Re: [Cegcc-devel] ported packages : new version

2010-01-30 Thread Pedro Alves
On Saturday 30 January 2010 18:39:25, Vincent Torri wrote: > Pedro, if you have, once, untar the ported package, you should have > remarked that i provide the dll, and they are stripped (see README > file...). Pasting the relevant bits of the file in the email body goes a long way torwards maki

Re: [Cegcc-devel] ported packages : new version

2010-01-30 Thread Dave Korn
On 30/01/2010 17:52, Pedro Alves wrote: > There's no reason to copy a dll with debug info to > the device. You can copy a stripped version, and keep > the version with debug info in the host. > > Of course, if you want to provide a prebuilt dll with > debug info to users, you can also provide an

Re: [Cegcc-devel] limits.h not found

2010-01-30 Thread Dave Korn
On 30/01/2010 17:48, Pedro Alves wrote: > Doesn't the gcc version include_next the mingw one? Is there > actually a problem you're seeing? GCC has its own private version, which is supposed to include a private fixed version of the system's original header: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-01

Re: [Cegcc-devel] ported packages : new version

2010-01-30 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Saturday 30 January 2010 17:41:41, Vincent Torri wrote: >> >> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >>> On Saturday 30 January 2010 07:13:55, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> -g is not an option. The dll would be too big. The fact that a dll takes >

Re: [Cegcc-devel] ported packages : new version

2010-01-30 Thread Pedro Alves
On Saturday 30 January 2010 17:41:41, Vincent Torri wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > On Saturday 30 January 2010 07:13:55, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > >> -g is not an option. The dll would be too big. The fact that a dll takes > >> in memory a multiple of 64KB is already a

Re: [Cegcc-devel] limits.h not found

2010-01-30 Thread Pedro Alves
On Saturday 30 January 2010 11:35:45, Danny Backx wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 18:47 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Danny Backx wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 13:33 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote: > > >> i've just installed cegcc (mingw32ce compiler) from the svn r

Re: [Cegcc-devel] ported packages : new version

2010-01-30 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Saturday 30 January 2010 07:13:55, Vincent Torri wrote: > >> -g is not an option. The dll would be too big. The fact that a dll takes >> in memory a multiple of 64KB is already a problem. > > ??? The data -g puts in the dll doesn't contribute a singl

Re: [Cegcc-devel] arm-mingw32ce-gcc -g makes ld fail in mingw

2010-01-30 Thread Pedro Alves
On Friday 29 January 2010 22:01:09, Sébastien Lorquet wrote: > but... Why?! I didn't look closely, but, it sounds like you're debugging the wrong binary --- it looks like you want to debug ld, not collect2. Rerun the collect2 command line with -v, and that will show you the ld invocation. -- Pe

Re: [Cegcc-devel] limits.h not found

2010-01-30 Thread Danny Backx
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 18:47 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Danny Backx wrote: > > > On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 13:33 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote: > >> i've just installed cegcc (mingw32ce compiler) from the svn repo. There is > >> a limits.h in the folowin sub directories: > >> >

Re: [Cegcc-devel] ported packages : new version

2010-01-30 Thread Pedro Alves
On Saturday 30 January 2010 07:13:55, Vincent Torri wrote: > -g is not an option. The dll would be too big. The fact that a dll takes > in memory a multiple of 64KB is already a problem. ??? The data -g puts in the dll doesn't contribute a single byte to what the dll takes in memory. -- Pedro