Il giorno ven 26 mag 2017 alle 12:16, Phil Holmes
ha scritto:
- Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "bug-lilypond"
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Unofficial MusicXML test suite access problem
Clicking o
2017-05-26 12:16 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley"
>
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc: "bug-lilypond"
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 11:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Unofficial MusicXML test suite access problem
>
&
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Morley"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "bug-lilypond"
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Unofficial MusicXML test suite access problem
Clicking on p.e. the first file-name i.e. ‘01a-Pitches-Pitches.xml’
I ge
gd4w1qrak2-7s-cnpxw...@mail.gmail.com...
>>
>> Forwarded to bug-list
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Menu Jacques
>> Date: 2017-05-25 23:07 GMT+02:00
>> Subject: Unofficial MusicXML test suite access problem
>> To: Mailinglist Lilypond
ed message --
From: Menu Jacques
Date: 2017-05-25 23:07 GMT+02:00
Subject: Unofficial MusicXML test suite access problem
To: Mailinglist Lilypond
Cc: Menu Jacques
Hello folks,
— For your information —
The links in that page:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/input/regression/musicxml/collated-files.
Forwarded to bug-list
-- Forwarded message --
From: Menu Jacques
Date: 2017-05-25 23:07 GMT+02:00
Subject: Unofficial MusicXML test suite access problem
To: Mailinglist Lilypond
Cc: Menu Jacques
Hello folks,
— For your information —
The links in that page:
http
Hello Matthew,
On 10/07/16 19:02, Matthew James Briggs wrote:
I have come across a couple of other examples which I believe are incorrect
MusicXML while working with the Lilypond MusicXML test suite. I can
provide additional examples if I come across them and if this information
is useful to
I have come across a couple of other examples which I believe are incorrect
MusicXML while working with the Lilypond MusicXML test suite. I can
provide additional examples if I come across them and if this information
is useful to the Lilypond development community.
I am using MusicXML 3.0
Hi Matthew
Thanks for the report
Il giorno ven 8 lug 2016 alle 7:38, Matthew Briggs
ha scritto:
I have a copy of 01e-Pitches-ParenthesizedAccidentals.xml
which I did not obtain from
your site myself. When I try to check that file now
the link does not work.
The file I have has these constru
I have a copy of 01e-Pitches-ParenthesizedAccidentals.xml
which I did not obtain from
your site myself. When I try to check that file now
the link does not work.
The file I have has these constructs in it:
double-flat
This is illegal MusicXML, the correct value is "flat-flat",
"double-flat" is n
Andreas
On 03/03/16 17:53, Andreas Wenger wrote:
In the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, 24e-GraceNote-StaffChange.xml is
missing the element
2
after
Otherwise, only a single staff is assumed. See
http://www.musicxml.com/UserManuals/MusicXML/Content/EL-MusicXML-staves.htm
In the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, 24e-GraceNote-StaffChange.xml is
missing the element
2
after
Otherwise, only a single staff is assumed. See
http://www.musicxml.com/UserManuals/MusicXML/Content/EL-MusicXML-staves.htm
___
bug-lilypond mailing
> Thanks - although your patch was based on a file location from an
> *installation* of LP not the source (if you see what I mean?).
Oh right - I just debugged the installation. Thats the beauty of script
languages. :-)
> That confused me for a moment. It seemed to let me patch the file in >
the
Tobias,
On 27/02/16 15:19, Tobias Kretschmar wrote:
Hello Werner
Please resend the patch using diff option `-u'.
I have found a switch in WinDiff that sounds like -u option. Please find
attached a new patch. Is it right?
Tobias
___
bug-lilypond m
>> Please resend the patch using diff option `-u'.
>
> I have found a switch in WinDiff that sounds like -u option. Please
> find attached a new patch. Is it right?
Yes, it is, thanks.
Werner
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
htt
Hello Werner
> Please resend the patch using diff option `-u'.
I have found a switch in WinDiff that sounds like -u option. Please find
attached a new patch. Is it right?
Tobias
--- C:/Program Files
(x86)/LilyPond-2.19.36/usr/share/lilypond/current/python/musicxml.orig.py Sun
Jan 31 17:37:00
> I also attached a patch that works for my purposes. At least you can
> confirm the 42a-MultiVoice-TwoVoicesOnStaff-Lyrics test.
Please resend the patch using diff option `-u'.
