John David Duncan-3 wrote:
>
>> I'm not top posting.
>
> The following snippet shows a measure where the TupletNumber has good
> placement
> in 2.14.2 but strange placement in 2.15.38.
>
> JD
>
>
> \language english
>
> %%%% Score begins here
> \parallelMusic #'(pianoRH dynamics pianoLH) {
>
> % Measure 9
> << { \stemDown df''2\arpeggio s2 } \\
> { \stemUp \times 2/3 { g''8[ af'' c'''] } df'''8 f'''
> \ottava #+1
> \times 2/3 { <g'' g'''>8 \( <af'' af'''> <g'' g'''> \) }
> \times 2/3 { <f'' f'''> \( <df'' df'''> <f'' f'''> \) }
> \ottava #0 } >> |
> s1\f |
> \clef bass <df af f'>2\arpeggio \clef treble <af' f''>2 |
>
>
> % End of Music
> }
>
> \score {
> \new PianoStaff
> <<
> \set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
>
> \new Staff = "RH" \with { \consists "Page_turn_engraver" } \pianoRH
> \new Dynamics \dynamics
> \new Staff = "LH" \pianoLH
> >>
>
> \layout { }
> }
>
>
it is recommended to use \voiceOne, \voiceTwo … because \stemUp or \stemDown
only affect the direction of the stems (and no other properties)
hth
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/TupletNumber-regression-tp33890750p33892761.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
