On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Joe Touch wrote:
Some questions:
On 7/6/2015 11:16 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
...
You can flash back the factory firmware without serial, you just use
sysupgrade with the Linksys factory image.
How does that differ from mtd, e.g., as indicated here (which doesn't
menti
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in
`/build/cero3/src/ac1900/build_dir/toolchain-arm_cortex-a9+vfpv3_gcc-4.8-linaro_musl-1.1.10_eabi/gcc-linaro-4.8-2014.04-minimal/arm-openwrt-linux-muslgnueabi/libgcc':
configure: error: cannot compute
> On Jul 10, 2015, at 12:03 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Joe Touch wrote:
>>
>> Some questions:
>>
>>> On 7/6/2015 11:16 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>> ...
>>> You can flash back the factory firmware without serial, you just use
>>> sysupgrade with the Linksys fac
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Joe Touch wrote:
Can you explain where the info on using the sysupgrade command to revert
to the factory image is??
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/linksys/wrt1200ac#how_to_flash_the_firmware_to_device
The web ui uses the "sysupgrade" command. So implicitly the instructions
Hi Joe,
On Jul 10, 2015, at 09:22 , Joe Touch wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 10, 2015, at 12:03 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Joe Touch wrote:
>>>
>>> Some questions:
>>>
On 7/6/2015 11:16 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
...
You can flash back the factory fir
I transitioned from ceroWRT to lupin, now at undisclosed version 4, to
try cake. I have a renown poor ADSL line, connected to TalkTalk. After
getting a 60 GBP discount by negotiating with a woman and her imaginary
Manager friend in Bangalore a month ago, I have no intention of moving
to fibre.
You're already using correct syntax - I've written it to be quite lenient
and use sensible defaults for missing information. There are several sets
of keywords and parameters which are mutually orthogonal, and don't depend
on each other, so "besteffort" has nothing to do with "overhead" or "atm".
I am using the latest version compiled by DT, after you last made this
incompatibility comment on the cake list.
I happen to have compiled separately a build with your changes of 22
days ago incorporated, but based on lupin undisclosed version 2. I shall
try that.
I am making an assumption t
Qdiscs should be used on any link that might become a bottleneck. In most
consumer cases, that will indeed be your WAN interface.
- Jonathan Morton
___
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/
You are absolutely correct.
I tried both a numeric overhead value, and alternatively 'pppoe-vcmux'
and 'ether-fcs' in the build I crafted based on r46006, which is lupin
undeclared version 2. Everything works as stated.
On lupin undeclared version 4, the current release based on r46117, the
Hi Fred,
I'm not familiar with "lupin undeclared" - could you send a pointer/link?
Thanks.
Rich
On Jul 10, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Fred Stratton wrote:
>
> You are absolutely correct.
>
> I tried both a numeric overhead value, and alternatively 'pppoe-vcmux' and
> 'ether-fcs' in the build I cra
I'm glad to hear there's a working version (even if it's not in the
current build :).
Do you have measurable improvements with overhead configured (v.s.
unconfigured)?
I've used netperfrunner from CeroWrtScripts, e.g.
sh netperfrunner.sh -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net -p $ISP_ROUTER
I beli
On 10/07/15 16:16, Rich Brown wrote:
Hi Fred,
I'm not familiar with "lupin undeclared" - could you send a pointer/link?
Thanks.
Rich
The unversioned testing build Dave posted at
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/lupin/ar71xx/
which is not declared on the CeroWrt homepage. (Presumab
I have yet to undertake formal testing.
I moved from using a Buffalo WMBR-G300 running Barrier Breaker to a
bridged device when I broke the former tying to install Homenet.
I omitted to recraft the cake script I was using to incorporate the
correct interface, now pppoe-wan, and was unaware of
On 7/10/2015 1:01 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
...
> You can flash back the factory firmware without serial, you just use
> sysupgrade with the Linksys factory image.
How does that differ from mtd, e.g., as indicated here (which doesn't
mention sysinstall)?:
...
>> Can you
By your command
Rebooted to rerun qdisc script, rather than changing qdiscs from the
command-line, so suboptimal process as end-point changed.
script configuring qdiscs and overhead 40 on
sh netperfrunner.sh -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net -p 2.96.48.1
2015-07-10 18:22:08 Testing netperf-eu.buff
Hi Fred,
your results seem to indicate that cake is not active at all, as the latency
under load is abysmal (a quick check is to look at the median in relation to
the min and the 90% number, in your examples all of these are terrible). Could
you please post the result of the following commands
On 10/07/15 19:46, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Fred,
your results seem to indicate that cake is not active at all, as the latency
under load is abysmal (a quick check is to look at the median in relation to
the min and the 90% number, in your examples all of these are terrible). Could
you p
enabled 1
is needed
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Fred Stratton wrote:
>
>
> On 10/07/15 19:46, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> Hi Fred,
>>
>> your results seem to indicate that cake is not active at all, as the
>> latency under load is abysmal (a quick check is to look at the median in
>> re
On 10/07/15 19:25, Fred Stratton wrote:
By your command
Rebooted to rerun qdisc script, rather than changing qdiscs from the
command-line, so suboptimal process as end-point changed.
