Hello, On 30 September 2012 13:39, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 2:24 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:16 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>>> What is an issue is that nobody offers 2.16 yet. >>>>> [..] >>>> >>>> bah. Can we do something about it except for bugging them? >>> >>> What's wrong with bugging them? >> >> Nothing! I've probably expressed myself not clearly. >> Shall we have a dedicated person for bugging them all, or maybe you >> bugged them already? > > <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686788> > <URL:http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilypond/+bug/1047693> > > Don't know about others.
I may be talking in ignorance, but wasn't there an issue with one or two distributions because of Guile 1.8 and 2.0 incompatibilities. I did pester the Ubuntu lists myself when 2.14/5 was out. And someone did repackage something (I seem to recall it was an early 2.12 or a late 2.10 in the repository until recently). James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
