dnesday, August 1, 2018 20:17
> To: cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Docbook
>
> Yes. It's a static code analysis tool. Current stats are:
>
> 3851 total defects, 1831 outstanding, 38 dismissed, 1982 fixed.
>
> So you can see another reason why I
Message
From: Jon Trulson
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 20:17
To: cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Docbook
Yes. It's a static code analysis tool. Current stats are:
3851 total defects, 1831 outstanding, 38 dismissed, 1982 fixed.
So you can see
Is it related to "coverage"? I tried to look up
a definition some time back and came up dry.
-mrt
Original Message
From: Jon Trulson
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 12:09
To: Matthew R. Trower
Cc: Marcin Cieslak; cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Do
cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Docbook
>
> On 07/31/2018 08:47 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
>
> > Jon Trulson j...@radscan.com writes:
> >
> > > On 07/31/2018 07:53 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
> > >
> > > >
12:09
To: Matthew R. Trower
Cc: Marcin Cieslak; cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Docbook
On 07/31/2018 08:47 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
> Jon Trulson writes:
>
>> On 07/31/2018 07:53 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
>>> Jon Trulson writes:
&
On 07/31/2018 08:47 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Jon Trulson writes:
On 07/31/2018 07:53 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Jon Trulson writes:
Not a clue. I think ultimately we would want it to generate HTML and
just use a web browser for both help and the guides.
I'd really hate to see that
Jon Trulson writes:
> On 07/31/2018 07:53 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
>> Jon Trulson writes:
>>
>>> Not a clue. I think ultimately we would want it to generate HTML and
>>> just use a web browser for both help and the guides.
>>
>> I'd really hate to see that.
>>
>> * DtInfo is part of CDE.
>>
On 07/31/2018 07:53 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Jon Trulson writes:
Not a clue. I think ultimately we would want it to generate HTML and
just use a web browser for both help and the guides.
I'd really hate to see that.
* DtInfo is part of CDE.
* DtInfo (like all of CDE) is very lightweig
Jon Trulson writes:
> Not a clue. I think ultimately we would want it to generate HTML and
> just use a web browser for both help and the guides.
I'd really hate to see that.
* DtInfo is part of CDE.
* DtInfo (like all of CDE) is very lightweight.
* DtInfo provides index and search capabilit
Did you try running dtinfo and looking at some of the guides? That's
definitely an error... Maybe you had a previous install already there?
Anyway, I'm just guessing, but it would fail the build (the make[4]: ***
[usersGuide/TOC.sgm] Error 255" line).
-jon
On 07/31/2018 07:03 PM, Chase wrote
Surprisingly no, the man pages and the other docs wrote without a hiccup.
Thank you for your time,
-Chase
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 31, 2018 8:01 PM, Jon Trulson wrote:
> On 07/31/2018 06:55 PM, Chase wrote:
>
> > To answer a previous question you posed, It worked fairly well, w
On 07/31/2018 06:55 PM, Chase wrote:
To answer a previous question you posed, It worked fairly well, with one minor
problem that dtinfogen keeps throwing a very nondescript error of "dtinfogen:
sgmls not found
make[4]: *** [usersGuide/TOC.sgm] Error 255"
Ok, so creating the guides was broken
To answer a previous question you posed, It worked fairly well, with one minor
problem that dtinfogen keeps throwing a very nondescript error of "dtinfogen:
sgmls not found
make[4]: *** [usersGuide/TOC.sgm] Error 255"
Thank you for your time,
-Chase
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 31,
On 07/31/2018 04:59 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018, Jon Trulson wrote:
So - is anyone on this list familiar with docbook XML want to take up the task
of upgrading our documentation format and generation to something from this
decade?
Short term, using a new onsgmls is probably t
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018, Jon Trulson wrote:
> So - is anyone on this list familiar with docbook XML want to take up the task
> of upgrading our documentation format and generation to something from this
> decade?
>
> Short term, using a new onsgmls is probably the way to go, but long term, it
> seems
I guess we should at some point discuss the whole SGML infrastructure in
CDE.
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/DocBook-Demystification-HOWTO/sgml.html
This link provides a decent 'demystification' of docbook and where it is
going.
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/DocBook-Demystification-HOWTO/
XML is the current
16 matches
Mail list logo
