> I'm not top posting.
The following snippet shows a measure where the TupletNumber has good placement
in 2.14.2 but strange placement in 2.15.38.
JD
\language english
%%%% Score begins here
\parallelMusic #'(pianoRH dynamics pianoLH) {
% Measure 9
<< { \stemDown df''2\arpeggio s2 } \\
{ \stemUp \times 2/3 { g''8[ af'' c'''] } df'''8 f'''
\ottava #+1
\times 2/3 { <g'' g'''>8 \( <af'' af'''> <g'' g'''> \) }
\times 2/3 { <f'' f'''> \( <df'' df'''> <f'' f'''> \) }
\ottava #0 } >> |
s1\f |
\clef bass <df af f'>2\arpeggio \clef treble <af' f''>2 |
% End of Music
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff
<<
\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\new Staff = "RH" \with { \consists "Page_turn_engraver" } \pianoRH
\new Dynamics \dynamics
\new Staff = "LH" \pianoLH
>>
\layout { }
}
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
