In article ,
Alexander Gurvitz wrote:
> You should NOT get A records. Wildcard works only for hostnames
> that have NO records of ANY type.
Excuse me while I delirk, but this is interesting. Is a name on the RHS
of an RR regarded as existing enough to prevent wildcard lookup? In
this I woul
In article ,
Tony Finch wrote:
> Sam Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Is a name on the RHS of an RR regarded as existing enough to prevent
> > wildcard lookup?
>
> No, only RR owner names.
>
> > In this I would have expected the NS lookup to be followed by an A
&g
In article ,
Tony Finch wrote:
> It looks to me like this is an EDNS bug. ...
There's some kind of delegation bug as well. If I query
dns1[0-3].one.microsoft.com for SOA and NS for
partners.extranet.microsoft.com you get sensible answers though the
origin host is different for each server q
In article ,
Gabriele Paggi wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> > There's some kind of delegation bug as well. If I query
> > dns1[0-3].one.microsoft.com for SOA and NS for
> > partners.extranet.microsoft.com you get sensible answers though the
> > origin host is different for each server queried and thos
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Sam Wilson wrote:
>
> > For a NXDOMAIN response, or NOERROR with an empty answer section, the
> > server should provide the SOA record in the authority section. That SOA
> > is the apex of the zone which doesn&
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <5091adef.1040...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
> > On 10/31/2012 03:56 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > You are equating a practice that was techically wrong, and known
> > > to be wrong from the get go, with one that has never been techically
>
In article ,
Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
> > YPYMAYTYP
>
> Zero results from my favorite search engine -- congratulations. ;-)
Thank you. Try YPYMAYTYC but I was thinking pick.
Sam
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
In article ,
Chris Thompson wrote:
> On Apr 5 2013, John Wobus wrote:
>
> >> DNAME?
> >
> >Or SRV records. Surely browsers are adding support
> >in the next day or two?
>
> Come on, April 1 has been over for too long for this.
>
> Incidentally, we have just been asked for an A record for ca
In article ,
wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> > >Incidentally, we have just been asked for an A record for cam.ac.uk to
> > >duplicate www.cam.ac.uk because, and I quote, "all the publicity
> material
> > >sent out by the nominator [for an award for the web site] gave the URL
> > >as http://cam.ac.uk/ an
In article ,
Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2013-04-05 12:18, Sam Wilson wrote:
> > We're currently prevaricating over putting in an A record for ed.ac.uk.
> > Whilst my colleagues who manage active directory assure me that having
> > an A record there - pointing at the conte
In article ,
Phil Mayers wrote:
> Sam Wilson wrote:
>
> > [adding an A record for ed.ac.uk.]
> >
>
> If your AD realm is also called ed.ac.uk then adding an A record will
> definitely affect things.
Which is exactly the opposite of what our AD guys sai
In article ,
Doug Barton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 04/05/2013 11:53 PM, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
>
> | It is funny you should mention that... my questions about using views
> | to create a situation where one single record is different happens to
> | be
In article ,
wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> Warren Kumari wrote on 04/05/2013 06:48:08 PM:
>
> > > And then there's theses folks:
> > >
> > > http://no-www.org/
> > >
> >
> > Oh wow!
> >
> > Gee, thanks for that?
>
> And it's always fun when you tell someone to go to a URL that doesn't
> includ
In article ,
Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 08/04/13 14:46, Sam Wilson wrote:
> > In article ,
> > Phil Mayers wrote:
> >
> >> Sam Wilson wrote:
> >>
> >>> [adding an A record for ed.ac.uk.]
> >>>
> >>
> >> If y
In article ,
"Barry S. Finkel" wrote:
> On 4/8/2013 9:10 AM, bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org wrote:
> > In article , Phil
> > Mayers wrote:
> >> >Sam Wilson wrote:
> >> >
> >>> > >[adding an A record for ed.ac.uk.]
> >
In article ,
Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 06:59 PM, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
>
> > Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they'd be right if
> > and only if the webserver they're adding the A record for happens to
> > also be the AD server.
>
> In principle that's correct.
>
>
In article ,
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 06:54 AM, Sam Wilson wrote:
> > In article ,
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 04/05/2013 11:53 PM, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
> >>
> >> | It is funny you should mention that... my questions about using vi
In article ,
Dave Sparro wrote:
> On 4/6/2013 12:46 AM, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
> > So, up until a couple years ago...our webmail address had always been, and
> > only "webmail.ksu.edu". But, under the new directionit has to work as
> > "webmail.ksu.edu", "www.webmail.ksu.edu",
>
In article ,
Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2013, at 10:54 AM, "Ward, Mike S" wrote:
> > Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries for a zone?
>
> Certainly. Various software performs what's called a double-reverse lookup
> to confirm that the A and PTR records match
:
> >> Certainly. Various software performs what's called a double-reverse
> >> lookup
> >> to confirm that the A and PTR records match.
>
> On 01.07.13 10:48, Sam Wilson wrote:
> >Isn't that paranoid reverse lookup? Since reverse lookups can be f
In article ,
Tony Finch wrote:
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >
> > Some software allows to configure the syslog prefix, but I couldn't find
> > that
> > for bind.
