You guys really over-reacted about this.
On 10/11/17, Toebs Douglass via cfarm-users <cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > On 11/10/17 15:01, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote: >> I believe the problem is that very few of us actually want or need >> AIX. It's nice of IBM to donate machines, but we need them running >> linux, netbsd or freebsd. I don't advertise my work here, and nor >> would I expect it to be pre-installed if I donated a machine. Why >> should IBM be any different. Furthermore, the product AIX is just not, >> and never has been important to the free software community, leading >> to time wastage and novelty test runs. > > Could say the same about every non-Intel and non-ARM architecture :-) > > For me, doing lock-free, I profoundly value every architecture I can get > my hands on, because it helps me test code which is problematic to test. > > _______________________________________________ > cfarm-users mailing list > cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net > https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users > _______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
