================ @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5 +// The test may fail as time out on windows +// REQUIRES: system-linux + +// RUN: %clang -S -O3 -emit-llvm -o - -x c++ %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=CHECK,NoNewStructPathTBAA +// RUN: %clang -S -O3 -Xclang -new-struct-path-tbaa -emit-llvm -o - -x c++ %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=CHECK,NewStructPathTBAA + ---------------- vfdff wrote:
Thanks @zahiraam very much. Yes, I expected tbaa metada at the call of expf with the PR. so this checking line don't include the tbaa metada because you have not rebuild the clang with the PR ? > CHECK-NEXT: [[CALL:%.*]] = tail call float @expf(float noundef [[TMP0]]) > #[[ATTR2:[0-9]+]] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
