Comment #8 on issue 1817 by d...@gnu.org: Bug in autobeaming 3/4
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817
Adding yet another view on Comment 5:
Bertrand quotes Gerou that we should have r4 r8 a a a beamed as r4 r8 a [a
a] in 3/4 timing, and I consider this correct. The crazy th
There should never be three quavers beamed together in 3/4 time.
There's nothing wrong with three quavers following a dotted
crotchet, though I agree that the reverse is incorrect.
If you remember, we deliberately retained the current behaviour
for 3/4 after I argued that it's common in
Comment #7 on issue 1817 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Bug in autobeaming 3/4
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817
There should never be three quavers beamed together in 3/4 time.
There's nothing wrong with three quavers following a dotted crotchet,
though I agree that the reve
Comment #6 on issue 1817 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Bug in autobeaming 3/4
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817
I agree with comment 5. This is unquestionably wrong. There should never
be three quavers beamed together in 3/4 time.
Other references allow beaming 4 quavers
Comment #5 on issue 1817 by bordage@gmail.com: Bug in autobeaming 3/4
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817
Even if we consider Carl's solution is good, there is still some
problematic cases.
Just one example: r4 r8 a a a
Gerou's essential dictionary of music notation sa
Comment #4 on issue 1817 by d...@gnu.org: Bug in autobeaming 3/4
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817
I can't agree with Carl's comment since it would rule out using 4.
altogether in 3/4 rhythm, and rule out using something like 4.. pretty much
altogether. Which I conside
Comment #3 on issue 1817 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Bug in autobeaming 3/4
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817
The first measure should actually probably be notated as
a4~a8 b c d
If it's notated this way, the beaming works correctly.
Similarly, the second measure should pr
Updates:
Summary: Bug in autobeaming 3/4
Comment #2 on issue 1817 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Bug in autobeaming
3/4
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817
Correct title.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.o