Werner
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gn
ed a patch that works for my purposes. At least you can
confirm the 42a-MultiVoice-TwoVoicesOnStaff-Lyrics test.
Regards, Tobias
145a146
> self.voice_id = None;
285,287c286,288
< voice_id = self.get_maybe_exist_named_child ('voice')
< if v
placement is correct but there should be a 2 note rest in the
staff (instead of the skip) or the lyric placement is wrong and there
should be a minim (2 beat note) displayed for the second voice?
The title of the test doesn't seem to indicate either way.
We can adjust it but I'll see
Hello James,
>> 42a-MultiVoice-TwoVoicesOnStaff-Lyrics.xml is missing the first note in
>> voice 2? Subsequently the lyrics of voice 2 is moved one note to the
>> right.
>>
> This might be a mistake in the xml file.
Sorry if I could not make me clear. What I meant to say is, that
musicxml2ly skip
James Lowe gnu.org> writes:
> > Is it intended that MusicXML regression test
> > 42a-MultiVoice-TwoVoicesOnStaff-Lyrics.xml is missing the first note in
> > voice 2? Subsequently the lyrics of voice 2 is moved one note to the right.
> This might be a mistake in the xml
Hello Tobias,
On 23/02/16 15:13, Tobias Kretschmar wrote:
I'm not top posting.
Hello
Is it intended that MusicXML regression test
42a-MultiVoice-TwoVoicesOnStaff-Lyrics.xml is missing the first note in
voice 2? Subsequently the lyrics of voice 2 is moved one note to the right.
Re
> I'm not top posting.
Hello
Is it intended that MusicXML regression test
42a-MultiVoice-TwoVoicesOnStaff-Lyrics.xml is missing the first note in
voice 2? Subsequently the lyrics of voice 2 is moved one note to the right.
Regards, Tobias
___
e adjustments to the instructions on the
> Website/in the documentation.
>
> James
>
On Win 8.1, I can double-click on the ly file on my user desktop and get a
pdf. I can't save the test.ly to the public desktop, even when logged in as
administrator (weird), so I can't test
Hello
On 04/02/16 14:16, Masamichi HOSODA wrote:
>>> Sorry, I should be more precise.
>>> It appears that the process of dragging the test file over the LP icon
>>> is
>>> not working for me. Despite the shortcut path being correct. The
>>> install is
>> Sorry, I should be more precise.
>> It appears that the process of dragging the test file over the LP icon
>> is
>> not working for me. Despite the shortcut path being correct. The
>> install is
>> fine.
>>
>>
>
> Which version of Windows
uld notice
"normal" compilation speeds.
HTH,
Abraham
Sorry, I should be more precise.
It appears that the process of dragging the test file over the LP icon is
not working for me. Despite the shortcut path being correct. The install is
fine.
Which version of Windows? This drag-n-dro
ot;normal" compilation speeds.
>
> HTH,
> Abraham
>
Sorry, I should be more precise.
It appears that the process of dragging the test file over the LP icon is
not working for me. Despite the shortcut path being correct. The install is
fine.
___
st
> [hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=186776&i=0>
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
>
> --
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
&g
While I had no problems installing 2.18.2, moving to 2.29.36 was repeatedly
challenging, on Win 7 and 8.1.
The installation itself appears fine, but the test.ly file which is offered
to confirm the install and initiate newcomers has been misleading me.
It fails to generate a pdf. The log file gets
On 05/11/14 09:14, Andreas Wenger wrote:
42a-MultiVoice-TwoVoicesOnStaff-Lyrics.xml:
the very last lyric element should be "Voice2" instead of "Voice1"
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilyp
42a-MultiVoice-TwoVoicesOnStaff-Lyrics.xml:
the very last lyric element should be "Voice2" instead of "Voice1"
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 26/10/14 16:50, Andreas Wenger wrote:
> The test description is wrong: "In this case, one group (with a square
> bracket) goes from staff 2 to 4) and another group (with a curly bracket)
> goes from staff 3 to 5."
> It should be "one group ... goes from staff 1
The test description is wrong: "In this case, one group (with a square
bracket) goes from staff 2 to 4) and another group (with a curly bracket)
goes from staff 3 to 5."
