Assuming you use recent clamav version (preferable devel), compile
clamav with default settings for clamav user, and your database
directory is /usr/local/share/clamav, try
chown -R clamav /usr/local/share/clamav
Newer versions of freshclam will automatically switch to clamav user, or
the user
Hi,
On one machine where I had forgotten to update the database for 2
months, I am getting and error,
# freshclam
Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav
Checking for a new database - started at Fri Jan 9 08:30:45 2004
Connected to clamav.elektrapro.com.
Reading md5 sum (viruses.md5): OK
R
that caught me off guard didn't know what was happening till i really
thought bout it well thanks for the update
btw great virus scanner and thanks for your time :)
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 16:32, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 21:45:47 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > On 08 Jan 2004 1
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 21:45:47 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On 08 Jan 2004 14:40:42 -0500
> mantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > also i know this might not be clamav problem but was searching through
> > the logs and found this and thats when it started
> > Jan 7 21:08:07 filter2 X-Qmail-Scann
Sorry my bad it really was a qmail-scanner problem.
After that big update to the virus database the scanner supposedly
pooped and needed more memory so what i did is update the setting from
20 megs to 40 megs in the softlimit seems to fine now. Sorry for that
panic
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:07, Tom
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:47:09 -0600
Paul Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been running clamd (0.65) through exiscan (exim 4.24) on a RH 9.0
> box. I'm also running RAV as a system filter until my subscription
> runs out.
>
> Clamd has been catching everything before it gets to RAV exce
on my last reload...
SelfCheck: Database modification detected. Forcing reload.
Reading databases from /usr/local/share/clamav
Database correctly reloaded (29930 viruses)
$ clamd -V
clamd / ClamAV version 0.65
4.9-RC FreeBSD 4.9-RC #1
on another server...
Verbose logging activated.
Reading data
On 08 Jan 2004 14:40:42 -0500
mantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> freebsd 4.9 clamav 0.65
> might not notice if your just scanning it regularly
>
> also i know this might not be clamav problem but was searching through
> the logs and found this and thats when it started
> Jan 7 21:08:07 filter2
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:40, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> I think this happens everytime somebody updates an old installation that
> used the *.db file to the new *.cvd format without deleting the old
> files. clamd then somehow reports the sum of the signatures in these
> files(!).
That's exa
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 19:25:36 +, Antony Stone wrote:
Clamscan's working fine for me here (Linux 2.4.23, ClamAV 0.60, with the big
database update just released, therefore 27645 signatures).
27645? How come? The database at the moment contains 19799 signatures.
I thi
On Thursday 08 January 2004 8:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tomasz,
>
> On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:07, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> > 27645? How come? The database at the moment contains 19799 signatures.
>
> Here's what I'm seeing on (on 2 different linux/ia32 machines):
>
> Thu Jan 8 06:14:11 2004
On Thursday 08 January 2004 8:16 pm, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2004 8:07 pm, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 19:25:36 +, Antony Stone wrote:
> > > Clamscan's working fine for me here (Linux 2.4.23, ClamAV 0.60, with
> > > the big database update just release
Tomasz,
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:07, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> 27645? How come? The database at the moment contains 19799 signatures.
Here's what I'm seeing on (on 2 different linux/ia32 machines):
Server1:
SNIP
$ grep -Ei 'protecting|reloaded' clamd.log
Sun Jan 4 07:37:29 2004 -> Protec
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 13:47:09 -0600, Paul Carpenter wrote:
> I've been running clamd (0.65) through exiscan (exim 4.24) on a RH 9.0 box.
> I'm also running RAV as a system filter until my subscription runs out.
>
> Clamd has been catching everything before it gets to RAV except for Mimail. I
On Thursday 08 January 2004 8:07 pm, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 19:25:36 +, Antony Stone wrote:
> > Clamscan's working fine for me here (Linux 2.4.23, ClamAV 0.60, with the
> > big database update just released, therefore 27645 signatures).
>
> 27645? How come? The database
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 19:25:36 +, Antony Stone wrote:
>
> Clamscan's working fine for me here (Linux 2.4.23, ClamAV 0.60, with the big
> database update just released, therefore 27645 signatures).
27645? How come? The database at the moment contains 19799 signatures.
--
Tomasz Papszun
I've been running clamd (0.65) through exiscan (exim 4.24) on a RH 9.0 box.
I'm also running RAV as a system filter until my subscription runs out.
Clamd has been catching everything before it gets to RAV except for Mimail. I
looked at the archives and made sure I had ScanArchive active. I d
freebsd 4.9 clamav 0.65
might not notice if your just scanning it regularly
also i know this might not be clamav problem but was searching through
the logs and found this and thats when it started
Jan 7 21:08:07 filter2 X-Qmail-Scanner-1.20:
[filter2107352768646113762] clamscan: corrupt or unknow
On Thursday 08 January 2004 7:17 pm, mantor wrote:
> Jan 8 13:29:31 filter2 /kernel: pid 63342 (clamscan), uid 1003: exited
> on signal 11 (core dumped)
>
> that happend today dont know what going on but i uninstalled clamscan
> reinstalled then it started working again but after i manually updat
Jan 8 13:29:31 filter2 /kernel: pid 63342 (clamscan), uid 1003: exited
on
signal 11 (core dumped)
Jan 8 13:35:16 filter2 /kernel: pid 63603 (clamscan), uid 1003: exited
on
signal 11 (core dumped)
Jan 8 13:35:21 filter2 /kernel: pid 63611 (clamscan), uid 1003: exited
on
signal 11 (core dumped)
Ah, it's as simple as using --enable-debug when compiling. Cool
What do the different debug levels log? I see that level 9 logs quite a bit
:) Specifically what log level only logs errors?