>
> Rename the named executable.
Assuming a Unix-like OS would having multiple links (hard or soft) have
the correct effect?
Sam
-
nd PTR records match.
>
> >In article ,
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> He apparently meant exactly the same. Also calles FcRDNS - "forward
> >> confirmed" or "full circle" reverse DNS.
>
> On 01.07.13 14:11, Sam Wilson wrote:
> >
In article ,
Steven Carr wrote:
> On 2 July 2013 14:42, Sam Wilson wrote:
> > Can anyone here give examples of the types of various software that will
> > not operate without a PTR record?
>
> There have already been numerous listings of software that require
> reverse
In article ,
Daniel McDonald wrote:
> On 7/2/13 8:42 AM, "Sam Wilson" wrote:
>
> > There may be a subtle language thing going on here. I read the original
> > post above as saying, literally, "you need PTR records because various
> > software tries t
In article ,
"Novosielski, Ryan" wrote:
> Came across another instance where [reverse lookups] may matter: TCP Wrappers.
> Although the case there was a bit more peculiar -- rr.net does not
> appear to have FORWARD DNS for at least some of its dynamic address
> space. So you can get a PTR, and t
In article ,
Blake Hudson wrote:
> Phil Mayers wrote the following on 11/14/2013 2:39 AM:
> > I think there are better solutions than publishing an enormous list of
> > A/ records, personally, and I think it's good that browser
> > manufacturers aren't blasting out 6 SYNs every time someon
ess it's a delegation to a loadbalancer - a configuration we see
plenty of examples of on this list.
--
Sam Wilson
Communications Infrastructure Section, IT Infrastructure
Information Services, The University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
--
The University of
In article ,
Jason Brandt wrote:
> For now, I've disabled DNS inspection on our firewall, as it is an ancient
> Cisco firewall services module, and that seems to have stabilized things,
> but it's only been 30 minutes or so. Until I get a few days in, I'll keep
> researching.
We used to run DN
In article ,
Jason Brandt wrote:
> The code on our FWSMs isn't the latest release, so that could be part of
> the issue, but it's been about 16 hours now since I shut it off, and so far
> so good. I would say though with the other load on our firewalls, it's
> highly possible that they were bei
In article ,
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> On 2014-04-08 06:08, Bryan Harris wrote:
> > ...
> > The current mechanism is to put the Windows AD server into the
> > resolv.conf BEFORE the BIND servers, since, as has been explained to
> > me a Linux server will perform a query against all three
> > simul
In article ,
Kevin Darcy wrote:
> On 5/9/2014 6:59 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> > Dave Warren wrote:
> >> I actually think that MX records were a boneheaded thing to do, had email
> >> started using SRV records in the first place we might be in a position now
> >> where using SRV records is the defa
In article ,
Scott Bertilson wrote:
> Don't know if you can control the default query type, but this is a RTFM
> (see "man dig"):
>
> It is possible to set per-user defaults for dig via ${HOME}/.digrc. This
> file is read and any options in it are applied before the command line
> arguments.
Y
In article ,
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 01.08.2014 um 17:16 schrieb Barry Margolin:
> > In article ,
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> the thread yesterday reminded me on my Fedora bugrpeort
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073038#c3
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
In article ,
sch...@adi.com (Thomas Schulz) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > xxx.com and IP address 192.168.1.100 is just a example domain name and IP
> > address. Our boss want everybody access our domain example.com through
> > browser, then it will redirect to our web site www.example.com. So I want
>
In article ,
Alan Clegg wrote:
> On 9/10/14, 8:42 AM, Sam Wilson wrote:
>
> > And you could reduce maintenance very slightly by replacing
> >
> > www in A 75.100.245.133
> >
> > with
> >
> > www in CN
In article ,
Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> > If you point www CNAME @, the 'www' will have both MX and NS records same as
> > example.com. Which may e.g. cause rejectd on backup MX hosts, apparently
> > not designed to receive mail for www.exa
In article ,
Steven Carr wrote:
> Without the final explicit "." your name is not fully qualified.
Except in an email address where a trailing "." is illegal.
Sam
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_
In article ,
Bob Harold wrote:
> Anytime you see 'grep' and 'cut' used together, they can usually be
> shortened to just 'awk', which requires starting one less process. And if
> this case it splits fields the way a users sees them, so the same code
> works in both cases:
>
> $ dig +noall +ans
In article ,
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I will be looking more into this. Obvious when you get ones nose
> dragged into time wrong on boot. This is actually a broader problem on
> arm SoC booting. Your logs all have the wrong time for the boot
> messages until there is a network to get time
In article ,
Grant Taylor wrote:
> I think chained CNAMEs fall into the gray area (no mans land) between
> zealots on either side of the RFC interpretation line.
>
> If chained CNAMEs work for you, more power to you. But don't be
> surprised if they fail unexpectedly at some point.
We shoul
In article ,
"Baird, Josh" wrote:
> Any thoughts on a service like Cloudfare's 'CNAME Flattening' [1]?