It should be "one group ... goes from staff 1 to 4", since group 1 starts
al
eas Wenger wrote:
>> In 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml from the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, the
>> last note has duration 2 (= undotted 64th), but shows a dotted 128th
>>
>>
>> ___
>> bug-lilypond mailing list
>>
On 24/06/14 21:39, Andreas Wenger wrote:
> In 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml from the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, the
> last note has duration 2 (= undotted 64th), but shows a dotted 128th
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
>
On 24/06/14 21:39, Andreas Wenger wrote:
> In 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml from the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, the
> last note has duration 2 (= undotted 64th), but shows a dotted 128th
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
>
On 24/06/14 21:37, Andreas Wenger wrote:
> 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml from the Unofficial MusicXML test suite contains
> only a single measure in MusicXML, but there should be 41
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3973
James
_
"James" wrote in message
news:53abcbd9.2030...@gmail.com...
Hello devs,
On 24/06/14 22:09, Andreas Wenger wrote:
In the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml contains
only a single measure in MusicXML, but there sh
Hello devs,
On 24/06/14 22:09, Andreas Wenger wrote:
> In the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml contains
> only a single measure in MusicXML, but there should be 41.
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
>
Hi James,
see this page for the Unofficial MusicXML test suite:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/input/regression/musicxml/collated-files
At the very bottom, there is a link to the bug-lilypond mailing list for
reporting bugs, so I used it.
Details to the bug:
In the file 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml
Hm, my attachment obviously got lost on the way…
http://www.musicxml.org/dtds/partwise.dtd";>
Various pitches and interval sizes
All pitch intervals in ascending
jump size.
MusicXML Part
1
0
-Intervals.xml with Finale NotePad.
hth
patrick
On 24.06.2014, at 23:39, James wrote:
> On 24/06/14 22:09, Andreas Wenger wrote:
>> In the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml contains
>> only a single measure in MusicXML, but the
On 24/06/14 22:09, Andreas Wenger wrote:
> In the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml contains
> only a single measure in MusicXML, but there should be 41.
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lil
In the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml contains
only a single measure in MusicXML, but there should be 41.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
In 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml from the Unofficial MusicXML test suite, the
last note has duration 2 (= undotted 64th), but shows a dotted 128th
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hello,
% .../input/regression/grace-end-2.ly
\version "2.19.3"
#(ly:set-option 'warning-as-error #f)
{ e' \acciaccatura << e'8 \\ cis' >> }
--snip--
GNU LilyPond 2.19.3
Processing `grace-end-2.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ideal number o
Hello,
% .../input/regression/grace-end.ly
\version "2.19.3"
#(ly:set-option 'warning-as-error #f)
\context Voice \relative c' {
c4 \grace { d16 d16 }
}
--snip--
GNU LilyPond 2.19.3
Processing `grace-end.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ide
Hello,
% .../input/regression/parenthesize-singlenotes-chords-rests.ly"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
}
\version "2.19.3"
\relative c'' {
% parentheses on single notes (with articulations), inside chord and
articulation
\parenthesize c \parenthesize c-. <\parenthesize c> c-\parenthesize-.
Hello
% ../input/regression/arpeggio-no-staff-symbol.ly
\version "2.19.3"
\new Staff \with { \remove "Staff_symbol_engraver" }
\relative c' {
\arpeggio
}
--snip---
produces:GNU LilyPond 2.19.3
Processing `arpeggio-no-staff-symbol.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical o
Colin Hall writes:
> pls writes:
>> Am 07.02.2013 um 10:46 schrieb Richard Lanyon :
>>
>>> The last note in the file "02a-Rests-Durations.xml" is a dotted 128th note,
>>> but
>>> the file is set up with 32 divisions per quarter notes, which means that a
>>> dotted 128th note is not representable
Many thanks for confirming this - I realise it's only a small thing, but I
just wanted to make sure I understood the intent of the test.
Cheers,
Richard
From: pls
To: Richard Lanyon ,
Cc: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Date: 08/02/2013 11:22
Subject:Re: possible bug in Mus
pls writes:
> Am 07.02.2013 um 10:46 schrieb Richard Lanyon :
>
>> The last note in the file "02a-Rests-Durations.xml" is a dotted 128th note,
>> but
>> the file is set up with 32 divisions per quarter notes, which means that a
>> dotted 128th note is not representable (it would be 1.5 divisions
Richard,
you are right it should be 64 divisions but for some reason the result is
correct. So it's not the worst musicxml2ly bug!
