bug#41577: closed (Re: bug#41577: automatic alignment)

Much better, but IMHO there is still room for improvement. It could say (for example) (parted) mkpart primary 10s 19s Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performance. Suggested is sectors 100352 .. 198655 Accept/Reject? Just a suggestion, of course. Regard

bug#35715: closed (Re: bug#35715: parted crashed when extended partition doesn't start on physical sector boundary)

Jens Schmidt writes: > OK. Thank you. > > But I can't believe that a segmentation fault is the common way to say > that a partition table doesn't conform to your reference setting. It was an assertion failure, not a seg fault.

bug#35715: closed (Re: bug#35715: parted crashed when extended partition doesn't start on physical sector boundary)

OK. Thank you. But I can't believe that a segmentation fault is the common way to say that a partition table doesn't conform to your reference setting. Am 16.05.2019, 18:05 schrieb help-debb...@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System): > Your bug report > > #35715: parted crashed when extended partiti

bug#25198: closed (Re: bug#25198: bug: assertion (metadata_length > 0) failed)

; GNU Bug Tracking System > Contact help-debb...@gnu.org with problems > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Phil Susi > To: Rauno Viskus , 25198-d...@debbugs.gnu.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:17:05 -0400 > Subject: Re: bug#25198: bug: asserti

bug#18147: closed (Re: bug#18147: parted-3.2 build failure)

The referenced fix is incorrect. The bug that my patch addressed was actually fixed by 7e87ca3c531228d35e13e802d2622006138b104c: libparted/arch/linux.c: Compile without ENABLE_DEVICE_MAPPER", also byFelix Janda. On 15/04/16 01:49, GNU bug Tracking System wrote: > Your bug report > > #18

bug#19137: Antw: Re: bug#19137: mklabel gpt created invalid Protective MBR

>>> Håkon Løvdal schrieb am 21.11.2014 um 17:02 in Nachricht : > On 21 November 2014 08:50, Ulrich Windl > wrote: >> GNU Parted 2.3 creates an invalid Protective MBR (for a 3MB test image): > > Hi. Version 2.3 is quite old, can you reproduce this with the latest > version, 3.2? parted-3.2 has s

bug#18984: Antw: Re: bug#18984: Enhancement request: Handling, of damaged partition tables

On 11/11/2014 12:01 PM, ps...@ubuntu.com wrote: I've known for some time that Windows is stupid and doesn't care about overlapping partitions. What I still can't figure out is how people sometimes manage to create them. Have you ever used partition magic on this disk? What other partitioning

bug#18984: Antw: Re: bug#18984: Enhancement request: Handling of damaged partition tables

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2014 2:57 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: dE schrieb am 08.11.2014 um 06:25 in Nachricht > <545da93a.4090...@gmail.com>: [...] >> Can you provide a screenshot of Windows disk management utility? > > You'll have to cope with the German Vers

bug#18984: Antw: Re: bug#18984: Enhancement request: Handling of damaged partition tables

>>> Phillip Susi schrieb am 10.11.2014 um 19:15 in Nachricht <546100aa.1050...@ubuntu.com>: [...] >> 1) Instead of saying "Can't have a partition outside the disk!" >> say _which_ partition you think is outside the disk, and say _why_ >> you think so. > > I suppose that could be nice, though when

bug#16566: closed (Re: bug#16566: Parted off-by-one error when using "-a none" or "-a min")

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/31/2014 12:47 AM, Марк Коренберг wrote: > Sorry, I have checked in Gentoo. This bug was already fixed. How I > can find when it was fixed (version, commit...)? You can look through the git logs. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.

bug#16566: closed (Re: bug#16566: Parted off-by-one error when using "-a none" or "-a min")

king System > Contact help-debb...@gnu.org with problems > > > -- Пересылаемое сообщение -- > From: Phillip Susi > To: "Марк Коренберг" , 16566-d...@debbugs.gnu.org > Cc: > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:36:24 -0500 > Subject: Re: bug#16566: Parted off-by-on

Re: Bug in parted (2.3 with Lubuntu 12.04.)

