Hello, On 2 October 2012 17:24, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > On 10/02/2012 06:21 PM, James wrote: >> >> So without the snippet log I cannot really tell, but it doesn't look >> that clean to start with. Maybe someone else can care comment? > > > Do you have any remarks on the suspicion given in the bugtracker that it's > because of the very large amounts of memory required to build Lilypond (most > likely lilypond-doc rather than LP itself)?
Well unless they are using 1GB of RAM, I personally have not had any problems with 2GB or RAM. So I'd find it hard to believe it was RAM. James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
