> Same here:
>
> 1 Page with 9 systems and lyrics.
> PDF=4MB
> SP=400KB
Two reasons:
1. Insert this at the top of your document
#(ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f)
2. Apply the patch below to gs 8.53 (and older versions too, IIRC)
and recompile.
Werner
=
working with lilypond version 2.8.0 under windows XP Home Edition I made the
following experience:
- before you start midi2ly.py you must change to the directory in which the
file
to be converted is stored; also, the output option does not work
- also midi2ly.py: blanks in the name of the file
Graham Percival schreef:
I don't mind documenting this as a bug in section 10.4.2, but I'd like
to get some comments from the other dev team members -- is this a bug
that will be fixed soon, a bug that won't get fixed soon, or deliberate
design?
I hope that I'll be able to insert some a sane
Am Montag, 27. März 2006 12:29 schrieb Christian Schramm:
> After upgrading from 2.6.5 to 2.8 and recompiling my sheets, the new pdfs
> were up to 100 times larger than the previous ones. For example, a test.ly
> that looks like
> \layout { ragged-right = ##t }
> { c'4 e' g' }
> produces a pdf 198k
Mats,
Windows 98 SE and it is 2.8.0-5
I hope this gets to the list.
Robin
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Could you please send information on which Windows version you use and
the exact version number of the LilyPond package
(if you downloaded it today, it was 2.8.0-5). Send the information to
Could you please send information on which Windows version you use and
the exact version number of the LilyPond package
(if you downloaded it today, it was 2.8.0-5). Send the information to
the mailing list.
/Mats
Quoting Robin Oye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Greetings,
When I attempt to start Li
I agree. For me the real *bug* is that #'dash-fraction = #0.97 makes all
noteheads, clefs and markups disappear in the following score output. And
it took me a while to find the culprit
Arno
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:08:38 +0100, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
From: "Arno Waschk"
On 24-Mar-06, at 3:28 AM, dave k wrote:
On
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.8/Documentation/user/lilypond/Jazz-
combo.html
The score looks messed up.
If I remember correctly, nobody's worked on this score since about lily
2.0 days. If you'd like to clean it up and submit an improved version,
%
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\version "2.7.40"
\header { texidoc = "
\hcenter-in gives unpredictable results if used with PianoStaff.
" }
\paper {
indent = 50.0\mm
line-width = 80.0\mm
}
\score { <<
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff {
\set Staff.instrument = \markup { \hcenter-in #15 "Foo
Hi,
After fetching the recent contents of the LilyPond CVS, I try to compile the
code on my Linux box (OpenSUSE 10.0, gcc 4.0.2, updated fontforge).
(0) Download the CVS contents to $HOME/lilypond
(1) ~> cd ~/lilypond
(2) ~/lilypond> ./autogen.sh --prefix=/home/andreas/Work/WEB
(3) ~/lilypond> ni
> > Possibly something is incorrect with the pictures.
>
> Hmm. Could you give us the exact error messages?
>
> To the devel team, this is the page with the Henle and Barenreiter flat
> signs. I have no idea what's wrong with those images; I leave this to
> other people who know more as pdf / eps
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
However, when I run LilyPond --verbose ... , it still spends quite some
time
at
..
Initializing FontConfig...
Rebuilding FontConfig cache C:\Documents and
Settings\mats/.fonts.cache-1. this
may take a while...
adding font directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/li
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I just tried it and it seems that fc-cache.exe doesn't seem to do
anything when
I call it will full path. The command prompt returns directly and no
file is produced. Since the lilypond binaries are in %PATH%, I als
Over here, it normally ret
> > While processing `xiao-haizi-guai-guai.ly' I get this error:
>
> Upgrade guile. Alternatively, use the GUB build.
This works. But the resulting PS file can be neither displayed nor
processed further with ghostscript which doesn't have the CJK
extensions installed.
My gs 7.07 installation c
I use Windows XP and I use the newest version 3.80. and I see that in
the templates for the chords with lyrics and the following, 3.1.3 and 3.1.4
isn't there supposed to be the words of the lyric in the lyric box? Instead I
get the LilyPond creator information, version and date.
