exist. Please could someone try to reproduce this.
Yes I can reproduce this too.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
In the following:
\version "2.14.2"
\score {
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
\set Staff.keySignature = #`(((0 . 4) . ,SHARP) ((0 . 3) . ,SHARP))
\clef treble
c8 a c d
%%% Commenting out the following line solves the problem %%%
\clef bass
e fis d c
}
\layout {}
On Aug 14, 2012, at 5:00 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> james writes:
>
> So I fail to make _any_ sense of your example. If I had to guess, I'd
> say the octave specifications are there for overriding the default
> octaves chosen by the key signature engraver, but withou
actly! Eluze
>
> Windows shell quoting. It's a known bug.
No, it's just a limitation of Microsoft's implementation of the 'cmd'
application - which I believe is not actually a true shell. It is not
specific to LilyPond - try doing any complex 'a
-quoted for the case of file
> names with spaces; then it is
>
> FOR %x IN (*.ly) DO lilypond "%x" 1>"%~nx.out" 2>"%~nx.log"
>
> Eluze
>
what happens if you run cmd /S /C and just quote the whole command
without all the extra quotes?
James
___
Hello,
On 20 August 2012 22:29, eluze wrote:
>
> James-387 wrote
>>
>>
>>
>> what happens if you run cmd /S /C and just quote the whole command
>> without all the extra quotes?
>>
>>
> I'm not sure if I understand correctly:
>
> when
On Sep 6, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
-dno-point-and-click was exactly what I was looking for;
lilypond --help had not revealed that wisdom.
>>>
>>> Indeed, it is missing for `lilypond -dhelp'. Looks like a bug...
>>>
>>
>> if you enter /lilypond help/ you get
>>
>> Op
I may be talking in ignorance, but wasn't there an issue with one or
two distributions because of Guile 1.8 and 2.0 incompatibilities.
I did pester the Ubuntu lists myself when 2.14/5 was out. And someone
did repackage something (I seem to recall it was an early 2.12 or a
late 2.10 in the repository until recently).
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
gave error exit status 2
--snip--
So without the snippet log I cannot really tell, but it doesn't look
that clean to start with. Maybe someone else can care comment?
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hello,
On 2 October 2012 17:24, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 06:21 PM, James wrote:
>>
>> So without the snippet log I cannot really tell, but it doesn't look
>> that clean to start with. Maybe someone else can care comment?
>
>
> Do you have
On 2 October 2012 17:54, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 06:40 PM, James wrote:
>>
>> Well unless they are using 1GB of RAM, I personally have not had any
>> problems with 2GB or RAM. So I'd find it hard to believe it was RAM.
>
>
> AFAICS they&#
never been synchronized with other Linux
Distros, if we did that, LSR would still be at 2.10.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
you,
> Jonas
>
This has already been dealt with I think
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2876
'star' the issue yourself and I believe you will get an email on any update to
thread or status.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
lity.
>
and don't forget to use convert-ly (just in case)!
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/usage-big-page#updating-files-with-convert_002dly
The spacing algorithms are much, much better now, it's worth it just
for that alone :)
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
\lower
> }
> >>
>
> \layout { }
>
> }
>
> }
>
You should at least use current stable (2.16).
This is what I get when I use that and your example.
I cannot see for example where your 'tempo' mark
l-headers true?
>
> I don't think they're nedded
>
Me either.
author James Lowe
Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:14:21 + (20:14 +0100)
committer James Lowe
Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:14:21 + (20:14 +0100)
commit 7270930bc3abc30bfe84f75118674d63536bf4fa
Didn't think it
ilypond/issues/detail?id=2921
and attached your patch.
As I have push access, I'll prepare a patch and put it up for review
(as per our process) for you. I'll make sure you are credited with the
authorship when it eventually gets pushed.
It may take a week or so overall but I'll ma
Hello,
On 23 October 2012 12:12, ArnoldTheresius wrote:
> James wrote
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 23 October 2012 11:29, Wendl, Arnold <
>
>> Arnold.Wendl@
>
>> > wrote:
>>>>ugly, or enhancement request
>>>
>>> I think the "
Arnold
I think this might be better on dev list than bug so I am ccing dev in
case you are not subscribed to that list yet.
On 23 October 2012 12:54, ArnoldTheresius wrote:
> James wrote
>> Hello,
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Well I have applied this patch and I am not
re "update the existing docs in the manual to
> reflect the change".
