Thomas Bushnell BSG, le Thu 09 Nov 2006 17:05:37 -0800, a écrit :
> Why the change to add parentheses to printf.c:_doprnt? (If this is to
> shut up a gcc warning, then it seems ok, I guess.)
Yes, that's it, but I dropped it for now for patch coherency.
Samuel
__
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Bushnell BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Barry deFreese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: Gnumach Cleanup Round 3 - Move printf.h and add
panicdeclaration
Why the change to add parentheses to printf.c:_dopr
Why the change to add parentheses to printf.c:_doprnt? (If this is to
shut up a gcc warning, then it seems ok, I guess.)
We do not normally put comments on #include's saying why the file was
included for a couple reasons: it very quickly gets out of date, and it
doesn't really communicate anythin
On Nov 10, 2006, at 12:36 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hello.
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 02:06:45PM -0300, Leonardo Pereira wrote:
"I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it." - Voltaire
[...]
So, Leonardo, with forwarding his email, you es
Update of task #5726 (project hurd):
To be done before: It's done for memcpy/memset/str*/*printf*, should
check whether there are still other functions => Have implementation which
should just be advertised: putchar(), puts()
Have odd implementation: exit()
Have implementation somewhere, s
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 14:06 -0300, Leonardo Pereira wrote:
> "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
> death, your right to say it." - Voltaire
"Moron, I told you wahat todo you fuck nutt."
"PLEASE GET A FUCKING CLUE YOU FUCKING IDIOT!"
"Then suck the cock of a cow."
Hello.
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 02:06:45PM -0300, Leonardo Pereira wrote:
> "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
> death, your right to say it." - Voltaire
So. Nice quote. But. Szmidt always has the right to say what he wants
to say. (Even if he keeps telling p
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Bushnell BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: Working on stuff / statement from tschwinge (was:
Gnumachclean: Need advice, re Header files)
I think Roland's e
> As for the technical issue, Roland is mostly but not entirely right
> about what gnumach/include is for.
>
> It has both the interface files, and pseudo-clones of C library headers,
> which don't get installed because the C library has better versions. In
> that category are , , ,
> , , ,
> ,
I think Roland's email was a little over-hasty, to be sure. Let's just
not fret about one message that was over-hasty and import too much to
it, ok?
As for the technical issue, Roland is mostly but not entirely right
about what gnumach/include is for.
It has both the interface files, and pseudo-
"I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it." - Voltaire
From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: bug-hurd@gnu.org
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], bug-hurd@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (message from Thomas Schwing
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Schwinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:50 AM
Subject: Working on stuff / statement from tschwinge (was: Gnumach
clean:Need advice, re Header files)
Thomas,
Thanks for writi
[Cced to hurd-devel.]
Hello!
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:46:36PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I haven't looked at the changes myself. If any files have been added to
> include/, it sounds like there is some inadequate review going on before
> commits. Folks, don't go hog-wild when you don't r
Roland McGrath, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 20:07:32 -0800, a écrit :
> include/ is for installed headers. None of those should be added.
There has been alloca.h there from Thomas since 1997.
Samuel
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.
14 matches
Mail list logo
