I see it (and I observed the same thing - just rejoined after having
subscription problems stretching back to May, and didn't see any
traffic).
-ethan
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:09 PM Kevin McQuiggin via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Pardon the test message, I have just re-subscribed to the list but have se
I see your test message!
On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 08:06 -0700, Kevin McQuiggin via cctalk wrote:
> Pardon the test message, I have just re-subscribed to the list but have seen
> no traffic on it for a couple of days.
>
> Kevin McQuiggin
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 5:09 PM Kevin McQuiggin via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Pardon the test message, I have just re-subscribed to the list but have seen
> no traffic on it for a couple of days.
QSL
-tony
0x06
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 9:09 AM Kevin McQuiggin via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Pardon the test message, I have just re-subscribed to the list but have
> seen no traffic on it for a couple of days.
>
> Kevin McQuiggin
Test failed. Please call Jim West on Support Desk
---8<---Corte aqui---8<---
http://www.tabajara-labs.blogspot.com
http://www.tabalabs.com.br
---8<---Corte aqui---8<---
Em seg., 10 de fev. de 2020 às 20:08, jwest--- via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> escreveu:
> test
>
>
On 01/25/2020 10:48 AM, jwest--- via cctalk wrote:
test
Glad to see you got it back running!
Thanks,
Jon
I received your post, but mercifully I haven't received any of the
pointless replies to your post.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:30 AM Mike Ross via cctalk
wrote:
> I was banned for ages, I've been told I'm not any more; test post;
> disregard.
>
> Mike
>
On 9/13/19 1:44 PM, Senile Old Man via cctalk wrote:
Uninstall and reinstall the OS.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
Nice to see this list continues to circle the bowl.
Sorry.
I didn't mean to offend or annoy. Just joining in on ridicule of "modern
tech support".
There a
I have to say I am receiving you 5 by 9 in Toronto :-)
(OK I will go away now and get my tin hat )
cheers,
NIgel
On 13/09/2019 19:01, ben via cctalk wrote:
On 9/13/2019 3:00 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
On 9/13/19 1:44 PM, Senile Old Man via cctalk wrote:
Uninstall and reinstall the
On 9/13/2019 3:00 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
On 9/13/19 1:44 PM, Senile Old Man via cctalk wrote:
Uninstall and reinstall the OS.
Nice to see this list continues to circle the bowl.
Bare metal machines don't need a OS. Just liner notes
on the drum in felt pen. Bad sector. Core dump f
On 9/13/19 1:44 PM, Senile Old Man via cctalk wrote:
> Uninstall and reinstall the OS.
Nice to see this list continues to circle the bowl.
Sorry, we did not receive your message. Have you tried turning it off and
back on again?
:)
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Uninstall and reinstall the OS.
Are you still using an operating system that is MORE THAN 6 MONTHS o
Sorry, we did not receive your message. Have you tried turning it off and
back on again?
:)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
601
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 00:33, Alexandre Souza via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Test failed
> Please call service
>
> Enviado do meu Tele-Movel
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019, 20:30 Mike Ross via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> > I was banned for ages, I've been told I'm not any more; test post;
>
Test failed
Please call service
Enviado do meu Tele-Movel
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019, 20:30 Mike Ross via cctalk
wrote:
> I was banned for ages, I've been told I'm not any more; test post;
> disregard.
>
> Mike
>
Test faild. Please call support.
---8<---Corte aqui---8<---
http://www.tabajara-labs.blogspot.com
http://www.tabalabs.com.br
---8<---Corte aqui---8<---
Em sex, 30 de ago de 2019 às 21:21, steve shumaker via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> escreveu:
> Apologies for the question marks in the prev
earth can now be used commercially
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk On Behalf Of Ray Jewhurst via
> cctalk
> Sent: 11 August 2019 18:27
> To: Fred Cisin ; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-
> Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: Test
>
> Everybody forgot one. Hav
Everybody forgot one. Have you installed unauthorized software? That is
prohibited. This conversation brings me back to my help desk days!
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 1:04 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk
wrote:
> >> Test error. Please call helpdesk. 555-1212
> > Have you tried turning it off and on again?
>
Test error. Please call helpdesk. 555-1212
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
If that doesn't work, reinstall the operating system.
We've never heard of anybody having that problem.
Have you applied all of the latest patches and upgrades?
What did you expect? You cn't expect it t
On 11 August 2019 15:26:01 BST, Joshua Rice via cctalk
wrote:
>
>> On Aug 11, 2019, at 3:25 PM, Alexandre Souza via cctalk
> wrote:
>>
>> Test error. Please call helpdesk. 555-1212
>
>Have you tried turning it off and on again?
Argh, you beat me to it!
This joke never gets old. It only get
Test error. Please call helpdesk. 555-1212
Enviado do meu Tele-Movel
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 10:54 Charles via cctalk
wrote:
> Testing 1,2,3... my last couple of posts don't seem to be showing up?
