>No this is not spam. My question is does anyone know the >smallest size for >virus/trojan/worm payload around? We scan incoming mail and I >am looking for >a way to reduce resource useage by setting a lower limit on >what is scanned..
That might be a bad idea. Consider the case of someone sending a message with an Outlook exploit that launches a connection to a server on the Internet to pull its payload. The exploit + url could be very small. Also, simply including "this is not spam" might increase your score in a Bayesian analysis. :) --J(K) ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