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2922
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Arnold,
On 24 October 2012 16:39, ArnoldTheresius wrote:
> James wrote
>> Arnold
>>
>> I think this might be better on dev list than bug so I am ccing dev in
>> case you are not subscribed to that list yet.
>>
>> ...
>> James
>>
>> __
Are you using the same *.ly file on both your Mac and Windows machine?
Are you copying/pasting the informational between systems or moving
the file somehow?
Else I'd check things like linefeed or hidden characters in your *.ly
file compared on both Operati
/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2538
>
> Thanks
> --
> Federico
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
When you run 'configure', it should warn you this is missing.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypon
decipher things like the following
> without one:
>
> lilypond [option]… file…
>
> -d[option-name]=[value],--define-default=[option-name]=[value]
>
> Thanks for considering these. I imagine I am not the only one making a first
> foray into the command-lin
y example it would help.
Also perhaps some output of what the '..problems' are?
Oh.. and what Operating System you are running on.
There isn't enough information here.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lis
ant to discourage you, there are people who will help, but at
some point you might as well take a few minutes to learn the work flow
and the testing and reviews will just happen.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Zefram,
On 24 December 2012 17:07, Zefram wrote:
> James wrote:
>>It is as much work for you to upload your own patches to Rietveld
>
> That's a bit too Web 2.0 for my comfort. I'm not drinking the Google
> Kool-Aid.
Your choice, you don't have to have a gmail
Hello,
On 24 December 2012 18:12, Zefram wrote:
> James wrote:
>>Your choice, you don't have to have a gmail account, just a login to reitveld.
>
> How do I acquire a Rietveld account that won't be linked to any other
> application?
>The website says "si
gt; bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3060
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
someone to put it on Rietveld for you - I will do it if none of them can)
> and, if nobody complains, will go on a countdown and will be pushed to the
> master branch by one of our developers.
>
> Cheers,
> MS
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/det
warn. Attached patch fixes.
>
> -zefram
>
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3062
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hello
On 25 December 2012 05:45, Zefram wrote:
> James wrote:
>>Cannot find the patch that this supposedly sits on top of.
>
> I sent the prior patch to bug-lilypond with subject "grace note
> articulation". Thanks for doing the paperwork on these issues.
>
ht
few days what information I can gather from CG or
> the
> Google issue tracker
>
There may not be anything useful at this time - I haven't checked but Colin
said he would update the CG guide with this information (or at least what
he does) before he finishes this weekend.
regards
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
nd.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n139479/aligningText%2Bscore.preview.png
> >
>
> the main problem remaining is to align the text to the middle staff line -
> how can this be automated?
I haven't tried it but could you could use \tuning as a 'rehearsal mark' at
that bar line in
ink this needs a tracker, I'll fix it and push it directly to
staging now.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:17 AM, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> Eluze writes:
>
>> with
>>
>> \relative {
>> \voiceOne
>> \grace a'8
>> c4 c c c
>> }
>>
>> the stem direction of the following notes is wrong
>>
>> this doesn't happen if the grace is not the first note or by repeating
>> \voiceOne after
d prompt sits there? what?)
What does task manager show for example?
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hello,
On 15 February 2013 16:18, Eluze wrote:
> James wrote
> > hello,
> >
> > On 15 February 2013 15:03, Eluze <
>
> > eluzew@
>
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> if in the command-line I enter
> >>
> >> /lilypond/ or /lilypond
erver when I compile it.
What is the spec of your computer you are compiling it under as that may
also be telling.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hello,
On 19 February 2013 10:06, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "James" wrote in message news:CA+T3wFm6ocUSfVyd=**
> 8NiivObLnQPo31HmME_eFvCm_**f4snu...@mail.gmail.com...
> Miguel,
>
>
> I have a quite powerful desktop and use Linux, but I only saw 1 CPU being
>>
Hello,
On 19 February 2013 13:31, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: James
> To: Phil Holmes
> Cc: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Error when compiling a large file
>
>
> Hello,
>>
>
> Ye
Hello,
On 20 February 2013 07:56, ArnoldTheresius wrote:
> Miguel Jesus wrote
> > James,
> >
> > I couldn't get it to compile even when I try to compile th whole score.
> >
> > That means the problem is on my side. I have to check the jEdit
> > de
On Feb 24, 2013, at 12:12 PM, yvand wrote:
> Le 24/02/2013 02:19, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>> 2013/2/24 yvand :
>>> Hi lilypond developpers,
>>>
>>> I wanted to type the well-known composition "Für Elise" in lilypond for a
>>> friend.