Hi, I could'nt compile / make parted 3.1, because of my linux box, but a recent gparted was fine to do what i needed. I will reinstall my linux box and try again with parted 3.1 thanks for your help. best regards. Aurélyen Daudet - Enseignement Nuke & Compositing adau...@artfx.fr - http://ww

Re: Bug in parted (2.3 with Lubuntu 12.04.)

On 24 July 2013 11:21, Aurelyen Daudet wrote: > > Hello, > > i'm using parted 2.3 with Lubuntu 12.04. > Hi. Version 2.3 is from 2010, while the latest version, 3.1, is from last year. Could you try with that and see if you can reproduce the issue? You can download from http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/part

Re: bug report

I'm not sure I can. It is software to recover/flash the hardware. I wish I knew how to fix it. Georgia On Jun 5, 2013 11:18 AM, "Brian C. Lane" wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:02:22PM -1000, Georgia Nelsen wrote: > > version 1.8.9 > > Assertion (cluster >= 2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_co

Re: bug report

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:02:22PM -1000, Georgia Nelsen wrote: > version 1.8.9 > Assertion (cluster >= 2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_count + 2) at > clac.c:378 in function fat_cluster_to_frag() failed. > > thanks > Georgia Thanks for the report, but v1.8.9 is *really* old at this point. You s

Re: [BUG] I broke a disk using parted, so now parted crashes when using the disk

Peter Maloney wrote: > Forgot to include version. > > peter:/mnt # parted -v > parted (GNU parted) 2.4 Thanks. As suspected, the bug you reported has been fixed since that release. With 3.1, you should be fine. > Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version

Re: [BUG] I broke a disk using parted, so now parted crashes when using the disk

Peter Maloney wrote: ... > peter:/mnt # parted /dev/sdb unit s print > Backtrace has 13 calls on stack: > 13: /usr/lib64/libparted.so.0(ped_assert+0x2e) [0x7fb751212a6e] > 12: /usr/lib64/libparted.so.0(ped_geometry_read+0x80) [0x7fb75121a1e0] > 11: /usr/lib64/libparted.so.0(ped_geometry_read_

Re: [BUG] I broke a disk using parted, so now parted crashes when using the disk

Forgot to include version. peter:/mnt # parted -v parted (GNU parted) 2.4 Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later . This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the

Re: bug-parted Digest, Vol 118, Issue 10

On 09/23/2012 12:00 PM, bug-parted-requ...@gnu.org wrote: ... > > Leaving that aside (assuming the authors mean "greater than > or equal to 92"), I don't read this as meaning that the > HeaderSize must be 92 for the current version of the GPT > table; it clearly states that the value must be

Re: bug partedUtil in ESXi 5.0

> +, Memenza, David wrote: > > /dev/disks # partedUtil fix > vml.02200087097ae1583233355f48 > > Warning: Device /dev/disks/naa.200087097ae1 has a > logical sector size of 520.  Not all parts of GNU > Parted support this at the > > moment, and the working code is HIGHLY EXPERIMEN

Re: bug partedUtil in ESXi 5.0

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 06:10:37PM +, Memenza, David wrote: > /dev/disks # partedUtil fix vml.02200087097ae1583233355f48 > Warning: Device /dev/disks/naa.200087097ae1 has a logical sector size of > 520. Not all parts of GNU Parted support this at the > moment, and the working

Re: Bug in GNU Parted?

Robert Stagner wrote: > While using GNU parted version 2.3, I encountered the following message > > (parted) print > Error: Invalid argument during seek for read on /dev/sdb1 > Retry/Ignore/Cancel? R > Error: Invalid argument during seek for read on /dev/sdb1 > Retry/Ignore/Cancel? I > Error: The b

Re: Bug Report for ver 1.8.9

On 18 March 2012 03:09, Nileshwar, Siddharth wrote: > I received this message  for version 1.8.9 This version is very, very old and a lot of problems have been fixed since then. I recommend to try the latest version (3.1 as of now). ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/ BR Håkon Løvdal

Re: Bug with SLES11 SP2 on HP G6 server.

On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:49:15AM +0200, Clive Rothery wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, I will do that as could be good warning for others > upgrading. My main motivation is fix SLES11-SP2 :) Thanks, Petr -- Petr Uzel IRC: ptr_uzl @ freenode pgpL8Y8zaCC2o.pgp Description: PGP signat

Re: Bug with SLES11 SP2 on HP G6 server.

