hmm
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
Hey everyone,
To throw in my two cents, I've built hundreds of thousands of
toolchains (automatically tested and deployed) and came up with this:
There are three types of toolchains:
1> those that are specifically built for the distribution by its vendors
2> those that are built by (1>) f
Hey everyone.
Anecdotally,
strace lscpu 2> logfile
cat logfile
shows a number of parses of /sys followed by some parsing of /proc
specifically:
open("/proc/cpuinfo", O_RDONLY) = 3
uname({sysname="Linux", nodename="cgraff1-host", ...}) = 0
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}
Hey Everyone,
On a sort of tangential note, I often run my CI tests at -j1. The
problem with this is that it doesn't test parallel jobs, and I have
seen builds that succeed on -j1 that otherwise fail. Doesn't matter
much to me, but thought I'd throw in my two cents. I did see that
https://gitlab.c
Sorry about the double post. my monitor is cracked and my connection
is slow. I'll get it fixed soon.
Graff
On 11/14/18, CM Graff wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Moving away from opensuse seems like an alright idea. But in my
> opinion it would be better to have hardware running 1> distributions
> th
Hey everyone,
Moving away from opensuse seems like an alright idea. But in my
opinion it would be better to have hardware running 1> distributions
that offer alternatives to systemd like gentoo. 2> distributions
running musl or uclibc like alpine or gentoo. Testing on musl and
uclibc offers a very
and it results in the same issue.
>> Thank you for installing that Assaf! It will come in handy quite soon.
>>
>> I'll take some of these questions to the netbsd developers and try to
>> get to the bottom of this.
>>
>> Thanks again!
>>
>> Graf
Hello Baptiste and everyone!
I am going to need FreeBSD i386 and aarch64 (and probably NetBSD and
OpenBSD at some point) in order to complete the process of porting
hlibc to FreeBSD. This being the case, I may as well step up and work
on supplying them for the entire farm user base. Let me know wh
sions - I'll' try to learn the 64 bit version first though, but may
end up "cheating" and just doing the older 32 bit.
Thank you!
Graff
On 10/7/18, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 12:28 AM CM Graff via cfarm-users
> wrote:
>> ...
>> So my questio
issue.
> Thank you for installing that Assaf! It will come in handy quite soon.
>
> I'll take some of these questions to the netbsd developers and try to
> get to the bottom of this.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Graff
>
>
>
>
> On 10/6/18, Assaf Gordon wrote:
Hey everybody!
I am working on porting hlibc to various operating systems and am
starting to work a little with AIX. Sadly though, hlibc does not have
any assembly code for powerpc and I am not sure I am up to learning
powerpc assembly in the 1 week I have before the semester starts back
up and I
n.
I'll take some of these questions to the netbsd developers and try to
get to the bottom of this.
Thanks again!
Graff
On 10/6/18, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> Hello Graff,
>
> On 06/10/18 09:02 PM, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote:
>> To follow up, I think that the problem is a b
Hey Everyone!!
To follow up, I think that the problem is a bit more complex. I am
guessing now that there is a Linux/ELF compat mechanism somewhere in
the default compiler search path. I think for hlibc to work with
NetBSD I'll have to research how this all works, or perhaps even
specify a differen
Hey again everyone!
I got into the NetBSD VM and am working on NetBSD support for hlibc.
This is just a fairly naive trial run using the syscall numbers from
freebsd's syscall.master. Something is a bit odd, as if NetBSD needs
ELF or some type of linux emulation layer. Here is what I got:
gcc300$
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 01:57:14PM -0500, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote:
>> `ssh cgra...@gcc303.fsffrance.org' and `ssh
>> cgra...@gcc300.fsffrance.org' (the NetBSD and FreeBSD virtual
>> machines) are not responding for me. It does not appear to be a key
>
Hello Everyone!
`ssh cgra...@gcc303.fsffrance.org' and `ssh
cgra...@gcc300.fsffrance.org' (the NetBSD and FreeBSD virtual
machines) are not responding for me. It does not appear to be a key
error.
