Hi Fred, I'm not familiar with "lupin undeclared" - could you send a pointer/link? Thanks.
Rich On Jul 10, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Fred Stratton <fredstrat...@imap.cc> wrote: > > You are absolutely correct. > > I tried both a numeric overhead value, and alternatively 'pppoe-vcmux' and > 'ether-fcs' in the build I crafted based on r46006, which is lupin undeclared > version 2. Everything works as stated. > > On lupin undeclared version 4, the current release based on r46117, the > values were not recognised. > > Thank you. > > I had cake running on a Lantiq ADSL gateway running the same r46006 build. > Unfortunately this was bricked by attempts to get homenet working, so I have > nothing to report about gateway usage at present. > > > > On 10/07/15 13:57, Jonathan Morton wrote: >> >> You're already using correct syntax - I've written it to be quite lenient >> and use sensible defaults for missing information. There are several sets of >> keywords and parameters which are mutually orthogonal, and don't depend on >> each other, so "besteffort" has nothing to do with "overhead" or "atm". >> >> What's probably happening is that you're using a slightly old version of the >> cake kernel module which lacks the overhead parameter entirely, but a more >> up to date tc which does support it. We've seen this combination crop up >> ourselves recently. >> >> - Jonathan Morton >> > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
