On 12/20/2015 5:02 AM, GerardCJAT wrote:
Speaking of KiCad
Yesterday, I tried for the first time KiCad, and my first board design with it.
The very first part I was looking for I was not able to locate it.
Is it because I am a newbe or because this part does not exist yet, beeing "too
> On Dec 20, 2015, at 05:02, GerardCJAT wrote:
>
> Yesterday, I tried for the first time KiCad, and my first board design with
> it.
> The very first part I was looking for I was not able to locate it.
> Is it because I am a newbe or because this part does not exist yet, beeing
> "too old
i used a product called Trio back in the day.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 20, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Mike Whalen wrote:
>
> Again not an integrated suite but there was also Multiplan, a spreadsheet
> for the C64 from Microsoft.
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplan
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Dave G4UGM wrote:
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, Charles Anthony wrote:
Or, rather then cutting it, remove the inside threads on the shell, and
glue it back on to the plug, rather than screwing it on.
That’s about the best method, but there is not much room for extra lead
to push
On 12/20/2015 08:25 PM, Charles Anthony wrote:
It also occurs to me that for a patch cable: a measured length of
some kind of resistive wire between two plugs rather than a
resistor?
I don't think so. Vacuum tubes (or valves if you will) are
high-impedance devices. Those resistors are like
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> On 12/20/2015 03:20 PM, Charles Anthony wrote:
>
> Or, rather then cutting it, remove the inside threads on the shell,
>> and glue it back on to the plug, rather than screwing it on.
>>
>
> I don't have any to show you, but I do remember that
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Guzis"
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: EAI TR-10 Patch Plugs
> On 12/20/2015 04:10 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
>> I don't have any to show you, but I do remember that some of t
On 12/20/2015 04:10 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
I don't have any to show you, but I do remember that some of these
banana plugs used an un-threaded barrel, employing a small
(head-less) screw on the side that threaded into the top of the plug
fixture. In the long run, probably better, as they could
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Charles
> Anthony
> Sent: 20 December 2015 23:20
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: Re: EAI TR-10 Patch Plugs
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Charles Anthony
>
On 12/20/2015 03:20 PM, Charles Anthony wrote:
Or, rather then cutting it, remove the inside threads on the shell,
and glue it back on to the plug, rather than screwing it on.
I don't have any to show you, but I do remember that some of these
banana plugs used an un-threaded barrel, employing
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Paul
> Koning
> Sent: 20 December 2015 22:32
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: VAX 4000-500 PSU Overload?
>
>
> > On Dec 19, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Robert Jarratt
> wr
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Charles Anthony wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dave Wade wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
>> > ste...@malikoff.com
>> > Sent: 20 December 2015 22:23
>> > To: Genera
Are you sure it wasn't rosewood?
Polished to a satin sheen with [WELL} whale oil of course...
;-)
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, William Donzelli wrote:
I am sorry, the expiration date on this rosewood/whaileoil joke has passed.
lifetime + 95 ?
Derivative works?
The machinewas certainly a corporate wo
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dave Wade wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
> > ste...@malikoff.com
> > Sent: 20 December 2015 22:23
> > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> >
> > Subject: RE: EAI TR-
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
> ste...@malikoff.com
> Sent: 20 December 2015 22:23
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: RE: EAI TR-10 Patch Plugs
>
> Original Message --
> Are you sure it wasn't rosewood?
>
> ---
>
> Polished to a satin sheen with whale oil of course...
>
> ;-)
I am sorry, the expiration date on this rosewood/whaileoil joke has passed.
--
Will
- Original Message -
From: "Liam Proven"
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 4:06 PM
On 20 December 2015 at 04:30, Eric Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
>> Was it the Processor Technology Sol that had oak strips on the sides?
>
> Walnut.
Are you sure it w
> On Dec 19, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Robert Jarratt
> wrote:
>
> ...
> I can't tell if this is a Kelvin connected one or not, although I suspect it
> probably is. You can see a picture with two here: http://1drv.ms/1micVN7.
> These are from a second board in the PSU, but they look identical to the on
Original Message
Subject: RE: EAI TR-10 Patch Plugs
From:"Dave Wade"
Date:Mon, December 21, 2015 3:46 am
To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'"
---
On 20 December 2015 at 04:30, Eric Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
>> Was it the Processor Technology Sol that had oak strips on the sides?
>
> Walnut.
Are you sure it wasn't rosewood?
--
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lpr
On 12/20/2015 12:40 PM, Mouse wrote:
If so, 1983+95 = 2078 when it'll be public domain,
Jurisdiction-dependent. Not everywhere is crazy enough to follow
the USA's disney clause (though the Berne Convention does have some
possibly-relevant reciprocal recognition clauses).
What little I've been
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mouse wrote:
> What little I've been able to find on this in a few minutes indicates
> that "author's lifetime + 70" is more common than anything + 95.