> -Charles
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https:
> On Aug 11, 2019, at 3:25 PM, Alexandre Souza via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Test error. Please call helpdesk. 555-1212
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
This is a test
designed to provoke an emotional response
---8<---Corte aqui---8<---
http://www.tabajara-labs.blogspot.com
http://www.tabalabs.com.br
---8<---Corte aqui---8<---
Em ter, 15 de jan de 2019 às 03:49, Cindy Croxton via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> escreveu:
> Test. Please ignore.
Actually, I'm also having difficulty posting... So hereby testing, too.
- MG
2017-12-02 0:08 GMT+01:00 Jay West via cctalk :
> Test - no reply needed.
>
>
(Waits for Jay's next email "This has been a test of the new auto banning
system. Thank you.")
Original message From: Alexandre Souza via cctalk
Date: 4/27/17 1:58 PM (GMT-06:00) To: "General
Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" , Jay West
This is a test, designed to provoke an emotional response
Enviado do meu Tele-Movel
On Apr 26, 2017 9:39 PM, "Jay West via cctalk"
wrote:
> Don't need a response, please ignore.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
LOL
A+ thread would read again
--
Anders Nelson
+1 (517) 775-6129
www.erogear.com
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> This isn't a response, do not ignore.
>
This isn't a response, do not ignore.
ACK TEST RECEIVED LOUD AND CLEAR JAY!
Don't need a response, please ignore.
Cheers, Thanks,
- Ian
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Jay West via cctalk
wrote:
> Don't need a response, please ignore.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
--
Ian Finder
(206) 395-MIPS
ian.fin...@gmail.com
On 04/03/2017 03:48 PM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote:
Hi,
I just saw that mails from some people now arrive as desired (real
sender, reply-to list), but some (e.g. myself) are still mangled with
"xxx via cctalk" - did I miss a setting?
Confused...
Philipp
Wow, posting to cctech behav
On 07/03/2017 07:12, "Tor Arntsen" wrote:
> On 7 March 2017 at 01:18, Adrian Graham via cctalk
> wrote:
>> Test again, None of my posts seem to be getting through...
>
> Saw it. And also what you sent a day ago(?), about using the 79L05
Thanks for the replies! It's odd then that I don't see my
On 7 March 2017 at 01:18, Adrian Graham via cctalk
wrote:
> Test again, None of my posts seem to be getting through...
Saw it. And also what you sent a day ago(?), about using the 79L05
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017, Adrian Stoness via cctalk wrote:
> In a message dated 3/6/2017 5:18:52 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
> cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:
I just noticed the above attribution introducing a quoted email; notice
how it gives the email address cctalk@classiccmp.org but doesn't give
Hmm
On Mar 6, 2017 6:37 PM, "Ed via cctalk" wrote:
I see it!
Ed#
In a message dated 3/6/2017 5:18:52 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:
Test again, None of my posts seem to be getting through...
On 28/02/2017 00:35, "Jay West" wrote:
> Test received ;)
>
> --
I see it!
Ed#
In a message dated 3/6/2017 5:18:52 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:
Test again, None of my posts seem to be getting through...
On 28/02/2017 00:35, "Jay West" wrote:
> Test received ;)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:
Test again, None of my posts seem to be getting through...
On 28/02/2017 00:35, "Jay West" wrote:
> Test received ;)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Adrian
> Graham
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 6:34 PM
> To: Discussion: On-
ok
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Jay West wrote:
> Test received ;)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Adrian
> Graham
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 6:34 PM
> To: Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Test
>
> E
Test received ;)
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Adrian
Graham
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 6:34 PM
To: Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Test
Ezwind?
--
Adrian/Witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
Www.binarydinosa
lol
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
> replying, as per Jay's email to me
>
>
> On 8/28/16 9:19 AM, Jay West wrote:
> > No response necessary - please ignore.
> >
> >
> >
> > J
> >
>
>
replying, as per Jay's email to me
On 8/28/16 9:19 AM, Jay West wrote:
> No response necessary - please ignore.
>
>
>
> J
>
your test came through
On 8/28/16 9:19 AM, Jay West wrote:
> No response necessary - please ignore.
>
>
>
> J
>
On 12/09/2015 10:27 AM, Mike wrote:
Tihis is my first post to the group I just want to make sure that
everyone can see this and that I have it setup right please reply if
yall can see this.
Nope. Can't see it. You failed...
;)
--
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
--- CompTIA A+ Cer
Can't see it, test failed! :)
Enviado do meu Tele-Movel
Em 09/12/2015 14:46, "Adrian Stoness" escreveu:
> Hi yep can see it
> On Dec 9, 2015 10:29 AM, "william degnan" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Mike wrote:
> >
> > > Tihis is my first post to the group I just want to make su
Hi yep can see it
On Dec 9, 2015 10:29 AM, "william degnan" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Mike wrote:
>
> > Tihis is my first post to the group I just want to make sure that
> > everyone can see this and that I have it setup right please reply if
> > yall can see this.