Assuming you use sqm-scripts, you can restart SQM manually.
"/etc/init.d/sqm restart".
_
> qdisc cake 8002: dev pppoe-wan root refcnt 2 bandwidth 850Kbit besteffort
> flows raw
> qdisc cake 8001: dev ifb4pppoe-wan root refcnt 2 bandwidth 11500Kbit
> besteffort flows atm overhead 40
> Download: 6.8 Mbps
> Upload: 0.59 Mbps
Does anyone else see the discrepancy here?
Simply put,
Hi Jonathan, hi Fred,
On Jul 10, 2015, at 21:18 , Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> qdisc cake 8002: dev pppoe-wan root refcnt 2 bandwidth 850Kbit besteffort
>> flows raw
>
>> qdisc cake 8001: dev ifb4pppoe-wan root refcnt 2 bandwidth 11500Kbit
>> besteffort flows atm overhead 40
>
>> Download: 6.8
bridge sync is circa 10 000 kbit/s
with the cake option in sqm enabled
config queue 'eth1'
option qdisc_advanced '0'
option enabled '1'
option interface 'pppoe-wan'
option upload '850'
option qdisc 'cake'
option script 'simple_pppoe.qos'
option linklayer 'atm'
opt
Hi Fred,
On Jul 10, 2015, at 21:34 , Fred Stratton wrote:
> bridge sync is circa 10 000 kbit/s
>
> with the cake option in sqm enabled
>
> config queue 'eth1'
>option qdisc_advanced '0'
>option enabled '1'
>option interface 'pppoe-wan'
>option upload '850'
>option qdisc 'c
On 10/07/15 20:34, Fred Stratton wrote:
bridge sync is circa 10 000 kbit/s
with the cake option in sqm enabled
config queue 'eth1'
option qdisc_advanced '0'
option enabled '1'
option interface 'pppoe-wan'
option upload '850'
option qdisc 'cake'
option script 'simple_pppo
Hi Alan,
On Jul 10, 2015, at 21:41 , Alan Jenkins
wrote:
> On 10/07/15 20:34, Fred Stratton wrote:
>> bridge sync is circa 10 000 kbit/s
>>
>> with the cake option in sqm enabled
>>
>> config queue 'eth1'
>>option qdisc_advanced '0'
>>option enabled '1'
>>option interface 'pppoe-w
These are the latest scripts, AFAIK
no overhead allowance. I note.
On 10/07/15 20:40, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Jul 10, 2015, at 21:34 , Fred Stratton wrote:
bridge sync is circa 10 000 kbit/s
with the cake option in sqm enabled
config queue 'eth1'
option qdisc_advanced
On 10/07/15 20:45, Fred Stratton wrote:
These are the latest scripts, AFAIK
no overhead allowance. I note.
Excellent point. There is, but SQM uses "tc stab" for it by default,
and there's no way to read that out.
To test using the overhead code in cake, add
option linklayer_adapta
Hi Fred,
On Jul 10, 2015, at 21:45 , Fred Stratton wrote:
> These are the latest scripts, AFAIK
Let me repeat my question: are these the scripts I attached in one of
the last mails, or the most recent scripts from ceropackages-3.10? The version
in the openwrt repository is NOT recent
replaced /usr/lib/sqm as ordered
cat /etc/config/sqm
config queue 'eth1'
option qdisc_advanced '0'
option enabled '1'
option interface 'pppoe-wan'
option upload '850'
option qdisc 'cake'
option linklayer 'atm'
option overhead '40'
option download '8500'
option
Hi Fred,
On Jul 10, 2015, at 22:07 , Fred Stratton wrote:
> replaced /usr/lib/sqm as ordered
Thanks.
>
> cat /etc/config/sqm
>
> config queue 'eth1'
>option qdisc_advanced '0'
>option enabled '1'
>option interface 'pppoe-wan'
>option upload '850'
>option qdisc 'ca
sh betterspeedtest.sh -4 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.ne
t -t 150 -p netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net -n 4 ; sh netperfrunner.sh -4 -H
netperf-
eu.bufferbloat.net -t 150 -p netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net -n 4
2015-07-10 21:15:19 Testing against netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net (ipv4)
with 4 simultaneous sessions
Hi Fred,
and now the values look decent, the latency under load increase is bounded to
38ms worst case, not bad at all for am ADSL line.
Best Regards
Sebastian
On Jul 10, 2015, at 22:24 , Fred Stratton wrote:
> sh betterspeedtest.sh -4 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.ne
> t -t 150 -p netpe
see: http://broadbandrating.com/news/virgin-america-superfast-internet/
I wonder if someone would let one of us on board with an openwrt box
to play with on their downlink?
The gogo dataset is in this dir:
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/GoGoSFO/gogo_in_flight_interplanetary_latencies.png
Ahah! I had not noticed the new code name. It's well protected - the Googles
didn't find anything.
[But now it will... Oh dear... :-) ]
Rich
On Jul 10, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Alan Jenkins
wrote:
> The unversioned testing build Dave posted at
>
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/lupin/ar
35 matches
Mail list logo