Cheers
patrick
Am 07.02.2013 um 10:46 schrieb Richard Lanyon :
> The last note in the file "02a-Rests-Durations.xml" is a dotted 128th note,
> but
> the file is se
The last note in the file "02a-Rests-Durations.xml" is a dotted 128th note, but
the file is set up with 32 divisions per quarter notes, which means that a
dotted 128th note is not representable (it would be 1.5 divisions long). Is this
intentional? I understand that the notated duration does not ne
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:00:32AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 07:42:48PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> > dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ ../lilypond-extra/patches/test-patches.py
>
> This seems to be a bug report against code from the lily
John Mandereau writes:
> Il giorno lun, 18/06/2012 alle 19.42 +0200, David Kastrup ha scritto:
>> dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ ../lilypond-extra/patches/test-patches.py
>> Error: non-existent directory or directory not containing a valid Git
>> repository: No sectio
Il giorno lun, 18/06/2012 alle 19.42 +0200, David Kastrup ha scritto:
> dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ ../lilypond-extra/patches/test-patches.py
> Error: non-existent directory or directory not containing a valid Git
> repository: No section: 'source'
> Please set
dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ ../lilypond-extra/patches/test-patches.py
Error: non-existent directory or directory not containing a valid Git
repository: No section: 'source'
Please set git_repository_dir in [source] section of the configuration file
or environment variable LI
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-countdown Fixed_2_15_35
Comment #4 on issue 2426 by d...@gnu.org: test-baseline does not include
fonts
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2426
Pushed as 37e77427af1a69887e2ebafd1c51a79fadff5c2a to staging
Updates:
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #2 on issue 2426 by d...@gnu.org: test-baseline does not include
fonts
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2426#c2
Patchy the autobot says: LGTM.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #1 on issue 2426 by d...@gnu.org: test-baseline does not include
fonts
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2426#c1
Issue 2426: override hardwired fonts in test-baseline
This is not the same as embedding the fonts used at baseline
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Scripts
New issue 2426 by d...@gnu.org: test-baseline does not include fonts
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2426
Using an archive of premade test-baselines, I just encountered the
following error with "make check":
input/
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_15_34
Comment #3 on issue 2258 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Bad regression
test 'beam-shortened-lengths.ly'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2258
Test repaired in commit dc1fe7750079c4c7c4042bd570884e
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new
Comment #3 on issue 2016 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Patch: Test commit --
add .sh file for testing
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2016
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #17 on issue 1 by janek.li...@gmail.com: this is a test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1#c17
mooo! test
http://codereview.appspot.com/5564068
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 2258 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Bad regression
test 'beam-shortened-lengths.ly'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2258
The regression test went bad between 2.14.2 and 2.15.14
No no. I was again confused by the change to the test itself.
This
Comment #2 on issue 2257 by m...@apollinemike.com: reg-test
beam-shortened-lengths.ly fails
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2257
Hmm...I'll have a look - pester me if I forget!
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gn
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Maintainability
New issue 2258 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Bad regression
test 'beam-shortened-lengths.ly'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2258
LilyPond usually shortens stems as the test criterion describes,
\header{ texi
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Critical Regression
New issue 2257 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: reg-test beam-shortened-lengths.ly
fails
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2257
\header{
texidoc="Beams in unnatural direction, have shortened stems, but do not
loo
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #7 on issue 1968 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: test full GUB rebuild
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1968
Marking as verified as I can build 2.14.2 and 2.15.25 with GUB, at least on
Ubuntu 10.04
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #6 on issue 2020 by philehol...@gmail.com: Patch: avoid cryptic
StopIteration failure from make when 'make check' is run before 'make
test-baseline'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #6 on issue 2036 by colingh...@gmail.com: make test in flower
subdirectory produces lots of warnings with g++ 4.6
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2036
I have verified this commit is in the repo
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Owner: d...@gnu.org
Mergedinto: 1997
Comment #5 on issue 1809 by d...@gnu.org: make test segfaults
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1809
Actually I fixed this already. Marking it as a duplicate of the fixed
issue
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-High
Comment #4 on issue 1809 by pkx1...@gmail.com: make test segfaults
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1809
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-countdown Fixed_2_15_21
Comment #5 on issue 2036 by d...@gnu.org: make test in flower subdirectory
produces lots of warnings with g++ 4.6
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2036
Does not really need the red tape I guess
Updates:
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #2 on issue 2036 by lilypond...@gmail.com: make test in flower
subdirectory produces lots of warnings with g++ 4.6
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2036#c2
Patchy the autobot says: LGTM
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #1 on issue 2036 by d...@gnu.org: make test in flower subdirectory
produces lots of warnings with g++ 4.6
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2036#c1
Issue 2036: keep make test in flower from warnings
http://codereview.appspot.com
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-push fixed_2_15_20
Comment #5 on issue 2020 by adam.spi...@gmail.com: Patch: avoid cryptic
StopIteration failure from make when 'make check' is run before 'make
test-baseline'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/i
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Warning
New issue 2036 by d...@gnu.org: make test in flower subdirectory produces
lots of warnings with g++ 4.6
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2036
See attached log file.