> >
>
> Bottom
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Mike wrote:
> Tihis is my first post to the group I just want to make sure that
> everyone can see this and that I have it setup right please reply if
> yall can see this.
>
Bottom post reply. You're IN MAN.
--
Bill
vintagecomputer.net
Now totally OT, but in the broader world of YouTube info / tutorial vids, I
really like Eric the Car Guy.
Good info, solid technical practice and not a whole lot of obnoxious,
overtly egotistical or other distracting behavior. Great channel for the
DIY vehicle mechanic.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:
I used to watch Dave but his ego got to be a bit much for me ... I now
prefer "mikesslectricstuff" and "w2aew" on YT when I'm looking for some
inspiration in the form of a video.
Best,
Sean
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
> On 8/17/2015 10:06 PM, drlegendre . wrote:
> > @ J
On 8/17/2015 10:06 PM, drlegendre . wrote:
> @ Jay,
>
> Ha, yeah.. I've seen a number of his vids.. Don't mean to offend, but he
> comes off a bit squirrely (hyper) for me.
>
Probably has to or viewers would fall asleep. Jim Cramer on CNBC
operates the same way.
> Yet another freaking Aussie n
; -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jay Jaeger
> Sent: 18 August 2015 03:55
> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: test equipment / Re: Z80 / Z84C Swap (Doh!)
>
> You might check EEVBLOG on Youtube. The guy's a blast and c
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Eric Smith
> Sent: 18 August 2015 06:52
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: Re: test equipment / Re: Z80 / Z84C Swap (Doh!)
>
> I wrote:
I wrote:
> If a person has any reasonable business justification
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> But a lot of the people here don't; they're purely hobbyists. So spending
> $1K on a piece of test equipment just isn't realistic for them.
That's why I suggested the info was
> > One thing though. No piece of test gear will do more than provide evidence
> > of
> > what the circuit is doing. It will not tell you 'U38 is faulty' or whatever.
>
> In principle that was where HP was trying to go with signature
> analysis back in the 1970s. The problem has since been solved
>> If a person has any reasonable business justification
>
> But a lot of the people here don't; they're purely hobbyists. So spending
> $1K on a piece of test equipment just isn't realistic for them.
Plenty of people will spend $1K on equipment for their hobbies. No, I do not
believe
that a
> > seem to get even worse if you try to do maths functions..
> >
> > I must be viewing this quite wrong?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Dave G4UGM
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>&
5 at 3:55 PM, Dave G4UGM wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Noel
>>> Chiappa
>>> Sent: 17 August 2015 21:12
>>> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
>>> Cc:
> On Aug 17, 2015, at 7:29 PM, Dave G4UGM wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
>> drlegendre .
>> Sent: 18 August 2015 00:15
>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
> drlegendre .
> Sent: 18 August 2015 00:15
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: Re: test equipment / Re: Z80 / Z84C Swap (Doh!)
>
> Hey Dave
a
> > Sent: 17 August 2015 21:12
> > To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> > Cc: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
> > Subject: Re: test equipment / Re: Z80 / Z84C Swap (Doh!)
> >
> > > From: Eric Smith
> >
> > > If a person has any reasonable business justifi
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Noel
> Chiappa
> Sent: 17 August 2015 21:12
> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> Cc: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
> Subject: Re: test equipment / Re: Z80 / Z84C Swap (Doh!)
>
The DSO has been high on my want list for some time now.. But that said, I
made it through several Commodore machines & drives, the CRT display on the
Osborne Vixen, the Altair rebuild, several Macs and on, with what I do have
on-hand.
Lacking a DSO didn't prevent me from getting through that stuf
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: Eric Smith
> If a person has any reasonable business justification
But a lot of the people here don't; they're purely hobbyists. So spending
$1K on a piece of test equipment just isn't realistic for them.
Having said that, I do see some D
> From: Eric Smith
> If a person has any reasonable business justification
But a lot of the people here don't; they're purely hobbyists. So spending
$1K on a piece of test equipment just isn't realistic for them.
Having said that, I do see some DSO's on eBay for not much money (e.g. the
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:54 PM, tony duell wrote:
> One thing though. No piece of test gear will do more than provide evidence of
> what the circuit is doing. It will not tell you 'U38 is faulty' or whatever.
In principle that was where HP was trying to go with signature
analysis back in the 197
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
> I suffered with a low-end Tek analog scope until a few years ago; have been
> using a Tek DSO for the last few years.
>
> While there are occasions I'd like to have an LA, I can't say there are any
> instances where I've had to have an LA (
> From a usefulness perspective I'd get a DSO long before an LA.
What you use is a personal choice IMHO.
I've used DSOs (never owned one), both HP and Tektronix and never really liked
them. I use
an analogue 'scope only rarely in classic computer repair. But my (many) logic
analysers
are used
65 matches
Mail list logo
