Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor git-svn bridge is available

2014-05-12 Thread Moritz Gerstung
Hi all Following Kasper's idea from a couple of months ago: Would it be possible to have the git-svn bridge synchronise a branch other than master? If so, one could use the git subtree command, git subtree split -P minfi -b biocsvn to create a branch 'biocsvn' only containing minfi directory

Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor git-svn bridge is available

2014-05-12 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
Hi Moritz, - Original Message - > From: "Moritz Gerstung" > To: "Kasper Daniel Hansen" > Cc: "Dan Tenenbaum" , bioc-devel@r-project.org, "Sean > Davis" > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 1:32:38 AM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor git-svn bridge is available > > Hi all > > Followin

Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor git-svn bridge is available

2014-05-12 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Moritz Gerstung wrote: > Hi all > > Following Kasper's idea from a couple of months ago: Would it be possible to > have the git-svn bridge synchronise a branch other than master? > > If so, one could use the git subtree command, > > git subtree split -P minfi -b b

Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor git-svn bridge is available

2014-05-12 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Henrik Bengtsson" > To: "Moritz Gerstung" > Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org, "Sean Davis" > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 10:19:15 AM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor git-svn bridge is available > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Moritz Gerstung > wr

Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor git-svn bridge is available

2014-05-12 Thread Hector Corrada Bravo
Another use case where this is useful is that newer packages may still need to use the 'devel' BioC branch as something of a 'release' branch since a natural release cycle is faster than the BioC cycle (I think of the BioC devel branch that way for some packages). This way the master branch on git

Re: [Bioc-devel] export() to 2bit file

2014-05-12 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Michael, On 05/09/2014 04:39 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: What would be the fastest way to do this with a DNAString? Just an alphabetFrequency? That would do it. A couple of other issues I ran into with the 2bit code: (1) It fails on empty sequences: > export(DNAStringSet(c("AA", "",

Re: [Bioc-devel] export() to 2bit file

2014-05-12 Thread Michael Lawrence
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > On 05/09/2014 04:39 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: > >> What would be the fastest way to do this with a DNAString? Just an >> alphabetFrequency? >> > > That would do it. > > A couple of other issues I ran into with the 2bit

Re: [Bioc-devel] export() to 2bit file

2014-05-12 Thread Hervé Pagès
On 05/12/2014 12:23 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Hervé Pagès mailto:hpa...@fhcrc.org>> wrote: Hi Michael, On 05/09/2014 04:39 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: What would be the fastest way to do this with a DNAString? Just an alphabetFre

Re: [Bioc-devel] libRblas and libRlapack are broken dependencies for packages in R 3.1.0 on Fedora 20

2014-05-12 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
E N hotmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > Let's me quote Ed Borasky I'm also active on the Fedora Bugzilla for this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074975 Here's a bit more detail. I don't know the exact process, but when a package is updated, like R 3.0.2 to 3.1.0, a Fedora p

[Bioc-devel] Slow performance on scanBam

2014-05-12 Thread James Bullard
I've been dealing with some small bam files with millions of reference sequences leading to monster headers. As one might guess, this leads to pretty bad performance when calling scanBam. Right now, it takes a bit (27MB bam file, 16k alignments, 2.5 million reference sequences in the reference fas

Re: [Bioc-devel] libRblas and libRlapack are broken dependencies for packages in R 3.1.0 on Fedora 20

2014-05-12 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
1. It looks like R 3.1.0 is back in the Fedora updates-testing repository. I just installed it and re-ran my install scripts. 2. A fair number of library packages appear to have been built around the libRblas or libRlapack library. The ones I have had to re-install so far are: 'robustbase',

[Bioc-devel] R CMD CHECK options

2014-05-12 Thread Siddhartha Bagaria
Hello! This is my first time posting to the community. I am working on a new Bioconductor package for the Google Genomics API. I tried to search but could not find the options and environment variables I should use for R CMD CHECK before submission to Bioconductor. I have dependencies on packages

Re: [Bioc-devel] R CMD CHECK options

2014-05-12 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
Hi Siddartha, - Original Message - > From: "Siddhartha Bagaria" > To: bioc-devel@r-project.org > Cc: "Craig Citro" > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 9:00:04 PM > Subject: [Bioc-devel] R CMD CHECK options > > Hello! > > This is my first time posting to the community. I am working on a new >