Thomas, Thank you for the first polite response I have gotten on this mailing list, sorry to greet it with such severity however in the process of testing and development I am rather choosy about what is a professional level installation.
My toolchain building project grafland/toolchain is a standalone build system that can retrieve development headers and do entire installations on its own without the proper libraries installed and without the additional gcc retrieval scripts, (which have no method of checking package security without https which AIX lacks support for in its wget) . This nearly exhaustive project was the premise under which I was granted permission to use the cfarm. However this is irrelevant. I would never ask any of you to use a system that was not tested to be capable of rebuilding its own compiler, as mine always are to at least 4 rebuilds of the system base.. At some point we'll have to address the dwindling resources at the cfarm and the lack of interest in stewardship with some other method than finding deficits in the approaches of its users. Graff On 10/12/17, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote: > Hi Graff, > >> Gcc recommends that the local libraries libgmp, libmpfr and libmpc be >> installed on the development machine, which they are, but they do not >> coordinate with gcc-4.8.1. > > I have found that running contrib/download_prerequisites from the > gcc root directory resolves all problems with library versions > flawlessly (and resolves quite a few problems both on my > home machine and on the gcc compile farm). You can try that. > > Regards > > Thomas > _______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
