I am not sure where this was getting at, but i would just point out to
you that continuum electrostatics (that you refer to) tend to
overestimate the "desolvation" penalties (that is if you assume the
whole protein interior has a dielectric of 2-4. while there may be
other benefits for the
You might want to try acetonitrile.
annie
Annie Hassell
Glaxo Smithkline
5 Moore Drive
RTP, NC 27709
919/483-3228
919/483-0368 (FAX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Heng Chiat Tai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "CCP4 bulletin board"
16-Oct-2008 16:15
Please respond to "Heng Chiat Tai" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
I have a protein crystallized in 30% PEG8000/2000 mM NaCl/Tris pH 7.0. The
crystal is not single but twinned long rod.
I tried glycerol and dioxane, but it doesn't work. Try to change pH also same.
Any suggestion?
Any paper mention provide systematic strategy for solving this protein
Hi Nader,
By significant, I mean those interactions that withstand the normal
structural fluctuations of the structure. In MD simulation, two ion-pairs at
a distance of 8 A won't stay for long and will disappear early during the
simulation. So, they cannot be considered as non-bonded interactions
*
Dear Francisco,
1.Transfer of a salt bridge from water to nonpolar environment costs ~10 -
16 kcal/mol (B. Honig and W. L. Hubell, 1984, PNAS 81, 5412-5416).
2.The energy penalty paid due to the desolvation of the charged residues may
not be recovered by favorable interaction among the charged
The problem lies with your definition of "significant".
If it is non null, then any interaction is significant (dual-pan balance
concept).
Coulomb's energy is a function of 1/r^2, therefore at 8 Angs, it is
still 15% of Emax.
Even H-bonds are sometimes considered relevant up to 5 Angs.
Nadir M
Yes, it is electrostatic interaction. But when searching for a salt-bridge
in a protein structure it won't be considered a significant non-bonded
interactions at 8 A distance. Also, the electrostatic interaction extends
beyond 8 A. For a significant interaction the distance need to be < 8A.
Ibra
--
Pr. Nadir T. Mrabet
Cellular & Molecular Biochemistry
INSERM U-724
Nancy University, School of Medicine
9, Avenue de la Foret de Haye, BP 184
54505 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy Cedex
France
Phone: +33 (0)3.83.68.32.73
Fax: +33 (0)3.83.68.32.79
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
You can find more information about salt-bridges in the following
references:
1) Ion-pairs in Proteins. JMB, 168, 867-885 (1983) - Thornton
2) Investigation of Salt Bridge Stability in a Generalized Born solvent
model. JCTC, 2, 115-127 (2006) - Carlos Simmerling
3) Evaluation of Salt Bri
Hi all,
First of all, let me apoligize for this off-topic question but I would
like to use Turbo in stereo to build structures but unfortunately, I am
unable to do so.
I have stereo for pymol, coot and O but not for Turbo, which is my
favourite program at the moment.
I am running Ubuntu Hardy
Dear Fransico,
*Salt bridges are close range electrostatic interaction which depend on
conformer population.
*S.Jayashankar
Research Student
Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Hannover Medical School
Germany.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Chavas Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Franci
Dear all,
I would like to draw your attention to a scientific computing position
currently open at AstraZeneca. This is a fixed term position in the
Computational Chemistry group in Alderley Park to support the high-performance
computing environment as part of the system administration team.
J
Dear Joe
one thing that has helped me a lot with similar problems is G.
Kleywegt's SPASM - you make your best guess of the mainchain then add a total
guess of the sidechains (say with mutate in COOT - choosing the top rotamer).
Then you cut out the loop and run this in SPASM as a s
People dont read the CCP4 documentation on twinning! Grrr
PG P3 can have 3 twinning operators; and these are:
k,h,-l ( or symm equiv) - if this is a crystallographic operator the
PG becomes P321
-h,-k,l (or symm equiv) - if this is a crystallographic operator the PG
becomes P6
-k,-h,-l (or sy
Hi,
I tried to processed it as P321. It seemed that it might be right. The
Rmerge increased
just a little. Then I used phenix.xtriage and sfcheck to check it. The
results are as following:
phenix.xtriage:
Twinning and intensity statistics summary (acentric data):
Statistics independent of twin
15 matches
Mail list logo