>>> Unfortunately, the PDF generated by lilypond was damaged
an/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
> That's me...
> I'll try to post a fix tonight or tomorrow.
>
> Cheers,
> MS
>
>
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3269&thanks=3269
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
est Frescobaldi?
This is a third party LilyPond IDE with a lot of nice features.
http://frescobaldi.org/
It has all that point and click niceness built into its own interface.
Hope this helps.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
at I quickly
found. I am sure this has been discussed and probably tracked elsewhere
if not in one of these above.
--
Regards,
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
this gives:
>
> > Processing `test.ly'
> > Parsing...
> > This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual
> way.
> > Please contact the application's support team for more information.
>
> If
Hello,
On 13 May 2013 16:19, Eluze wrote:
> James wrote
> >> If you check in the System event log (application or system) you may get
> > an event at this point with (perhaps) more information in teh dump data
> of
> > teh event itself. It won't mean much to t
t we recommend you look in the Learning Manual.
I don't think this is unreasonable.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
/bug-lilypond
What's the google tracker number?
I don't recall testing this patch.
Did it just get thrown onto the list or did they follow the process for
submitting patches?
--
Regards,
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypo
Urs,
On 21 June 2013 09:40, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 18.06.2013 21:23, schrieb James:
>
> On 18/06/13 19:47, Urs Liska wrote:
>>
>>> Am 15.06.2013 10:10, schrieb Urs Liska:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> as discussed here: http://lis
ist.
Else I am not sure what your actual request is.
Also can you remove absolutely everything that is not needed (i.e. I am
sure the \tiny are not needed to show your 'problem').
It will make it much simpler to understand what it is exactly you ar
.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/redirection.mspx?mfr=true
Do any of these others work? I am guessing this is (yet another) imitation
of the cmd environment and you need to use a different re-direct or some
odd use of quotes.
Out of curiosity
sers than the cmd prompt is. For lilypond though it may be simply a way
for NIX users to run some of the commands on Windows without the unexpected
results.
I've never really tried.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
27;t get this problem. It all looks 'normal' from
building from today's tree.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Thomas,
On 25 August 2013 13:35, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2013/8/25 James :
> > Mark,
> >
> >
> > On 25 August 2013 04:03, Mark Polesky wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, maybe this has been discussed and I missed it, but I
> >> compiled the docs today, and
ed currently that we require.
What version of gs are you using? There was an issue I believe with
Raring Ringtail that David found that had to do with GS, but this
manifested itself in an error than a weird thing like this.
I am just clutching at straws here mind.
james
__
I know this isn't a fix, but it might take some load off of
b...@lilypond.com when/if it eventually becomes mainstream.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
type1/gsfonts/cxx.pfb: Century Schoolbook
L:style=Roman etc.
(where x is a different numeric string).
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
nfo/bug-lilypond
These patches don't apply cleanly to current master.
If you can git format them, then I can shepherd them through our patch
review/test process for you.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 10/11/13 13:34, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
David,
On 10 November 2013 10:29, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
I'll make a patch.
I'm not sure how the process will work (from my own point of view anyway)
as Patchy only tests against master and we've sp
On 10/11/13 11:33, Federico Bruni wrote:
@item -nd --no-articulation-directions
I've done and pushed this
Doc: External.itely - add missing comma
authorJames Lowe
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:14:22 + (10:14 +)
committerJames Lowe
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:15:04 + (10:15
On 11/11/13 10:24, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
On 10/11/13 11:33, Federico Bruni wrote:
@item -nd --no-articulation-directions
I've done and pushed this
Doc: External.itely - add missing comma
authorJames Lowe
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:14:22 + (10:14 +)
comm
fully functional at the moment?
Hello,
I am not bug squad, but I have created
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3656
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
s
http://quixote.nl
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Thank you Jos,
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3657
Some will eventually add this to the website.
James
d be
>
> \chordmode { \key c \major }
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3665
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
preciated, but please don't ask
> me to try 2.16.2. It would not build.
>
What does that mean?
Get 2.16.2 from here
http://lilypond.org/website/download.html
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
t.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
>
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3686
Just so it isn't lost
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
t on the production page of the lilypond
website ?
Yours sincerely
Aurélien Bello
Do you have a URL that we could add (apart from your own personal
website of course)?