In some (many?) jurisdictions that use author's lifetime + 70, for
works of "corporate" authorship the term is 9
> If so, 1983+95 = 2078 when it'll be public domain,
Jurisdiction-dependent. Not everywhere is crazy enough to follow the
USA's disney clause (though the Berne Convention does have some
possibly-relevant reciprocal recognition clauses).
What little I've been able to find on this in a few minutes
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> Short version is, even the cheap and simple 555 has been replaced in
> many products with a cheap-as-or-cheaper-than microcontroller, not
> because it's simpler, but because it allows for greater flexibility
> and reduces the overall product co
At 03:04 PM 12/20/2015, Eric Smith wrote:
>The problem has been solved.
Is the solution available online?
Dale H. Cook, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
Osborne 1 / Kaypro 4-84 / Kaypro 1 / Amstrad PPC-640
http://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/index.html
I asked:
> Does anyone have a scan of the IEEE-696 (S-100) standard that has NOT
> been run through OCR
The problem has been solved. Thanks!
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> Does IEEE consider this to be copyrighted material?
Of course they do.
> Have you contacted the folks at IEEE for a copy?
It's withdrawn, so IEEE doesn't sell it. Most likely IHS Global
Engineering Documents does.
Not to put too fine a po
On 12/20/2015 11:13 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Chuck Guzis
wrote:
There's another one here also, but I assume it's also an OCR
victim: http://www.z80.eu/dos65/DOS-65_IEEE_Standard_696_Guide.pdf
That's interesting, and thanks for pointing it out, but it isn't the
s
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> There's another one here also, but I assume it's also an OCR victim:
> http://www.z80.eu/dos65/DOS-65_IEEE_Standard_696_Guide.pdf
That's interesting, and thanks for pointing it out, but it isn't the standard.
Has same OCR problems. See figure 16 on page 38.
On 12/20/2015 04:02 AM, Tor Arntsen wrote:
On 20 December 2015 at 07:25, Eric Smith wrote:
Is this it? (1983)
http://www.pestingers.net/PDFs/Other_computers/IEEE%20696%20S-100%20Bus%20Specs.pdf
That's the one that's been screwed up by OCR.
What about this one? Except for the front page
Again not an integrated suite but there was also Multiplan, a spreadsheet
for the C64 from Microsoft.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplan
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
> ste...@malikoff.com
> Sent: 20 December 2015 02:10
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: EAI TR-10 Patch Plugs
>
>
> Original Message ---
>
>
>
> GEOS was also pretty well populated with various applications like the ones
> you seek. You'd need a mouse for hardware and, unfortunately, I've not had
> an easy time getting it to work well in emulation.
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEOS_(8-bit_operating_system)
>
> GEOS was fun, fun
Is anyone using this combination? I'm having problems getting it to work
reliably on a soft-sector controller in my Heath H89 and their forum is
essentially dead.
--
On Saturday, December 19, 2015, Mike wrote:
> Is there anything like Appleworks 1.0 for the commodore 64? if so could
> you be kind enough to give me the name of the program? I have searched
> but have found nothing of any value. I just would like a checkbool
> ledger and a savings spreadsheet.
>
Is there anything like Appleworks 1.0 for the commodore 64? if so could
you be kind enough to give me the name of the program? I have searched
but have found nothing of any value. I just would like a checkbool
ledger and a savings spreadsheet.
Speaking of KiCad
Yesterday, I tried for the first time KiCad, and my first board design with it.
The very first part I was looking for I was not able to locate it.
Is it because I am a newbe or because this part does not exist yet, beeing "too
old" ??
I was looking for :
Card edge con
On 20 December 2015 at 07:25, Eric Smith wrote:
>> Is this it? (1983)
>> http://www.pestingers.net/PDFs/Other_computers/IEEE%20696%20S-100%20Bus%20Specs.pdf
>
> That's the one that's been screwed up by OCR.
What about this one? Except for the front page and possibly the very
beginning, it seems t
Original Message
Subject: EAI TR-10 Patch Plugs
From:"Dave Wade"
Date:Sun, December 20, 2015 6:41 am
To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic Posts'"
--
> Fol
On 19/12/2015 20:41, Dave Wade wrote:
I can easily obtain 4mm plugs and sockets, and solder a resistor
between them, but when I try and mount them on a short rigid tube all
my efforts fail. The plug and socket need to be twisted in opposite
directions and any soldered joint just fails.
Any usgge
> -Original Message-
> From: cctech [mailto:cctech-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of william
> degnan
> Sent: 20 December 2015 00:34
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: EAI TR-10 Patch Plugs
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Pete Turnbull
> wrote:
>
> > On 19
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Pete Turnbull
wrote:
> On 19/12/2015 20:41, Dave Wade wrote:
>
>> I can easily obtain 4mm plugs and sockets, and solder a resistor
>> between them, but when I try and mount them on a short rigid tube all
>> my efforts fail. The plug and socket need to be twisted i
43 matches
Mail list logo
