On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:42:51 +0100 (CET), Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Has anybody stumbled at the implementation of aygshell functions
>> like
>> SHCreateMenuBar() for pure Win32? Maybe not as a standalone library,
>> but as part of a project
Hi,
You should discuss with mingw-w64 folks and especially with Kai Tietz
because
he was interested in including mingw32ce inside their repository.
It would be great to do so because some features that have been
included into
mingw-w64 could be backported to cegcc (SEH exceptions, unicode
startup)
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:38:06 +0200, André Hentschel
wrote:
> Am 20.09.2010 23:56, schrieb Vincent Torri:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>>> i ported Wine to ARM and want to try if it is possible to run some basic
>>> CE apps in it.
>>> So i stubbed out the dlls(mostly coredll) or forwarded the known
>>> functions.
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:45:51 -0400
wrote:
>> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
>> > found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about
>> > doing it cleanly with git (import gcc svn with all its history, copy
>> > cegcc on top, rebase on late
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:53:43 +0200 (CEST), Vincent Torri
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I would like to know the status of this project. I haven't seen any
> message for months on that ML
>
> thank you
>
> Vincent Torri
>
>
--
> T
> Hi,
> I'm sorry for being a bit out of the purpose of this group, but I
> don't really know any better place to ask for help.
>
> It's all about a "partially" broken PND running Windows CE 5.0 Core.
>
> This is a Chinese product, called "SmartGPS SG610". Internally,
> however, it runs "malata.e
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:47:09 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 21:15 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
>> Meaning, I think, that it does indeed crash in that statement. The
>> double "ldr r3, [r3]" seems odd. Even more odd is that the code in
>> a/t.dll.objdump is different : it looks exac
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:15:51 -0400, Pavel Pavlov
wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 04:25 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
>> > Sorry, I should have give more info. Off course default vanilla armv4
>> will work,
>> > but I need to enable armv7 + neon compilation. Currently, It won't
>> compile the
>> > cod
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:09:40 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:37 +0100, Vincent Richomme wrote:
>> Danny,
>>
>> Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047
>
>> Would it be dif
Danny,
Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ?
Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc version
(gcc-4.4.3) ?
--
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Pre
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:39:01 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> I trimmed down the file posted earlier to the source attached.
>
> When you define macro CRASH, that's what the compiler does. See below.
>
> I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat me
> to it :-)
>
Why are yo
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:05:55 -0200, Daniel Monteiro
wrote:
> Tried that with a SDL app of mine (http://angstron2.garage.maemo.org ,
the
> one Im trying to port to OpenGL ES), but the results were marginally
better
> (tunning for xscale). Its kind of weird, since I tried it on my
> pxa...@315mhz ph
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:43:21 -0200, Daniel Monteiro
wrote:
> Tried setting those by hand, but it generated link errors.
> The said simbols actually looks like what I was looking for. Gonna try
> those when I get home.
> Also worth asking: Is it me or everything in WinMo is ARMv4, right?
I would sa
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:17:44 +0100, Vincent Richomme
wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:29:41 +0100, Danny Backx
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 00:45 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
>>> On 2010/01/29 18:06, Danny Backx wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2010-01-26 at
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:29:41 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 00:45 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
>> On 2010/01/29 18:06, Danny Backx wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 23:14 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
>> > > When I attempt to force WINVER=0x410, the linker bails out with
>> > >
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:02:57 +0100, Vincent Richomme
wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:23:55 -0800 (PST), İsmail "cartman" Dönmez
> wrote:
>> Sean Healy wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I found no way to search the archive to see if someon
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:23:55 -0800 (PST), İsmail "cartman" Dönmez
wrote:
> Sean Healy wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I found no way to search the archive to see if someone else has
reported
>> a similar error, so I'm posting it to the list. gcc doesn't seem to be
>> working. When I run the program,
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:08:34 +0100, Sean Healy
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found no way to search the archive to see if someone else has reported
> a similar error, so I'm posting it to the list. gcc doesn't seem to be
> working. When I run the program, it exits with no error message - no
> message
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:00:46 +0100 (CET), Vincent Torri
wrote:
> Hey
>
> current gcc 4.4 release is 4.4.3 (released a few days ago). cegcc uses
> 4.4.0, afaik. Would it be difficult to update gcc in cegcc trunk ?
>
> while i'm talking of gcc: Pedro, what is the status of merging your
> patches
19 matches
Mail list logo