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
created/built automatically by scripts (TexInfo)
rather than actually editing HTML code directly so once the edit has gone
through the normal patch process/check and then into the code tree, it will
be part of the built website.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailin
}
>>
\layout { % generate output
}
}
Any chance of you cutting this down to a smaller example?
http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
Thanks
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
g-documentation
I cannot say if that is related to the website, but it is possible.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I didn't see any reply to this.
Did you get one?
If not can you provide a tiny example
http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing
On 15/12/13 12:39, Phil Holmes wrote:
Federico Bruni" wrote in message
news:capjdbpqlx7_xtu8bjxambo5msc7jesevzffcdf9emzpm7_x...@mail.gmail.com...
2013/12/15 Simon Albrecht
Hello,
Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb James:
Simon
On 12/12/13 22:17, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
if bo
't understand Lyrics in LilyPond, but if this person is asking the
question, others might so we need to know if the doc needs improving
(and of course is this intended behavior anyway?).
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
d=3148
off the top of my head.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
- I don't know if dots and accidentals are the same
'family' of attached objects or if it warrants a separate tracker.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hello,
On 21/12/13 07:58, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 20.12.2013 21:25, schrieb James:
On 18/12/13 06:18, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 18.12.2013 07:15, schrieb Mike Solomon:
On Dec 18, 2013, at 1:00 AM, Urs Liska
wrote:
If I parentesize a dotted note with
{ \parenthesize f'2. }
the right
r (i.e. it is a problem to be 'fixed').
Anyway, it is useful I think to mention this somehow in the
documenation, but apart from numerals what other characters would break
LP's syntax in this specific regard?
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 26/12/13 07:51, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
Anyway, it is useful I think to mention this somehow in the
documenation, but apart from numerals what other characters would
break LP's syntax in this specific regard?
Words are formed by letters and non-ASCII characters, with s
On 26/12/13 10:29, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
On 26/12/13 07:51, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
Anyway, it is useful I think to mention this somehow in the
documenation, but apart from numerals what other characters would
break LP's syntax in this specific regard?
Word
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3765
Thanks
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Happy New Year Mike!
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3766
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-l
r, but that's another story.)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3767
Happy New Year
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
639-2 code is vls, another option might be nl-BE?
What do you think?
Cheers,
Joram
___
Thanks I have created:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3771
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
all examples.
thanks
Jan
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Also see:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2476
James
___
ified.
Some of them cannot be distributed by lilypond either, for example,
logo-debian.png is the Debian Restricted Use Logo.[1]
Oops. Yes, we should replace it with the "open use logo".
http://www.debian.org/logos/index.en.html
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail
"did you run convert-ly?".
/Mats
Thank you.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3784
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
.ly
the transparency option is ignored.
I assume this is on 2.18?
Do you know if this was the same in 2.16?
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
/detail?id=2476
Can someone else with Windows try this?
Perhaps Eluze - who reported the initial problems with Windows could try
to work out if we need to double-double quote something somewhere?
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypon
On 07/01/14 12:56, Phil Holmes wrote:
"James" wrote in message
news:52cbef79.7020...@gmail.com...
On 07/01/14 11:57, David Kastrup wrote:
Jan writes:
Hi,
using Lilypond, I can use transparency and resolution _separately_,
but
unfortunately not together.
These two command
, the red should show through :)
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
y for the long report. It was the tinyest example i could build.
>I'm just willing to help lilypond community, which I love!
Hi Andre,
thanks for the report! It definitely is a bug.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3800
Although I am not sure what the proper title should
wn issues and warnings:
"Tags in voices that get quoted may cause hard-to-debug behavior. See
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/writing-parts#quoting-other-voices,
section Known issues and warnings."
I hope this report/suggestion is useful.
Thank you
http://code.g
this same output in 2.18.0?
James
<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
p
I didn't see the reply, so just in case (and for completeness).
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3816
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
that can do the same.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3820
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
file compiles but you
don't get the output you want). That doesn't help anyone, but shows
where the problem line is.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 19/01/14 20:37, Federico Bruni wrote:
2014/1/18 James mailto:pkx1...@gmail.com>>
See attached png from the most recent development build 2.19.1.
Do you get this same output in 2.18.0?
I do
Thanks
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3822
expectable/bug?
Eluze
Does adding \paper { annotate-spacing = ##t } give any new hints? I can
see some 'extra dist' on the second page onwards that is labelled that
isn't on the first.
Also if you change the #5 to #2 (for example) yo
1 - 100 of 909 matches
Mail list logo