Thanks for the feedback, I will do that as could be good warning for others upgrading. Clive rothery On Thursday, April 5, 2012, Petr Uzel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 07:32:51AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > > clive.rothery wrote: > > > When running partprobe on SLES , the following error o

Re: Bug with SLES11 SP2 on HP G6 server.

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 07:32:51AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > clive.rothery wrote: > > When running partprobe on SLES , the following error occurs. > > As the subject says SLES 11 SP2, with a G6 server. The disks are on a > > cciss > > controller. > > > > Firmware version > > > > Current Firmw

Re: Bug with SLES11 SP2 on HP G6 server.

clive.rothery wrote: > When running partprobe on SLES , the following error occurs. > As the subject says SLES 11 SP2, with a G6 server. The disks are on a cciss > controller. > > Firmware version > > Current Firmware: 2.05 12/16/2010 > > This is the message reported after running a fdsik then

Re: bug

On 12-02-10 11:40 PM, julio wrote: Se ha detectado un error en GNU Parted. Vaya al sitio web de parted http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html para obtener información sobre qué puede ser útil enviar. Envíe un informe por correo a bug-parted@gnu.org que contenga al menos la versión (2.2

Re: BUG: Parted crash during kernel upgrade

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:52:08PM -0800, David Whelan wrote: > I am running KDE Pclinuxos on a live usb stick.  When attempting to upgrade > the kernel I received this at the beginning of the process: > > While installing package kernel-2.6.38.8-pclos3.bfs-1-1pclos2011: > > A bug has been detec

Re: Bug in parted with GPT partition table from Lenovo Ideapad A1

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 01:10:17PM +, Markall, Graham wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use gparted to examine what I believe is a partition table from > the Lenovo Ideapad A1. I've uploded a file containing the partition table to > http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~grm08/ideapad/mbr16GB.img (md5: > 0b

RE: Bug in parted with GPT partition table from Lenovo Ideapad A1

Hi Jim, > Thanks for reporting that. > Here are two related patches. > Either in isolation should avoid that failed assertion. > I'll probably write a test to demonstrate, eventually. I've tried this with a couple of different but similarly-strange GPT partition tables from the Ideapad A1 and I

Re: Bug in parted with GPT partition table from Lenovo Ideapad A1

Markall, Graham wrote: > I'm trying to use gparted to examine what I believe is a partition table from > the Lenovo Ideapad A1. I've uploded a file containing the partition table to > http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~grm08/ideapad/mbr16GB.img (md5: > 0b236b16e98de53393f6539c40ba1201). > > When I use the

RE: Bug in parted with GPT partition table from Lenovo Ideapad A1

Hi Rod, Thanks for your reply! > The use you've presented is invalid, for two related reasons. The first > problem is that GPT places partition data at both the start AND THE END > of the disk, and without BOTH sets of data, the GPT as a whole is > broken. Since you're feeding a small (128 KiB) p

Re: Bug in parted with GPT partition table from Lenovo Ideapad A1

On 12/30/2011 12:00 PM, Graham Markall wrote: > > I'm trying to use gparted to examine what I believe is a partition table from > the Lenovo Ideapad A1. I've uploded a file containing the partition table to > http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~grm08/ideapad/mbr16GB.img (md5: > 0b236b16e98de53393f6539c40b

Re: [Bug Report] partprobe

On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 08:57:41PM -0400, HyoGi Sim wrote: > It printed the following message and is dead. > > === > > Backtrace has 13 calls on stack: > 13: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0(ped_assert+0x2b) [0xb76c1733] > 12: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0(+0x

Re: Bug in gpt_probe()

Any thoughts on this ? Did anyone get a chance to look at this ? thanks, rahul --- On Mon, 1/8/11, rahul dev wrote: > From: rahul dev > Subject: Re: Bug in gpt_probe() > To: "Brian C. Lane" > Cc: bug-parted@gnu.org > Date: Monday, 1 August, 2011, 11:30 PM > Yeah

Re: Bug report

p...@tommy-wurzbacher.de wrote: > I've tried to flash my HP TouchPad with HP's tool webosdoctor and got this > error: > > 28.08.2011 00:01:08 com.palm.nova.installer.recoverytool.CardController > logPrint > INFO: Trenchcoat: A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the > web site of pa

