Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-29 Thread Keitaro Yamashita
Dear Nick, Sorry for this. Refmacat is a replacement for the refmac5 command, so it is totally unfriendly to the people who never used Refmac as a command. But it is great you managed to use it! Best regards, Keitaro On Mon, 29 May 2023 at 22:11, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > Keitaro, > > Please di

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-29 Thread Nicholas Clark
Keitaro, Please disregard my previous email. After informing myself on how Refmac is executed from command line (via online websites & log files from GUI Refmac runs) and many trial and error executions, I was able to execute refmac5 from command line and was able to recycle the code for execution

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-29 Thread Nicholas Clark
Hi Keitaro, Thanks for the response. Is there documentation somewhere on how to run refmacat (like an example for Crystallographic data refinement, I found the one for CryoEM data but )? I have made multiple attempts to get this to run on my end but when I input the command I get "Waiting for inpu

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-27 Thread Keitaro Yamashita
Because of non-standard atom names, group names of some monomers were changed to NON-POLYMER. In this case the hydrogen atom is only the problem, so changing group to peptide works unless you have hydrogen. Moreover, in CSO, the problematic hydrogen is removed when forming a peptide link. The detai

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Nicholas Clark
Hi Paul, Thank you for providing that information. Editing the restraints for CSO corrected the issue! Your assistance is greatly appreciated. I figured I was missing something :) Best, Nick Clark On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:55 PM Paul Emsley wrote: > > On 27/05/2023 03:46, Nicholas Clark wrot

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Paul Emsley
On 27/05/2023 03:46, Nicholas Clark wrote: Paul, Yes, it appears that the upper level group is "NON-POLYMER". However, there is an alias at the bottom that does state polymer. Hi Nick, In Coot: Edit -> Restraints... -> CSO -> OK -> Change "Non-POLYMER" to "peptide" and press enter in the

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Nicholas Clark
Paul, Yes, it appears that the upper level group is "NON-POLYMER". However, there is an alias at the bottom that does state polymer. Best, Nick Clark On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:37 PM Paul Emsley wrote: > > On 27/05/2023 03:23, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > Hey Paul, > > I found the dictionary en

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Paul Emsley
On 27/05/2023 03:23, Nicholas Clark wrote: Hey Paul, I found the dictionary entry for CSO, it appears to be in the "peptide" group (under CCP4-8.0->lib->data->monomers->c->CSO.cif): "loop_ _chem_comp_alias.comp_id _chem_comp_alias.group _chem_comp_alias.atom_id _chem_comp_alias.atom_id_stand

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Nicholas Clark
Hey Paul, I found the dictionary entry for CSO, it appears to be in the "peptide" group (under CCP4-8.0->lib->data->monomers->c->CSO.cif): "loop_ _chem_comp_alias.comp_id _chem_comp_alias.group _chem_comp_alias.atom_id _chem_comp_alias.atom_id_standard CSO *peptide* HN2 H2" I've attached the fi

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Nicholas Clark
Hey Paul, I'm not sure how to check that? Would you be able to provide a resource to check this? Best, Nick Clark On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 9:21 PM Paul Emsley wrote: > > On 27/05/2023 00:43, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > I have a cysteine residue that is oxidized and needs to be modeled as CSO. >

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Paul Emsley
On 27/05/2023 00:43, Nicholas Clark wrote: I have a cysteine residue that is oxidized and needs to be modeled as CSO. In the past, when "replace residue" was used to substitute for CSO, the CSO would "behave" during real-space refinement and essentially take the place of the Cys. However, when

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Nicholas Clark
Hi Jon, Thanks for the reply. They’re going in as HETATMs. I didn’t try changing them to ATOMs because I checked my previous structure’s PDB file (one that worked fine) and they were in it as HETATMs. I have changed them to ATOMs and it’s still “misbehaving” in real space refinement but shows a “

Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Jon Cooper
Hello, is the CSO going into the PDB file as ATOM'S or HETATM's? Best wishes, Jon Cooper. jon.b.coo...@protonmail.com Sent from Proton Mail mobile Original Message On 27 May 2023, 00:43, Nicholas Clark wrote: > I have a cysteine residue that is oxidized and needs to be modeled

[ccp4bb] Issue with CSO in Coot & Refmac

2023-05-26 Thread Nicholas Clark
I have a cysteine residue that is oxidized and needs to be modeled as CSO. In the past, when "replace residue" was used to substitute for CSO, the CSO would "behave" during real-space refinement and essentially take the place of the Cys. However, when Cys is replaced by CSO now the CSO is behaving