Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-07-15T19:17:36-07:00
New Revision: 5bb3492892f0e087249d6e7aa9c077b9aa0922eb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5bb3492892f0e087249d6e7aa9c077b9aa0922eb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5bb3492892f0e087249d6e7aa9c077b9aa0922eb.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98849
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -905,6 +912,7 @@ void Preprocessor::Lex(Token &Result) {
// This token is injected to represent the translation of '#include "a.h"'
// into "import a.h;". Mimic the notional ';'.
case tok::annot_module_include:
+case tok::annot_repl_input_end:
---
owenca wrote:
This patch doesn't seem to work with the last two examples in #79487:
```
$ cat foo.cc
template
concept my_concept =
std::is_object_v
&& std::is_const_v
&& std::default_initializable;
std::uint32_t a =
byte_buffer[0]
| byte_buffer[1] << 8
| byte_buffer[
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/1430
Here is the relevant pie
yetingk wrote:
> AFAIK LLD doesn't support Zicfilp yet, which I feel is a prerequisite to
> marking it as non-experimental
I think we also not support Zicfiss to compiler-rt/libunwind, I think both of
them are still experimental now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98891
___
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
I am going to land this in later of the week if no objections come. As 19.x is
going to be branched.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5
"ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/1438
Here is the relevant
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 commented:
Thanks. Can you add a test for this under (clang/test/Driver) and add new
subsection for it in StandardCPlusPlusModules.rst ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
https://github.com/BeMg edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 47f8b85b3d81ed3578cb3b8f80d69ce307e0c883
8daa27a9d45b85a55f180e5f84ae9b7fa8c11572 --e
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-07-16T04:49:05+02:00
New Revision: f30c09e2d3107e117faf8311c6d8642fa95680af
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f30c09e2d3107e117faf8311c6d8642fa95680af
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f30c09e2d3107e117faf8311c6d8642fa95680af.diff
LO
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve-vla`
running on `linaro-g3-04` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/17/builds/869
Here is the relevant piece of the b
guijiyang wrote:
> @Arthapz @guijiyang thanks for reporting. But could you try to give feedbacks
> to that repo instead of this page. I feel this page it too long now. (My
> browser needs seconds to load it). And this page is indeed not a good place
> to track that.
>
> @guijiyang it looks li
Author: Shengchen Kan
Date: 2024-07-16T10:59:12+08:00
New Revision: d82c75ebc0483971b768dd5ff077789262ffd9c0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d82c75ebc0483971b768dd5ff077789262ffd9c0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d82c75ebc0483971b768dd5ff077789262ffd9c0.diff
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > @Arthapz @guijiyang thanks for reporting. But could you try to give
> > feedbacks to that repo instead of this page. I feel this page it too long
> > now. (My browser needs seconds to load it). And this page is indeed not a
> > good place to track that.
> > @guijiyang it
https://github.com/yetingk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98891
>From 98002027bc0a1d4b9bb3d11f7a9bbb5717a81b49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeting Kuo
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:51:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV] Bump the version of Zicfilp/Zicfiss to 1.0
Both of them are
https://github.com/yetingk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98891
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yetingk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98891
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yetingk wrote:
Since both of them should be experimental now, the latest commit I didn't
remove the experimental for them. Hence, I didn't change
`llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98891
___
cfe-commits mailing li
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64be-linux-test-suite` running on `ppc64be-clang-test-suite` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/176/buil
MaxEW707 wrote:
@Endilll Wondering if this PR gets the green check from you.
I would like to get this merged before the clang-19 branch is created and just
want to get the green light from a more senior member of the community before
merging. Thanks :).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+//===- ModulesBuilder.h --*-
C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ class Checker {
ClangdLSPServer::Options Opts;
// from buildCommand
tooling::CompileCommand Cmd;
+ std::unique_ptr BaseCDB;
+ std::unique_ptr CDB;
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
_
@@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
+//===- ModulesBuilder.cpp *-
C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,347 @@
+//===- ModulesBuilder.cpp *-
C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
+//===- ModulesBuilder.cpp *-
C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/yetingk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98891
>From 98002027bc0a1d4b9bb3d11f7a9bbb5717a81b49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeting Kuo
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:51:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Bump the version of Zicfilp/Zicfiss to 1.0
Both of them
https://github.com/yetingk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98891
>From be805db6c259d255b2ad3f0811bd1428bc8628c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeting Kuo
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:51:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Bump the version of Zicfilp/Zicfiss to 1.0
Both of them
yetingk wrote:
> > Since both of them should be experimental now, the pr is only change the
> > version of them now. Hence, I didn't change `llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`.