Re: Bug in gpt_probe()

wrote: > From: Brian C. Lane > Subject: Re: Bug in gpt_probe() > To: "rahul dev" > Cc: bug-parted@gnu.org > Date: Monday, 1 August, 2011, 10:29 PM > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:00:58AM > +0530, rahul dev wrote: > > Guys, > > > >   Looks like ther

Re: Bug in gpt_probe()

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:00:58AM +0530, rahul dev wrote: > Guys, > > Looks like there is a bug in gpt_probe(). In case it reads the primary > header successfully but doesn't find a gpt signature, it returns 0 and > doesn't check for the secondary gpt table. > > This seems to be a serious bu

Re: Bug report

This has been fixed in parted v2.4 The problem is that parted has failed to guess the CHS layout of the disk. You can work around this problem (assuming you can erase the data on the disk) by removing the partitioning and re-partitioning it with parted. dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/diskname bs=1M cou

Re: Bug Report

Richard Gradle wrote: > While trying to install linux software (LXDE-PCLinuxOS) on my computer, I > encountered the following that requested that I send an error report. I was > trying to install the software on a HDD that was already partitioned as an > ext4 > drive. The installer crashed befo

Re: bug reporting is not easy enough

Jon Bendtsen wrote: > If you want more bug-reports, you should make it easier to find out if there > are duplicates. Searching for the word bug in my browser window at > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/parted/ reveals no link, no nothing. > > Anyway, here is the bug report, treat it as you wish:

Re: Bug report

Thanks a lot for your quick and clear answer, I´ll try. 2011/2/13 Curtis Gedak > On 11-02-13 03:43 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote: > >> Thanks, is there anything I can do for using that Flashdrive with parted >> or is it impossible? >> > > Carlos, > > I can see at least two possible solutions:

Re: Bug report

On 11-02-13 03:43 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote: Thanks, is there anything I can do for using that Flashdrive with parted or is it impossible? Carlos, I can see at least two possible solutions: OPTION A) One work-around is as follows: 1) Copy any data you have on this disk device to anoth

Re: Bug report

Thanks, is there anything I can do for using that Flashdrive with parted or is it impossible? 2011/2/11 Curtis Gedak > Carlos, > > Using the equations noted in the probe_partition_for_geom() method in the > parted file libparted/labels/dos.c, I ran the calculations using the values > from the MB

Re: Bug report

Carlos, Using the equations noted in the probe_partition_for_geom() method in the parted file libparted/labels/dos.c, I ran the calculations using the values from the MBR you provided. Variable Description / Calculation Value c Starting cylinder 1 h Starting head 0 s Starting sector – 1 = 0 a

Re: Bug report

Curtis, Here you have...and I paste its content just in case you prefer not to open the file: FA 31 C0 8E D8 8E D0 BC 00 7C 89 E6 06 57 8E C0 .1...|...W.. 0010 FB FC BF 00 06 B9 00 01 F3 A5 EA 1F 06 00 00 52 ...R 0020 52 B4 41 BB AA 55 31 C9 30 F6 F9 CD 13 72 1

Re: Bug report

Carlos, Would you be able to provide a copy of the Master Boot Record which is contained in the first sector of the device? You can capture the Master Boot Record in a file with the following command: NOTE: Be extra careful to type this command in properly, otherwise loss of data could resul

Re: Bug report

Yes. But fdisk output is: *17 heads*, 17 sectors per track I supposed that that was the value to compare with head_size<=63 but I must be wrong. 2011/2/2 Brian C. Lane > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:47:21PM +0100, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Version 2.3 > > > > Error message

Re: Bug report

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:47:21PM +0100, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote: > Hello, > > Version 2.3 > > Error message: The sentence (head_size <= 63) in > ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:662 in the function > probe_partition_for_geom() has failed. > Aborted > This is yet another example of a flash

Re: Bug report

My apologies for sending this again. But I have not received any answer (perhaps my fault, because i ask for entering the mailing list at the same time...). If someone sent it I would ask him to send it again. I add now the output of fdisk $ sudo fdisk -l -u /dev/sdg Disco /dev/sdg: 3997 MB,