Attachments:
flower-test.log 7.3 KB
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #4 on issue 2020 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Patch: avoid cryptic
StopIteration failure from make when 'make check' is run before 'make
test-baseline'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2020
Coun
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: adam.spi...@gmail.com
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Comment #2 on issue 2020 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Patch: avoid cryptic
StopIteration failure from make when 'make check' is run before 'make
test-baseline'
http
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #1 on issue 2020 by adam.spi...@gmail.com: Patch: avoid cryptic
StopIteration failure from make when 'make check' is run before 'make
test-baseline'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2020#c1
avoid cryptic S
Issue 1968: test full GUB rebuild
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1968
This issue is no longer blocking issue 1933.
See http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1933
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Maintainability
New issue 2020 by adam.spi...@gmail.com: Patch: avoid cryptic StopIteration
failure from make when 'make check' is run before 'make test-baseline'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2020
Avoid cryptic S
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #2 on issue 2016 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Patch: Test commit --
add .sh file for testing
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2016
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 2016 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Patch: Test commit --
add .sh file for testing
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2016
Oops -- I added this by mistake. I'm testing a change in git-cl.
I'll delete it when I'm done.
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
New issue 2016 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Patch: Test commit -- add .sh file
for testing
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2016
Test commit -- add .sh file for testing
Remove try and except due to syntax error
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_15_15
Comment #5 on issue 1968 by percival.music...@gmail.com: test full GUB
rebuild
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1968
rebuild went ok with gub 634fd7f67f0c04d0a3e8dfb2e9dd945a08ae3a4b ; or at
least, it was able
Updates:
Summary: test full GUB rebuild
Comment #4 on issue 1968 by percival.music...@gmail.com: test full GUB
rebuild
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1968
the guile thing is fixed by downgrading perl to 5.10.0, but it would be
good to test if there's any
Comment #2 on issue 1899 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: test issue from python
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1899
How about the reverse link, Graham? I can't find a matching issue on
Rietveld, at least not one owned by percival.music.ca. With the
complementary link,
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 1899 by percival.music.ca: test issue from python
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1899
bingo.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Other
New issue 1899 by percival.music.ca: test issue from python
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1899
if this works, it means that we can easily link rietveld to our current bug
tracker
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Critical Priority-High
Comment #3 on issue 1809 by percival.music.ca: make test segfaults
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1809
Given the occasional nature and difficulty in reproducing (even for you, on
your own computer), I'm downgr
Comment #2 on issue 1809 by reinhold...@gmail.com: make test segfaults
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1809
Have you tried running lilypond through valgrind? You'll have to ignore all
warnings from the garbage collection, but maybe some uninitialized value or
a d
Comment #15 on issue 1 by lemniska...@gmail.com: this is a test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1
Let's try a reply to reply...
I see the footer 'reply to this mail' and the reply address is
lilyp...@googlecode.com.
Comment #14 on issue 1 by philehol...@googlemail.com: this is a test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1
Test: Looks like some emailed replies are tracked, but not all. Adding
this to make a consistent check.
___
bug-lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 1809 by d...@gnu.org: make test segfaults
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1809
This is a somewhat frustrating state of things. I reconfigured with
./configure CXXFLAGS="-fkeep-inline-functions -fno-jump-threading"
in order to get a more useful
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical
New issue 1809 by percival.music.ca: make test segfaults
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1809
David is experiencing occasional segfaults when merely compiling the
regression tests. Technical info here
Comment #13 on issue 1 by lemniska...@gmail.com: this is a test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1
Final test: see if this appears on the tracker's webpage.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
