On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:19:11PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On 22 mai 2012, at 19:17, JD Duncan wrote:
>
> > The following snippet shows a measure where the TupletNumber has
> > good placement in 2.14.2 but strange placement in 2.15.38.
> >
> > JD
> >
>
> Dear JD,
>
> In LilyPond
John David Duncan gmail.com> writes:
> > In LilyPond 2.15.38, TupletNumber placement automatically follows
> > the voice, not the stem direction. You've inverted the traditional
> > stem direction of voices (usually the top voice points up), and the
> > TupletNumber does not automatically
Dear JD,
In LilyPond 2.15.38, TupletNumber placement automatically follows
the voice, not the stem direction. You've inverted the traditional
stem direction of voices (usually the top voice points up), and the
TupletNumber does not automatically follow this. To change this,
you can a
ff.connectArpeggios = ##t
>
> \new Staff = "RH" \with { \consists "Page_turn_engraver" } \pianoRH
> \new Dynamics \dynamics
> \new Staff = "LH" \pianoLH
> >>
>
> \layout { }
> }
>
>
it is
On 22 mai 2012, at 19:17, JD Duncan wrote:
>> I'm not top posting.
>
> The following snippet shows a measure where the TupletNumber has good
> placement
> in 2.14.2 but strange placement in 2.15.38.
>
> JD
>
>
> \language english
>
> Score begins here
> \parallelMusic #'(pianoRH dyna
> I'm not top posting.
The following snippet shows a measure where the TupletNumber has good placement
in 2.14.2 but strange placement in 2.15.38.
JD
\language english
Score begins here
\parallelMusic #'(pianoRH dynamics pianoLH) {
% Measure 9
<< { \stemDown df''2\arpeggio s2 } \\
