On 30/01/2010 17:48, Pedro Alves wrote:

> Doesn't the gcc version include_next the mingw one?  Is there
> actually a problem you're seeing?

  GCC has its own private version, which is supposed to include a private
fixed version of the system's original header:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-01/msg01706.html

> If there is a system limits.h, then the limits.h which gcc installs
> should have the line
>     #include "syslimits.h"
> 
> That file should either be the fixed version of <limits.h> installed
> by fixincludes, or, if <limits.h> does not need to be fixed, it should
> have the line
>     #include_next <limits.h>

  It goes on to suggest that it might be necessary to define "LIMITS_H_TEST =
true" in the t-* makefile frag, so if you guys don't get syslimits.h being
generated, maybe that would fix it for you too?

    cheers,
      DaveK


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to