>
> Still need to note the version number change
Updated and rebase to fix conflicts.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct TransferrableTargetInfo {
unsigned short SuitableAlign;
unsigned short NewAlign;
unsigned MaxVectorAlign;
phoebewang wrote:
Right, sorry for the misleading. We still need to turn it to sret when vector
size > 2^14. Then why yo
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2024-07-16T04:59:51+01:00
New Revision: 4497ec293a6e745be817dc88027169bd5e4f7246
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4497ec293a6e745be817dc88027169bd5e4f7246
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4497ec293a6e745be817dc88027169bd5e4f7246.diff
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96422
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
It seems that this patch implements the new option without regard to the
relative precedence of the binary operators:
```
$ cat bar.cc
f1 = f2 * f3 +
f4 / f5 - f6;
$ clang-format -style='{BinPa
Michael137 wrote:
Closing in favour of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96422
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+
+set(CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS "-lclang_rt.builtins-hexagon -nostdlib" CACHE
STRING "")
+set(CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-lclang_rt.builtins-hexagon -nostdlib" CACHE
STRING "")
androm3da wrote:
The first failure encountered when I remove these is
https://github.com/vfdff created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98990
None
>From 3d22c4c31d360a45de83593e25a9352c16845414 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhongyunde
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:02:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [test] Check whether timeout exists in the Windows operating
sys
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Allen (vfdff)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98990.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (added) clang/test/CodeGen/math-libcalls-tbaa.cpp (+33)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/math-libcalls-tbaa.
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98758
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
Finally, I decide to revert #95660 and close this PR for now.
Regarding issues associated with #95660, I realized they are actually part of a
bigger problem in constant evaluation. As discussed in #59966, it might be
beneficial to implement on-demand template instantiation for c
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+// The test may fail as time out on windows
+// REQUIRES: system-linux
+
+// RUN: %clang -S -O3 -emit-llvm -o - -x c++ %s | FileCheck %s
-check-prefixes=CHECK,
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98991
Unfortunately, this has caused a regression in DeduceReturnType(), which causes
a problem in that some of the local recursive lambdas are getting incorrectly
rejected.
This reverts commit 5548ea34341e9d0ae64571
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
Unfortunately, this has caused a regression in DeduceReturnType(), which causes
a problem in that some of the local recursive lambdas are getting incorrectly
rejected.
This reverts commit 5548ea34341e9d0ae6
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98991
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98896
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-07-16T07:18:04+02:00
New Revision: 655c2233b6f81cd981d87e461ea202c563e90490
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/655c2233b6f81cd981d87e461ea202c563e90490
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/655c2233b6f81cd981d87e461ea202c563e90490.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98896
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-07-16T07:24:08+02:00
New Revision: ff96ad84f52022af295d11749f106480e7292a89
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ff96ad84f52022af295d11749f106480e7292a89
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ff96ad84f52022af295d11749f106480e7292a89.diff
LO
https://github.com/yetingk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98891
>From be805db6c259d255b2ad3f0811bd1428bc8628c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeting Kuo
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:51:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Bump the version of Zicfilp/Zicfiss to 1.0
Both of them
@@ -2538,6 +2541,311 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+namespace {
+
+struct PaddingClearer {
+ PaddingClearer(CodeGenFunction &F)
+ : CGF(F), CharWidth(CGF.getContext().ge
@@ -2538,6 +2541,311 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+namespace {
+
+struct PaddingClearer {
+ PaddingClearer(CodeGenFunction &F)
+ : CGF(F), CharWidth(CGF.getContext().ge
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
Bitfield load and store operations should be done using the same offset/size we
normally use to access the bitfield; unconditionally using byte load/store
operations will impair optimizations/performance. I guess this might not be
possible when unio
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704
>From 1b8503202474c15aa46fc4cc9151003a8d3ca336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:09:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC
---
clang/test/C
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97679
>From b5e0335199541225a1b0eb5eaf661cd4df55dbd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:14:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang-doc] add enum test
---
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-d
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-07-16T08:28:51+02:00
New Revision: d8f0611acc2658ccc54d985044aa115716c6ad34
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d8f0611acc2658ccc54d985044aa115716c6ad34
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d8f0611acc2658ccc54d985044aa115716c6ad34.diff
LO
cor3ntin wrote:
> Regarding issues associated with
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95660, I realized they are actually
> part of a bigger problem in constant evaluation. As discussed in
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59966, it might be beneficial to
> implement on-d
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct TransferrableTargetInfo {
unsigned short SuitableAlign;
unsigned short NewAlign;
unsigned MaxVectorAlign;
Fznamznon wrote:
Because `MaxVectorAlign` is set to a smaller value for some x86 targets -
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
This seems like the best course of action for now... sorry!
Thanks for the PR and the work on these issues
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98991
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@
@@ -512,24 +512,31 @@ namespace LambdaInDefaultMemberInitializer {
}
#if __cplusplus >= 201703L
-namespace GH35052 {
-template constexpr int func(F f) {
- if constexpr (f(1UL)) {
-return 1;
+namespace local_recursive_lambda {
+
+template struct recursive_lambda {
+ t
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98991
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yeting Kuo
Date: 2024-07-16T14:38:08+08:00
New Revision: 58c7df90f838251c3682abfe91abadaa68ff6a01
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58c7df90f838251c3682abfe91abadaa68ff6a01
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58c7df90f838251c3682abfe91abadaa68ff6a01.diff
LO
https://github.com/yetingk closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98891
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
BeMg wrote:
> > The proposal can be found at the
> > [riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc#48](https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/48).
