> On Jan 31, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>
> The parity change in the CPU was to change parity errors from vectoring
> thru location 4 to vector through 114.
Yes, but also, there was apparently rework of logic feeding the CONF console
flag and associated abort signaling. Before the
On 1/31/2019 12:02 PM, Fritz Mueller via cctalk wrote:
>
> I don't actually have anything that uses the M8110; I am mostly interested in
> that one to understand how it co-evolved with the parity changes in the CPU
> (sometimes its easier to understand if you can see both sides).
>
>cheer
> On Jan 31, 2019, at 3:02 PM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 1/31/2019 12:02 PM, Fritz Mueller via cctalk wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I don't actually have anything that uses the M8110; I am mostly interested
>> in that one to understand how it co-evolved with the parity changes in the
>> C
> On Jan 31, 2019, at 11:47 AM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>
> I have completed my transcription of what I felt would be the most
> salient entries and information in those entries of the PDP-11/45
> DEC-O-Logs.
>
> The transcripts are available on my Google Drive at
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?
I have completed my transcription of what I felt would be the most
salient entries and information in those entries of the PDP-11/45
DEC-O-Logs.
Curiously, there were no entries at all for the KB11-D.
The transcripts are available on my Google Drive at
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2v4WRwIS
> On Jan 31, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>
> I am working on transcribing some DEC-O-Logs - more than are on
> bitsavers that relate to the KB11-A and its cards.
Oooh! I'm excited again! :-)
> In the process, I came across KB11A-B0008 - which indicates that NPG,
> PA, PB, LTC, ACLO
On 1/27/2019 6:40 PM, Fritz Mueller via cctalk wrote:
> Those reading through the recent "PDP-11/45 RSTS/E boot problem" thread here
> will know that I've gotten to some corners of my 11/45 CPU now that don't
> match up with the commonly available engineering drawings.
>
> My /45 is an early se
OK, my scanning of PDP-11/45 materials is done, at least for now.
Materials can be found on my Google Drive at:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2v4WRwISEQRWWFFdVpCZWFTZEU
In sub folders pdf/dec/pdp11/1145 and .../memory
Everything is both directories is new EXCEPT for
PDP11_FP11-B_Floati
> The first batch of scanning is done... 600dpi, CCITT Group 4 except for
> the cover pages which are LZW.
>
> You will find them in my Google Drive at
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2v4WRwISEQRWWFFdVpCZWFTZEU
>
> In subfolder pdf/dec/pdp11/1145
Thanks, Jay!
I note with some amusement
> On Jan 28, 2019, at 8:26 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> E.g. my M8100 prints are dated 2/72, and none contain any entries in the
> 'Revisions' block (lower left). However, they are marked as Rev. D, which is
> newer than the KB11-A prints at Bitsaver, which are marked as Rev. C. So
On 1/27/2019 9:07 PM, Jay Jaeger via cctech wrote:
>
> Let me know what you want me to scan - should be able to get to it later
> this week.
>
> JRJ
>
>
> On 1/27/2019 6:40 PM, Fritz Mueller via cctalk wrote:
>> Those reading through the recent "PDP-11/45 RSTS/E boot problem" thread here
>> wi
> On Jan 29, 2019, at 1:46 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>
> Dang it - the dates fooled me. (blush) Sorry to get your hopes up,
> Fritz.
Oh, darn! Well, thanks anyway for taking a look. And so the search
continues...
The later revisions and other docs are still quite a nice find, and it would
cer
Dang it - the dates fooled me. (blush) Sorry to get your hopes up,
Fritz.
Here is some more accurate information:
The first set:
The first page (the directory) is actually 6/76 in the revisions
block. It is *later* than the one on bitsavers.
Interesting, though: it actually shows TW
On 1/27/2019 11:01 PM, Fritz Mueller via cctalk wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
>> On Jan 27, 2019, at 7:07 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>>
>> I think I can help some... I DO have earlier PDP-11/45 CPU drawings...
>
> Man, this list is the absolute best!
>
> The '72 KB11-A drawings would be most immediately usef
From: Jay Jaeger
> Here is what I have for drawings:
Wow. You have some very desirable stuff there! Let me point at a couple
of things of particular interest:
> B-TC-FP11-C-6 FP11-C (Print Set MP00038) December 75
> [M8126, M8127, M8128, M8129]
AFAIK, prints for the FP11-C are
> From: Fritz Mueller
> I would really like to track down any of the following resources:
> - PDP 11/45 system engineering drawings *earlier* than those currently
> available on bitsavers (Jun '74)
My KB11-A prints have an 'overall' date of "4/76" (on the front page), but
prints w
Hi Jay,
> On Jan 27, 2019, at 7:07 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>
> I think I can help some... I DO have earlier PDP-11/45 CPU drawings...
Man, this list is the absolute best!
The '72 KB11-A drawings would be most immediately useful. If you only have
time for a subset of pages, I would find the sch
I think I can help some. I have a PDP-11/45 From U. Wisc. ECE that
claims to be S/N 1525 .
* I do NOT have an actual wire list, it seems, but I will hunt a bit
more tomorrow or Tuesday.
* I DO have earlier PDP-11/45 CPU drawings, but no ECO info
Here is what I have for drawings:
B-DD-11/45-
Those reading through the recent "PDP-11/45 RSTS/E boot problem" thread here
will know that I've gotten to some corners of my 11/45 CPU now that don't match
up with the commonly available engineering drawings.
My /45 is an early serial number (#152). So far I've verified hardware
differences o
19 matches
Mail list logo