Re: Bug on Fdisk

Ricardo Martinez wrote: > I cannot use fdisk, and it show me an error of GNU Fdisk. I figured out that > was > a flash memory the problem. > > When I try fdisk without the USB Stick, it goes well. > > When I try run fdisk /dev/sdb (the flash memory), I get this: > > $ sudo fdisk /dev/sdb > GNU Fd

Re: Re: Bug

This issue seems to have been reported a few times to the bug mailing list, but then forgotten. We have amassed several bug reports with this issue in Ubuntu, so I was wondering if you could take a look at some of them to see if anything gives you a clue, and ask users for more information. S

Re: bug during print

[best to keep the list Cc'd, so others can follow along] Grgur Tokic wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Thanks a lot for your reply! It finally shed some light on otherwise totally > confusing situation for me. > > I was doubting that the old version of parted might be an issue but I had > troubles with linking

Re: bug during print

Grgur Tokic wrote: > I've encoutered this message when trying to print the information about a disk > with gpt label, previously formated using the same instance of parted. > > > You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to > bug-parted@gnu.org > containing the version (1.6.19), an

Re: bug during print

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:59:36PM -0500, Grgur Tokic wrote: > Hi, > > I've encoutered this message when trying to print the information about a disk > with gpt label, previously formated using the same instance of parted. > > > You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to > bug

Re: bug during print

On 9 December 2010 02:59, Grgur Tokic wrote: > You found a bug in GNU Parted.  Please email a bug report to > bug-parted@gnu.org > containing the version (1.6.19), and the following message: Hi. This version is very old; the newest version is 2.3 which can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gn

Re: Bug#602533: parted sees useless /dev/cciss/ device

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 05:37:23PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: parted > Version: 1.8.8.git.2008.03.24-11.1 > > I'm running this version of parted running on an HP DL165 with > linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem 2.6.26-25lenny1. I have nothing > connected to the CCISS controller; the disks a

Re: bug with linux software raid

Thx for advance. I read the kernel source and found that for newer kernel (2.6.35.4, maybe > 2.6.28), we can just scan /sys/block/`dev'/ext_range to get maximum supported partitions. For extended-partition device, `ext_range' contains value '256' (DISK_MAX_PARTS). For non-extended-partition dev

Re: Bug

C.E. wrote: > Dear Parted team, > > here's a bug report. > > Using Ubuntu 10.04 32bits Netbook Edition. > > > The output of partprobe (GNU parted) 2.2: > * > > Backtrace has 13 calls on stack: > 13: /lib/libparted.so.0(ped_assert+0x2a) [0x13af0a] > 12: /

Re: Bug report parted

holger.spangenb...@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote: > I011-29:/ # partprobe > A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted > http:// > www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more informations of what could be > useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to bug-part

Re: bug report

David Johnson wrote: > /media/ user > Backtrace has 11 calls on stack: > 11: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0(ped_assert+0x29) [0xb7264b29] > 10: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0 [0xb7299cd5] > 9: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0 [0xb729ab47] > 8: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0 [0xb729bf2a] > 7: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0 [0

Re: Bug with rewriting partition table - need help

Jim Meyering wrote: > 27/249 wrote: >> Seems that attached patch fixed this bug. I tested some cases, and >> everything works fine for me, but I'm not sure if it can break >> something hidden, so, developers, please review this fix. >> >> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM, 27/249 wrote: >>> Yes, I fo

Re: Bug with rewriting partition table - need help

27/249 wrote: > Seems that attached patch fixed this bug. I tested some cases, and > everything works fine for me, but I'm not sure if it can break > something hidden, so, developers, please review this fix. > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM, 27/249 wrote: >> Yes, I forgot to add that this bug is

Re: Bug with rewriting partition table - need help

Seems that attached patch fixed this bug. I tested some cases, and everything works fine for me, but I'm not sure if it can break something hidden, so, developers, please review this fix. On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM, 27/249 wrote: > Yes, I forgot to add that this bug is still present in latest

Re: Bug with rewriting partition table - need help

Yes, I forgot to add that this bug is still present in latest GIT tree (checked 1 minute ago). On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:48 PM, 27/249 wrote: > Few weeks ago I described this bug in > http://parted.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/250 > > This bug is very serious for me, so, since I didn'