To see if t
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
[CVS 2006-03-17]
[To make the logging data easier to read I've replaced the
`/usr/local/share/lilypond/2.7.39' prefix with <>.]
While processing `xiao-haizi-guai-guai.ly' I get this error:
Layout output to `xiao-haizi-guai-guai.ps'...
<>/scm/framework-ps.scm:339:9:
Graham Percival wrote:
I've just installed the GNU/Linux GUB. It works on a few simpler files,
but when given a more complex file it doesn't work.
...
programming error: minimise_least_squares (): Nothing to minimise
I see the same thing, occurring with
input/typography-demo.ly
This halts "
Graham Percival wrote:
Problem still exists in 2.7.39
Some score examples have important notation that gets cut off (due to
margins, .eps boundary boxes, or whatever). The worst doc sections are
8.2.5 Instrument names
(instrument names get cut off in the middle of a letter)
10.4.2 Page
Han-Wen Nienhuys kirjoitti:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> The code below produces a whole bunch of errors of this kind:
>> programming error: Inf or NaN encountered
>> continuing, cross fingers
>> programming error: Insane offset
>> continuing, cross fingers
>>
>> That's not so serious, but there's
> I just upgraded to Fedora 5, and now I get CJK problems too. What
> do you suggest as a solution? A font is accessed as CIDFont if the
> font doesn't support glyphnames.
Two issues.
. If we include a TrueType font as Type 42, it must contain a
/CharStrings dictionary which assigns glyph
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
I've also added cache files for the lilypond fonts. I don't see any
difference.
Me neither!
Note that nobody ever claimed that LilyPond was fast.
Right, still it's annoying that it stalls some 10 s (on my machine)
extra in Windows compared
> A new release critical bug (not in 2.6): after breathing sign, bar
> numbering is left displaced.
> {
> R1 \breathe \break
> R1 % bar number is left displaced
> R1 % bar number Ok
> }
Sorry, I missed a \break in the second line.
___
bug-lilyp
> I would think that restoring the default to middle C would be
> reasonable.
AFAIK, there's nothing to `restore' since it hasn't been changed.
Graham only documented the current behaviour.
Werner
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.or
Hi, Your program seems very nice . But doing some tests I stopped in front of
this example
{ c’4 e’ g’}
I processed this file and the program returns me this message
Whath is wrong in my test?
Thank you in advance for answer
Gianni
# -*-compilation-*-
Changing working directory to `D:/lilypond
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
In light of this suprising you and the idea that relative means
relative to something I might suggest that there be no default and
that not specifying a starting point be an error.
Yep.
This is what it used to be, and it annoyed us that we had to type " c' "
all the tim
Hello Mats,
you are right, it works.
Thank you very much.
Bye!
Torsten
>This should definitely not be necessary. I have used lilypond-book together
>with MikTeX in Windows and I don't have any font problems (there are Python
>problems, though). I hope you have followed the instructions on how
Greetings,
When I attempt to start Lilypond, I still get a dos window saying:
GNU Lilypond 2.8.0
Rebuilding FontConfig cache c:\Windows\TEMP\.fonts.cache-1. This may take a
while..._
The window runs for a while, and then an illegal operation error message with
these details appears.
LILYPOND-W
This should definitely not be necessary. I have used lilypond-book
together with MikTeX in Windows and I don't have any font problems
(there are Python problems, though). I hope you have followed the
instructions on how to use the --psfonts
flag and the corresponding flag for dvips.
/Mats
Qu
After upgrading from 2.6.5 to 2.8 and recompiling my sheets, the new pdfs were
up to 100 times larger than the previous ones. For example, a test.ly that looks
like
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
{ c'4 e' g' }
produces a pdf 198kb in size, whereas the ps file is only 13 kb large (and ps
files tende
Hi,
I just wanted to report that "make all web" (either in one command or as "make
all; make web") fails on OpenSUSE 10.0 (with gcc 4.0.2) for both the source
drop of LilyPond 2.8.0 and the CVS contents of LilyPond 2.9.0. In both cases,
"make web" aborts with these final words (slightly edited for
30 matches
Mail list logo
