hokein wrote: > @pranavk see #98613. > > edit: sorry, the error recovery that is currently performed will not detect > cases where the template argument list does not contain a a type. i can look > into this monday.
Some analysis: given the example `this->StorageT<I>` where `I` is an `int`, the error recovery mechanism uses `isTemplateArgumentList` [here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp#L563) to check if the current token sequence `< I >` forms a `< template-argument-list >`. However, since `I` is an expression, this becomes an ambiguous case—it could be interpreted as a less than comparison. Consequently, the error recovery doesn't activate for this case, and a hard error is emitted. We might be able to tweak or improve the heuristic, but I don't have a good idea for an easy fix. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
