Re: Using the cross built toolchain

2007-12-10 Thread Praveen A
2007/12/10, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello! > > Thank you, I'll get back to you as soon as I need help. (I have nearly > no idea about how to write rules for building .dpkg packages.) > Just take one existing rules file and play around, it is just an executable make file #!/usr/bi

Re: cross-gnu

2007-12-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 02:55:56PM +0100, I wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:08:18AM +0100, I wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:17:05PM +0100, I wrote: > > > During the next days I'll try to come up with a repository containing the > > > needed patches so that recent versions of GCC

Re: [PATCH] Fix parallel build failure

2007-12-10 Thread Ivan Shmakov
> Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guillem, Samuel, thanks for your investiagation, but I had not yet > installed this patch for a reason. It should not be needed at all, > as well as also the already-existing ``i386/i386at/boothdr.o: > i386/i386/i386asm.h'' dependency line s

Re: Using the cross built toolchain

2007-12-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:20:34PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > - On Dec 5, 2007 4:57 AM, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Is explicitly setting `LDFLAGS' really needed? > \-- > > Or we can add -L/usr/local/hurd/sys_root/lib to LD_LIB_PATH? Without > setting it, it fail

Re: Using the cross built toolchain

2007-12-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 06:29:00PM -0700, Michael Heath wrote: > On Dec 4, 2007 4:27 PM, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Or even as `dpkg' (for GNU/Linux) packages, if someone > > teaches me the needed Debian magic. > > > > > I'd be willing to maintain the Debian/dpkg package

Re: [PATCH] Fix parallel build failure

2007-12-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 02:00:15PM +0100, I wrote: > Guillem, Samuel, thanks for your investiagation, but I had not yet > installed this patch for a reason. It should not be needed at all, as > well as also the already-existing ``i386/i386at/boothdr.o: > i386/i386/i386asm.h'' dependency li

Re: [PATCH] Fix parallel build failure

2007-12-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! Guillem, Samuel, thanks for your investiagation, but I had not yet installed this patch for a reason. It should not be needed at all, as well as also the already-existing ``i386/i386at/boothdr.o: i386/i386/i386asm.h'' dependency line should not be needed. On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 07:23:08