfile in -lclamav... no
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 at 19:37:33 -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Devin Atencio wrote:
>
> >I am currently using ClamAV 0.65 and I have noticed that several people
> >Who have been trying to send random files through the server get blocked.
> >Is there an option I can specify in the clamav.conf so t
Hi,
Devin Atencio wrote:
I am currently using ClamAV 0.65 and I have noticed that several people
Who have been trying to send random files through the server get blocked.
Is there an option I can specify in the clamav.conf so that it doesn't block
Files in any way of being sent to the user especi
I am currently using ClamAV 0.65 and I have noticed that several people
Who have been trying to send random files through the server get blocked.
Is there an option I can specify in the clamav.conf so that it doesn't block
Files in any way of being sent to the user especially files like .jpg, or
.
Title: unsubscribe hackpch
Robin Lynn Frank said:
> Well, there goes that idea. The reason I asked is that if we have to
> take the server down for any reason, there can be a lot of mail from
> our backup that has to be processed when we are back up. We have a
> script that invokes clamscan to scan mail as it arrives an
Robin Lynn Frank said:
> Well, there goes that idea. The reason I asked is that if we have to
> take the server down for any reason, there can be a lot of mail from
> our backup that has to be processed when we are back up. We have a
> script that invokes clamscan to scan mail as it arrives an
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 at 10:55:41 -0800, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> On Thursday 15 January 2004 09:33, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 at 9:08:11 -0800, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> > > No this is not spam. My question is does anyone know the smallest size
> > > for virus/trojan/worm pay
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:45:20 + (GMT)
Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > >
> > > Your patch is incorrect. It will always be true for threads that
> > > are currently in use and they will instantly be killed.
> >
> > I disagree. The patch does the
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 at 9:08:11 -0800, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> No this is not spam. My question is does anyone know the smallest size for
> virus/trojan/worm payload around? We scan incoming mail and I am looking for
> a way to reduce resource useage by setting a lower limit on what is scanne
>No this is not spam. My question is does anyone know the
>smallest size for
>virus/trojan/worm payload around? We scan incoming mail and I
>am looking for
>a way to reduce resource useage by setting a lower limit on
>what is scanned..
That might be a bad idea. Consider the case of someone
Nigel Horne wrote:
FREE-BSD 4.4-RELEASE
I only have 4.7 and 4.8 (4.4 is rather old now) so I can't
be 100% sure this will work for you.
I suggest downloading the latest sendmail source from sendmail.org,
cd to libmilter and doing 'make install' there. Report back here how it goes,
it isn't as daun
Quoting Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Your patch is incorrect. It will always be true for threads that are
> > currently in use and they will instantly be killed.
>
> I disagree. The patch does the same thing that yours.
>
You patched a different line of code, so the argument is moo
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:37:56 + (GMT)
Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Oh, you're right - there was no chance to disable the timeout
> > (however clamav.conf states that 0 disables the limit). It's even
> > better to use:
> >
> > if(timeout &
Ing. Germa'n Gonza'lez B. wrote:
This is my old logs.
Have you installed the milter SDK yet? As I said, the milter won't build without that.
-Nigel
You dont't have installed sendmail with milter support. Your log shows
checking whether setpgrp takes no argument... no
checking libmilter/mfapi.h u
Quoting Philipp Grosswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > LinuxThreads are based on processes - the three processes
> > are: the main thread of clamd, threadwatcher (from clamd) and
> > thread-manager (always spawned by LinuxThreads).
>
> So it is correct to only use gdb with the first process (main
>
> > This is my old logs.
>
> Have you installed the milter SDK yet? As I said, the milter won't build without
> that.
>
> -Nigel
>
>
You dont't have installed sendmail with milter support. Your log shows
checking whether setpgrp takes no argument... no
checking libmilter/mfapi.h usability
> LinuxThreads are based on processes - the three processes
> are: the main thread of clamd, threadwatcher (from clamd) and
> thread-manager (always spawned by LinuxThreads).
So it is correct to only use gdb with the first process (main thread of
clamd)? Or is it necessary to also include backtr
Quoting Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oh, you're right - there was no chance to disable the timeout (however
> clamav.conf states that 0 disables the limit). It's even better to use:
>
> if(timeout && ths[i].active)
>
> instead of
>
> if(timeout && (time(NULL) - ths[i].start > timeout))
>
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:27:16 + (GMT)
Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Philipp Grosswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > Timed out after 3 seconds! Thats not right.
> > >
> > > A quick look at the code, and it seems that the thread
> > > timeout code isn't correct.
> > >
> > > It
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:32:56 +0100
"Philipp Grosswiler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> trog,
>
> I could finally manage to get the backtrace you requested... clamd now
> fails almost every 6 hours. here is what I got:
Thank you for the backtrace.
> I hope it is useful to you. I still don't know w
Hi, i'm new.
My name's Vlad.
I'm writing to you because i've a problem compiling mod_clamav.
I've just installed clamav following instruction, infact it's up and
running.
I've apache 2 up and running, but when i compile mod_clamav it returns
me an error.
this is command:
./configure --with-apxs
> Do:
>
> cd /clamav-0.65/clamd
> patch -p0 < /path/to/clamd.timeout.patch
>
> and in clamav.conf set this:
>
> ThreadTimeout 0
Thank you for the patch, I will apply it and re-compile clamd.
