On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Pedro Alves wrote:

> On Saturday 30 January 2010 17:41:41, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday 30 January 2010 07:13:55, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>>
>>>> -g is not an option. The dll would be too big. The fact that a dll takes
>>>> in memory a multiple of 64KB is already a problem.
>>>
>>> ???  The data -g puts in the dll doesn't contribute a single byte
>>> to what the dll takes in memory.
>>
>> ok, but runtime startup is a lot bigger
>
> What's runtime startup?

time spent during startup. Sorry

>
> There's no reason to copy a dll with debug info to
> the device.  You can copy a stripped version, and keep
> the version with debug info in the host.
>
> Of course, if you want to provide a prebuilt dll with
> debug info to users, you can also provide an
> already pre-stripped dll.

Ok, i restart :

1) Can people read the README file of the current packages to see if the 
flags are good or not, useless or not, etc... ?

2) Can people tell me which flags i should use to optimize the built for 
speed ?

Pedro, if you have, once, untar the ported package, you should have 
remarked that i provide the dll, and they are stripped (see README 
file...).

thank you

Vincent Torri

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to