Mats Bengtsson wrote:
However, when I run LilyPond --verbose ... , it still spends quite some
time
at
..
Initializing FontConfig...
Rebuilding FontConfig cache C:\Documents and
Settings\mats/.fonts.cache-1. this
may take a while...
adding font directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond//current/fonts/otf/
adding font directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond//current/fonts/type1/Building font
database.
..
and the file C:\Documents and Settings\mats/.fonts.cache-1
is still empty, but that's maybe normal? It seems that the time spent
on producing the cache file in C:\WINDOWS\Fonts\ was negligible,
I cannot notice any difference in the time it takes to run LilyPond.
I've also added cache files for the lilypond fonts. I don't see any
difference, but Dave might want to try 2.8.0-3.
Note that nobody ever claimed that LilyPond was fast.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