When enabling debug is there an option to direct the output to syslog?
-Troy
- Original Message
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:38:37AM +0100, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
>
> In case someone is interested, I'm including here test results of
> a set:
> Postfix + Amavisd-new (20030616p5-6) + ClamAV (0.60+BugFixesFromCVS-20030916).
>
> >From the 1st group of tests on www.antivirus.org, only 1 of 15 test
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 15:35:43 +, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2004 3:26 pm, Steven King wrote:
>
> > There are places on the web where virus information
> > can be obtained. For example, Google came up with
> > http://www.f-secure.com/virus-info/wild.html. No doubt
> > htere
On Thursday 08 January 2004 3:26 pm, Steven King wrote:
> Hello
>
> There are places on the web where virus information
> can be obtained. For example, Google came up with
> http://www.f-secure.com/virus-info/wild.html. No doubt
> htere are others.
True, there are plenty of such resources around;
Hello
There are places on the web where virus information
can be obtained. For example, Google came up with
http://www.f-secure.com/virus-info/wild.html. No doubt
htere are others.
Steve
=
Yahoo! Messenger - Communic
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 04:11, Cedric Foll wrote:
> I just have a little pb with it. It's about how you find your path at
> the start of the file.
> I get the folowing error:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# /usr/local/bin/clamdwatch.pl
> Clamd is in an unknown state.
> It returned: /usr/local/bin/usr/local
On Thursday 08 January 2004 12:21 pm, Payal Rathod wrote:
> Hi all,
> Recently I noticed that Norton AV clears more than 60,000 viruses,
> maybe other virus scanners also have similar numbers, why do we have a
> very less number?
Two main reasons:
1. ClamAV has a high proportion of recent viruse
Hi all,
Recently I noticed that Norton AV clears more than 60,000 viruses,
maybe other virus scanners also have similar numbers, why do we have a
very less number? Is it because we do not have big database or we
protect against new viruses only and keep new definition updated?
I personally had no p
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:24:57 +0530
Dilip M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this common with Clam-AV or am i need take care of some things in
> Clam-AV ?
Please read the last post from Tomasz Papszun !
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ClamAV.net
Hi all,
Hope some guys in grp are NOT fed up from my mails :(( If so i'm
apolozise.
Yday i had a problem of Clam-AV not detecting viruses sent from
http://www.testvirus.org/
===
Problem was with /etc/clam.conf
#Clamuk
On Thursday 08 January 2004 10:47 am, Alex Pleiner wrote:
> * Philipp Grosswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-07
18:42]:
> > I am wondering if there exists any descriptions of the viruses found by
> > ClamAV, similary to McAfee/Symantec/...
> >
> > Many of my customers would like to find out more
Would it at least be possible to have a reference or alias to other online
resources (e.g. McAfee's Virus Information Library)?
For example, if I am searching for the virus "Worm.Gibe.F" on the McAfee
Virus Information Library there are no matches found. It would be nice if I
could use the alias t
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:47:44 +0100
Alex Pleiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does that exist in some way or could this be done?
>
> AFAIK it does not exist. I asked for the same some months ago and got
> no answer. I would appreciate an online virus desciption database and
> am more then willing
* Philipp Grosswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-07 18:42]:
> I am wondering if there exists any descriptions of the viruses found by
> ClamAV, similary to McAfee/Symantec/...
> Many of my customers would like to find out more about the virus they got
> and how they could protect themselves, and
Le mer 07/01/2004 à 20:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:59, Power-Netz (Schwarz) wrote:
> > Your script code does work, but does not recognize the crashed child :-(
> > The parent task seems to life and answere the PING , but the actual
> > used child does no longer react.
On Thursday 08 Jan 2004 2:01 am, Internet Helpdesk wrote:
> At any rate, is there way to make clamav-milter produce a log or at least
> produce some output on the terminal screen? The man page for clamav-milter
> mentions a -x or --debug-level but these options are not recognized.
They are recog
On Thursday 08 Jan 2004 7:48 am, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> We need more information (version numbers, logs, configuration
> details)..
And operating systems that this appears on.
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Kojm
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#2025
Hello Daniel,
On 07.01.04, you wrote:
> every few hours, which is obviously unacceptable. Is there any known solutoin
> to a problem like this (other than setting up scripts to restart it every
No, when you view the archives of the list from app 30 hours ago, you will find
enough code and links
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:57:18 +1000
Daniel Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running clamd on two production mail servers, and it seems to lock
> up fairly regularly for reasons unknown to me. On one server it only
We need more information (version numbers, logs, configuration
deta
39 matches
Mail list logo