>
> Please put this in the PR description
Updated PR description
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85786
_
goldsteinn wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91101
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97681
>From f9d5cc074e4b65a92703bd09e62696a29fed1237 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:31:13 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang-doc] add nested naemspace
---
.../test/clang-doc/name
@@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
+//===--- PrerequisiteModulesTests.cpp ---*- C++
+//-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifi
@@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
+//===--- PrerequisiteModulesTests.cpp ---*- C++
+//-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifi
@@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
+//===--- PrerequisiteModulesTests.cpp ---*- C++
+//-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifi
@@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
+//===--- PrerequisiteModulesTests.cpp ---*- C++
+//-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifi
@@ -51,6 +52,9 @@
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
+
+extern llvm::cl::opt ExperimentalModulesSupport;
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `openmp-s390x-linux`
running on `systemz-1` while building `clang` at step 6 "test-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/88/builds/912
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for
hokein wrote:
> @pranavk see #98613.
>
> edit: sorry, the error recovery that is currently performed will not detect
> cases where the template argument list does not contain a a type. i can look
> into this monday.
Some analysis:
given the example `this->StorageT` where `I` is an `int`, the
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-07-15T09:37:45+02:00
New Revision: 9ac2b8965264a7f20a3e07c913b25c375a080c0f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ac2b8965264a7f20a3e07c913b25c375a080c0f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ac2b8965264a7f20a3e07c913b25c375a080c0f.diff
LO
@@ -2711,6 +2711,8 @@ static void CollectArgsForIntegratedAssembler(Compilation
&C,
}
if (!UseRelaxRelocations)
CmdArgs.push_back("-mrelax-relocations=no");
+ if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_msse2avx))
+CmdArgs.push_back("-msse2avx");
KanRobert wrote
https://github.com/Fznamznon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91364
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct TransferrableTargetInfo {
unsigned short SuitableAlign;
unsigned short NewAlign;
unsigned MaxVectorAlign;
Fznamznon wrote:
`MaxVectorAlign` is set for x86 targets. I can use it as a limit as well, but
note that this patch also
Fznamznon wrote:
BTW, I think the limitation I'm hitting is introduced by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121898 .
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98629
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
https://github.com/Fznamznon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98629
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Fznamznon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98629
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sebastiankreutzer wrote:
> You might want to get approval from someone else - I'm not even remotely
> close to a maintainer here.
Will do - thanks for taking the time to review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/jthackray updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98698
>From b5d6146b583f96c7e8cec9abd2d2fec51dd4a611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Thackray
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:08:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64][RISCV] Document option --print-supported-extensio
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building
`clang,llvm` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/1975
Here is the rel
hokein wrote:
Summaries of changes after this patch:
1) for type template parameters and template template parameters, clang emits a
warning, which can be suppressed by `-Wno-missing-dependent-templat-keyword`
(after #98613);
2) for non-type template parameters, clang emits a hard `no_member`
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang,llvm` at step 10 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/1842
Here is t
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97679
>From b5e0335199541225a1b0eb5eaf661cd4df55dbd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:14:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-doc] add enum test
---
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-d
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97679
>From b5e0335199541225a1b0eb5eaf661cd4df55dbd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:14:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-doc] add enum test
---
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-d
dyung wrote:
@arsenm the previous two bot failure notifications are from your reapplication
of your changes, not from my original revert. Not sure why it is mentioning it
here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98851
___
cfe-commits mailing l
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97681
>From f9d5cc074e4b65a92703bd09e62696a29fed1237 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:31:13 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-doc] add nested naemspace
---
.../test/clang-doc/name
PeterChou1 wrote:
> I think this mostly looks good, but I am concerned with the line number
> matching. It appears that whenever you’ve up’s the file you’ve had to update
> all the line numbers.
>
> Is it feasible to rewrite some of the checks to use the “LINE” directive?
> Perhaps it also ma
https://github.com/ecnelises ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97524
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sebastiankreutzer wrote:
@petrhosek @MaskRay
Could one of you have a look to give final approval?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97679
>From b5e0335199541225a1b0eb5eaf661cd4df55dbd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:14:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang-doc] add enum test
---
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-d
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97679
>From b5e0335199541225a1b0eb5eaf661cd4df55dbd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:14:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-doc] add enum test
---
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-d
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97644
>From cbb9d73b4827206ea7f5da58cc4a765a9297d620 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:39:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-doc] add ftime trace
---
clang-tools-extra/clang-doc/
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97644
>From cbb9d73b4827206ea7f5da58cc4a765a9297d620 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:39:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-doc] add ftime trace
---
clang-tools-extra/clang-doc/
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98624
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto commented:
Thank you Marian for the patch.
I left some comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98624
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
101 - 200 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