I also saw in the log file, that whenever clamd crashes, the last line
logged is something like this:
Quoting Philipp Grosswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Timed out after 3 seconds! Thats not right.
> >
> > A quick look at the code, and it seems that the thread
> > timeout code isn't correct.
> >
> > It is also possible that there is a mutex locking bug in clamd.
>
> Could this be the cause of
Quoting Philipp Grosswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> trog,
>
> I could finally manage to get the backtrace you requested... clamd now
> fails
> almost every 6 hours. here is what I got:
>
Thanks.
>
> I hope it is useful to you. I still don't know why there are actually 3
> PIDs
> for clamd. Co
trog,
I could finally manage to get the backtrace you requested... clamd now fails
almost every 6 hours. here is what I got:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x40093b94 in __pthread_sigsuspend () from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x400939d8 in __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal () from
/lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
#2
On Thursday 15 Jan 2004 11:32 am, EyedMax wrote:
> FREE-BSD 4.4-RELEASE
I only have 4.7 and 4.8 (4.4 is rather old now) so I can't
be 100% sure this will work for you.
I suggest downloading the latest sendmail source from sendmail.org,
cd to libmilter and doing 'make install' there. Report back
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Thursday 15 Jan 2004 10:36 am, EyedMax wrote:
How can I do it?
That depends on the operating system you are using.
FREE-BSD 4.4-RELEASE
--
//EyedMax
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is
Quoting Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:49:22 + (GMT)
> Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] gale]$ clamdscan .
> > /home/gale/./.mozilla/default/5bc4ycs6.slt/Cache/_CACHE_002_:
> > Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
> > Session(0): Time out ERROR
> >
> >
Quoting Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:49:22 + (GMT)
> Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] gale]$ clamdscan .
> > /home/gale/./.mozilla/default/5bc4ycs6.slt/Cache/_CACHE_002_:
> > Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
> > Session(0): Time out ERROR
> >
> >
On Thursday 15 Jan 2004 10:36 am, EyedMax wrote:
> How can I do it?
That depends on the operating system you are using.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
-
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:49:22 + (GMT)
Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] gale]$ clamdscan .
> /home/gale/./.mozilla/default/5bc4ycs6.slt/Cache/_CACHE_002_:
> Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
> Session(0): Time out ERROR
>
> Timed out after 3 seconds! Thats not right.
There was a ra
Nigel Horne wrote:
This is my old logs.
Have you installed the milter SDK yet? As I said, the milter won't build without that.
-Nigel
How can I do it?
--
//EyedMax
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast S
On Thursday 15 January 2004 9:55 am, vlad wrote:
> # clamscan -v -r --mbox /var/virusmails/
> /var/virusmails//virus-20040114-185021-24369-10: Worm.Gibe.F FOUND
> /var/virusmails//virus-20040112-120601-15098-04: Worm.Mimail.J FOUND
> /var/virusmails//virus-20040115-141942-25682-04:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of vlad
> Sent: 15. januar 2004 10:55
> To: Trog
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] paypal trojan
>
> Hello Trog,
>
> Thursday, January 15, 2004, 2:23:33 PM, you wrote:
>
> T> Hi all,
>
> T> Ha
> clamd will be linked against libpthread, the command 'ldd
> /usr/local/sbin/clamd' should so this.
The command shows the following output:
libclamav.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1 (0x4001a000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x4003c000)
libbz2.so.1 => /usr/lib/libbz
Quoting vlad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> # more /var/virusmails/virus-20040113-120704-22122-02
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: virus-quarantine
> X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Envelope-From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Quarantine-id:
> Received: from localhost (172-122.sta
On Thursday 15 Jan 2004 8:27 am, EyedMax wrote:
> This is my old logs.
Have you installed the milter SDK yet? As I said, the milter won't build without that.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.u
ils//virus-20040114-185021-24369-10: Worm.Gibe.F FOUND
/var/virusmails//virus-20040112-120601-15098-04: Worm.Mimail.J FOUND
/var/virusmails//virus-20040115-141942-25682-04: Worm.Gibe.F FOUND
/var/virusmails//virus-20040115-141944-25683-04: Worm.Gibe.F FOUND
/var/virusmails//virus-20040114-195750-29402-06: Worm.
Quoting Philipp Grosswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OK, clamd already crashed once again, and now I was trying to follow
> your
> guide...
>
> > (I'm going to assume you're clamd is multithreaded. If not
> > just do steps 1-3 followed by the command 'bt').
>
> I think so, how can I tell?
clamd w
Quoting "Jon R. Kibler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello:
>
> Running:
> Solaris 9
> Clavav 0.65
>
> We are having problems getting clamdscan to work.
>
> The problem is file permissions. The file being scanned must be either
> other readable, or it must belong to the clamav user or group. We
Hi all,
Have submitted a sample of an email message doing the rounds purporting to be
from paypal and containing a zip file with an executable in it.
Kaspersky identified the message as:
paypal.exe Packed: UPX
paypal.zip/paypal.exe Infected: TrojanDownloader.Win32.Small.cz
Clam doesn't recongni
Ing. Germán González B. wrote:
I can't compile clamav-milter on my FREE-BSD 4.4-RELEASE system :(
Everything looks fine, except a few warnings about crypt, but no errors...
clamav-milter itself isn't appears after make.
Did you configure with --enable-milter option?
Regards
Yes.
I can recompile an
43 matches
Mail list logo
