Hello! On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 02:55:56PM +0100, I wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:08:18AM +0100, I wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:17:05PM +0100, I wrote: > > > During the next days I'll try to come up with a repository containing the > > > needed patches so that recent versions of GCC and glibc can be used. > > > > Finally. Turns out that patching is only needed if using GCC 4.2. So > > we'll simply use GCC 4.1 for now. > > If you want to test building with GCC 4.2 you'll need the patch provided > on <http://www.schwinge.homeip.net/~thomas/tmp/gcc-patches/>.
I posted a patch that allows for building with GCC trunk (upcoming 4.3) on <http://www.schwinge.homeip.net/~thomas/tmp/gcc-patches/>. As for the GCC 4.2 patch, it won't be accepted by upstream as-is. If you want something reliable that is known to work, then stick with GCC 4.2 or 4.1. Building the cross glibc and stuff with GCC 4.3 worked, but I did not yet test the result. Building with GCC 4.3 also does need a glibc patch, <http://www.schwinge.homeip.net/~thomas/tmp/glibc-patches/0024-2007-03-18-Joseph-Myers-joseph-codesourcery.com.patch>, same as has been posted on <http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5442>. Roland? > I'll update the wiki page accordingly. Again. Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