Re: bug

Hello Joel, On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Joel Granados wrote: > Thx for the bug report :) > > Can you pls expand on what you where doing when you hit this.  What > command were you executing and what your final objective was. > > I don't see any 1.8.9 tags on the git repo.  What distro are you

Re: bug

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:44:37AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Joel, > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Joel Granados wrote: > > Thx for the bug report :) > > > > Can you pls expand on what you where doing when you hit this.  What > > command were you executing and what your final obje

Re: bug

Thx for the bug report :) Can you pls expand on what you where doing when you hit this. What command were you executing and what your final objective was. I don't see any 1.8.9 tags on the git repo. What distro are you using? Note that the latest "stable" release is 1.8.8. http://ftp.gnu.org/gn

Re: [bug-fdisk] Re: Parter error - Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition after fix partition order with fdisk

> I always get this error message when I start parted: > > [r...@laptop ~]# LANG=C parted --list /dev/sda > Error: Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition. > > Model: ATA WDC WD2500BEVS-6 (scsi) > Disk /dev/sdb: 250GB > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B >

Re: bug message asks me to notify you. please be advised i am brand new to Ubuntu and can't help beyond what you direct

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > Peter Costanza wrote: >> X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 166 >>   Major opcode:  144 >>   Minor opcode:  3 >>   Resource id:  0x0 >> Failed to open device >> X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device

Re: Bug???

2009/1/14 : > During an operation with parted, I receive that error message : > Hi. Version 1.6.19 is very old and many bugs have been fixed since then. Could you retry using the latest version (1.8.8) and see if the problem still occurs? http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/download.shtml BR Håko

Re: bug

Hi, Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 16:16 +0100, Jean-Emmanuel BISSEY a écrit : > After installation of ubuntu on my computer, my hard disk has got so > special partitions. (cf as the bottom of this message) > And qtparted don't like it ! Well, in a way, your partition table doesn't look like anyth

Re: Bug

Enrico Bastelli writes: > Assertion (disk != NULL) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1337 in function > ped_disk_next_partition() failed. Which parted version? -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Lin

Re: bug in qtparted

daniel pinda martel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Assertion (disk != NULL) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1319 in function > ped_disk_next_partition() failed Hello, Daniel, 1.7.1 is a pretty old version. Please give a try to our latest release (1.8.8) and report back to us if you can still reproduc

Re: Bug

Denis Borovikov wrote: Environment: kernel 2.6.24.7-0.5.1.smp.gcc3.4.x86.i686, GNU Parted 1.6.22 That release of parted is quite old, current stable release is 1.8.8 available from here: http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/download.shtml You should try to see if you can reproduce the bug in

Re: bug message asks me to notify you. please be advised i am brand new to Ubuntu and can't help beyond what you direct

Peter Costanza wrote: > X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 166 > Major opcode: 144 > Minor opcode: 3 > Resource id: 0x0 > Failed to open device > X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 166 > Major opcode: 144 > Minor opcode: 3 > Resource id

Re: Bug in GNU Parted 1.7.1 ped_disk_next_partition() failed QTparted fails accessing drive with questionable partition table

Additional Info about my bug report: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/media# parted /dev/sdb GNU Parted 1.6.9 --- snip --- Using /dev/sdb Warning: Unable to align partition properly. This probably means that another partitioning tool generated an incorrect partition table, because it didn't have the correct BI

Re: Bug report

JJK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of > parted http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more > informations of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email > a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the

Re: Bug report for parted 1.6.9

Jim Meyering wrote: Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As requested by the parted program, I'm sending this bug report. Thanks for the report. Since that version is so old, and since the bug matches a common signature, I think it's been fixed for a while. Yeah, I suspected as much. For

Re: Bug report for parted 1.6.9

Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As requested by the parted program, I'm sending this bug report. > > The device in question is an AoE device, built from 10 400GB hard > drives, configured into a RAID10 array. There are *no* existing > partition tables or GPT disk labels on the device. >

Re: bug report for parted

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > GNU Parted 1.6.19 ... > Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:582 in function > probe_partition_for_geom() failed. > Ignore/Cancel? Thanks for reporting that. 1.6.19 is pretty old. I'm pretty sure that particular bug is fixed in newer versions. The