I'm working at adding support for NetBSD and FreeBSD to hlibc
(https://github.com/hlibc/hlibc) so it
Not sure what happened there, or if it was something I was doing, but
gcc 113 seems fine now. Apologies for false? alarm.
graff
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
The hard drive on gcc113 has been completely filled and is nearing 500GB.
graff
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
I agree with Segher on this. the only way for us to all share the
machines gracefully without constricting system limits and automatic
deletions is for each user to heuristically address their own usage
needs and delete what they don't need accordingly. For me, that
happens to be nearly everything,
For those of you like myself who don't have any important data stored
on the build machines, I used a fairly crude script to finally clean
out all of my work. Even on machines that I may have forgotten that I
used:
#!/bin/sh
if [ $# = 0 ]
thenCOUNT=20
elseCOUNT=$1
fi
USERNAME=cgraff1
whil
Hey again everyone,
Gcc75 appears to be fine now. Sorry for the false alarm. I was
concerned that my usage had interfered with the normal functioning of
the device.
Sorry for the noise and thanks again,
graff
On 12/3/17, CM Graff wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I was booting an instance of qemu on gcc
Hello everyone,
I was booting an instance of qemu on gcc75 to test an arm based linux
kernel that was generated by my project arbsh/ironwill and it appears
to have crashed the machine or otherwise messed something up. I am
trying to use ssh -f, to access the machine and shut down any
processes of m
Hello everyone!
I have been unable to connect to gcc70,
ssh cgra...@gcc70.fsffrance.org
ssh: connect to host gcc70.fsffrance.org port 22: Connection timed out
ssh -vvv cgra...@gcc70.fsffrance.org
OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.1, OpenSSL 1.0.2g 1 Mar 2016
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/s
, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> CM Graff via cfarm-users writes:
>> Furthermore, this probably represent an error in the installation
>> process of gcc. as that symlink is made by default.
>
> GCC's make install target does not install a 'cc&#
Thomas,
Thank you for the first polite response I have gotten on this mailing
list, sorry to greet it with such severity however in the process of
testing and development I am rather choosy about what is a
professional level installation.
My toolchain building project grafland/toolchain is a stan
gcc111 uses gcc-4.8.1 so as an experiment I performed the following test:
wget http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.8.1/gcc-4.8.1.tar.gz
gunzip gcc-4.8.1.tar.gz
tar -xf gcc-4.8.1.tar
cd gcc-4.8.1
./configure --prefix="${HOME}/testarea"
make -j2 >logfile 2>errlog
make install
configure: error: Buil
Furthermore, this probably represent an error in the installation
process of gcc. as that symlink is made by default.
Graff
On 10/11/17, CM Graff wrote:
> In order for makefiles to be portable without a configure script, one
> can _not_ hard code CC = gcc, or CC = clang for that matter.
> gcc111.
In order for makefiles to be portable without a configure script, one
can _not_ hard code CC = gcc, or CC = clang for that matter.
gcc111.fsffrance.org seems to work fine with basic testing with the
`gcc' binary. However, this is incorrect. There needs to be in the
very least a symlink from `gcc' t
hine" is as merit-less as "don't reinvent the
wheel".
Graff
On 10/11/17, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 09:29:12AM -0500, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote:
>> What is done with donations should be decided by the group.
>
> Lol, no, that is not ho
Continued mention of the need for nearly useless AIX cross platform
testing while not addressing the need for useful netbsd and freebsd
cross platform testing is illogical.
On 10/11/17, Toebs Douglass via cfarm-users
wrote:
> On 11/10/17 16:22, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote:
>> I've also f
"no BSDs", "no arm boards" and "idle AIX machines".
Graff
On 10/11/17, Toebs Douglass via cfarm-users
wrote:
> On 11/10/17 15:53, Markus Trippelsdorf via cfarm-users wrote:
>> On 2017.10.11 at 15:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote:
>>> On
You guys really over-reacted about this.
On 10/11/17, Toebs Douglass via cfarm-users
wrote:
> On 11/10/17 15:01, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote:
>> I believe the problem is that very few of us actually want or need
>> AIX. It's nice of IBM to donate machines, but we need t
instantaneously upon getting the AIX server message
if I happen to accidentally wander onto one of the machines
Graff
On 10/11/17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 11 October 2017 at 15:01, CM Graff via cfarm-users
> wrote:
>> I believe the problem is that very few of us actually want o
I believe the problem is that very few of us actually want or need
AIX. It's nice of IBM to donate machines, but we need them running
linux, netbsd or freebsd. I don't advertise my work here, and nor
would I expect it to be pre-installed if I donated a machine. Why
should IBM be any different. Furt
34 matches
Mail list logo