Re: bug report

Bonie, could you please try the latest stable release -- 1.8.8? It looks like you were having problems using GPT disk-labels. Happy hacking, Debarshi -- GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7 Key server: pgp.mit.edu ___ bug-parted mailing list bug-parted@gnu.org http:/

Re: Bug

Tomek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > SLAX running on MS VirtualPC 2007 > version: 1.6.22 > > Assertion (head size <=63) at disk_dos.c:573 in function > probe_partiotion_for_geom() failed Please, test the new 1.8.8 release. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R ---

Re: bug

On 10/09/2007, coos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As you can see below i was asked to send you the message below. > > Failed to open device > Error: Kan niet aan alle voorwaarden voor deze partitie voldoen. > U bent tegen een programmeerfout in GNU Parted aangelopen. Zie de > website van Parted (h

Re: Bug detected

On 9/10/07, Salvatore De Paolis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > ped_partition_get_name msdos > > A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted > http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more informations of what > could be useful for bug submitting! Plea

Re: bug report

Oleg, you are using really old version of GNU Parted. We are just about to release version 1.8.8. You could try some later version from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/ Thanks for the report anyway. :-) Cheers, Debarshi -- GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7 Key server: pgp.mit.edu _

Re: Bug-report

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl-Heinz Hoffmann) writes: > Assertion (disk != NULL) at ../..libparted/disk.c:1319 in function > ped_disk_next_partition() failed. This do not includes the version number but if it's not our lastest release (1.8.7), please try it and report a new bug if it still happens. --

Re: Bug?

On 6/10/07, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if this is a bug or not. I've just expanding a hardware raid > array to 3000GB and I'm trying to expand the partition table from 2250 > to 3000GB. I'm getting an error when trying to expand i

Re: Bug?

David Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if this is a bug or not. I've just expanding a hardware raid > array to 3000GB and I'm trying to expand the partition table from 2250 > to 3000GB. I'm getting an error when trying to expand it. > > GNU Parted 1.7.1 > Using /dev/sda > Welcome to

Re: Bug in GNU Parted version 1.6.19.

Eric Gillmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bug in GNU Parted version 1.6.19. > > # parted /dev/sde print > You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to > bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.19), and the following > message: > > Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S

Re: bug report

On 19/02/07, Naved Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Please chek this error. A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Please email a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the version (1.6.19) and the following message:Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:582 i

Re: bug in parted-1.8.2

Same issue in 1.8.6. The -s option used to just it do it and not ask any questions. wget http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/parted-1.8.6.tar.bz2 tar -jxvpf parted-1.8.6.tar.bz2 cd parted-1,8.6/ ./configure make export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./libparted/.libs ./parted/parted -s /dev/hdc "mklabel msdos \ mkpa

Re: bug in parted-1.8.2

John Stile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was asked to send mail to this address in regard to incorrect behayver > of parted in gentoo package parted-1.8.2 Currently we're on 1.8.6. Would be good if you could try this last release and report back to us. Is it possible? -- O T A V I O

Re: Bug report

Hi, Thanks for the report. I got the following message when repartitioning my disk. Could you give us some more details about what you were doing? You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.21), and the following message: I

Re: bug report

Alex Prinsier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I just installed qtparted on ubuntu edgy, ran it as root and I got this > error: > > Error: Can't have overlapping partitions. > A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted > http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parte

Re: bug with parted

Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the version is 1.7.1 and the prompt sais: > > Assertion (disk != NULL) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1319 in function > ped_disk_next_partition() failed. > bad data in /proc/uptime > > I tried to access a s1mp3 usb-mp4-player (chinese one). Thanks for the report. Thi

Re: Bug Report

You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.3), and the following message: Please use the latest stable release 1.8.2, let us know if this is solved. Happy hacking, Debarshi -- After the game the king and the pawn go into the same

Re: Bug report

Dan Bretherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear Parted developers, > > Please note the following error message, which appeared on starting parted. Hello Dan, Please, in your report there's no evidence of what version of Parted you were using. Please, test if this specific problem wasn't fix on

Re: bug in GNU Parted(1.6.21)

On 07/01/07, leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi parted gave the following message: You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.21), and the following message: Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../libparted/disk_dos.c:1935 in fu

  1   2   >