>
> [1]
> https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-cname-flattening-rfc-compliant-cnames-at-a-domains-root/
Does anyone else find themselves mentally yelling "apex!" whenever they
read the
In article ,
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:02:24PM -0400,
> Rob Heilman wrote
> a message of 305 lines which said:
>
> > We run BIND 9.9.5-9 on Debian x86_64 to support a moderately sized
> > email hosting system. System info listed at the end of this
> > message.
In article ,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 18.05.16 14:10, Con Wieland wrote:
> >I am having an issue resolving www.cloudsat.cira.colostate.edu from 2 of my
> > name servers. I have 2 others with identical configs that resolve
> > correctly. A normal lookup shows a server fail but a +trac
Speaking as a European, at least for now, I suspect the forwarding
mindset is more from the enterprise and security culture rather than
being territorial. There's a viewpoint that says things are better if
they are tightly controlled and predictable, so always using the same
configured path fo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have BIND installed on 3 different computers, all three having the
> same configuration information. I use to use WebMin to update each, but
> that was kind of a pain to have to go to three different systems to make
> a chan
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> A border router knows what is "inside" and "outside" your network, while
> >>> a DNS server does not. Important difference.
> >> You're missing the point. This is not about inside and outside
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Disk i/o is just glacially slow when compared to network
> i/o. To get disk logging up to network speeds you need to
> throw away a lots of it.
Which suggests that having filtering built into the logging
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:53:43PM +0800,
> Ken DBA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 21 lines which said:
>
> > ie, given the domain name www.site.com was pointed to 1.1.1.1 and
> > 2.2.2.2 in Bind. When
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I frequently send short messages to some cellphone users on
>. Several weeks ago I started noticing that bind is having
> problems keeping records for tmomail once they get stale. Specifically
> the MX record. If I restart
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam Wilson wrote:
> > I hadn't noticed it but all the records in the response to a request for
> > the MX for tmomail.net have a TTL of 60 seconds, that's the MX record,
> > t
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> Does anyone still read this list via the comp.protocols.dns.bind Usenet
> gateway? I do, and ever since the web site and mailing list revamp last
> month, it has been a real PITA. About 1/3 of the messages in the group
> have all sorts of MIME garbage in
In article ,
Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
> > extracted the plain text alternative before forwarding.
>
> The old mail server stripped messages down to their plaintext values.
> The new one
In article , sch...@adi.com (Thomas Schulz)
wrote:
> I was wondering what was going on. Some messages are just base64 and are
> completely useless/unreadable.
If you have mimencode you could try this:
$ mimencode -u > /tmp/weird ; less /tmp/weird
On Mac OS X and other systems with the right
In article , sch...@adi.com (Thomas Schulz)
wrote:
> In article ,
> =?UTF-8?B?TGVvbmFyZG8gUm9kcmlndWVzIE1hZ2FsaMOjZXM=?=
> wrote:
> >[base64 guff]
>
>
> You know, the above is not very usefull. Can someone please fix the
> newsgroup gateway.
The content is below. I forward it only be
In article ,
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 08:36:36PM -0800,
> Scott Haneda wrote
> a message of 35 lines which said:
>
> > First, if I learn it is in fact true that all 50K zones will be
> > identical, is there any reason to make 50K zone files?
>
> No.
>
> > Is it
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message , Scott Haneda
> writ
> es:
>
> > Is BCP 38 really as solid and plug and play as it sounds? In a
> > shared, or colo'd environment, can that ISP really deploy something
> > like this, without it causing trouble for those that assume unfettered
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message , Chris
> Thompson writes:
> > On Feb 5 2009, I wrote:
> >
> > >DLV records for advocaat.pro & advocaten.pro are among the recent
> >additions to dlv.isc.org. Using validating recursive nameservers
> > >running BIND 9.5.1-P1 (configured to trust dl
In article , hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, February 20, 2009 at 19:51, serge.fonvi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > Is it possible to set a ddns hostname, say through
> > http://www.changeip.net/ , without using *some_domain* itself, to
> > access this file?
>
> > Not entirely sur
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> A common practice is to create unique names for each machine, in
> addition to the round-robin entry. This way, if you need to perform
> maintenance on a specific machine, you can go to it by its unique name.
> Then you should make the PTR record point t
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Brandon Dimcheff wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to configure BIND to add some records to a domain that I
> > don't control, so that anybody who uses my nameserver will have the
> > additional records. Specifically, I'm trying t
In article ,
David Miller wrote:
> You can have a different TTL for each and every record, if you like, in
> the same zone file with no includes (the $TTL directive can appear
> multiple times).
>
> e.g. :
>
> $TTL 300; 5 mins
> *PTRhost-no-spec.example.com.
> $TTL 3600; 1 ho
In article ,
Alans wrote:
> [ Norwegian Gov vs ISPs, banning domains, and inserting local host
>entries to subvert such a ban ]
>
> Even this way, you should know all the IP of subdomains to work
> properly. Try it for facebook, open homepage fine but once you login it
> will fail.
> Anoth
In article ,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 24.01.11 17:13, rams wrote:
> > y resolver is returning multiple CNAMEs for same hostname. But I believe
> > CNAME should not return same hostname with multiple values.
>
> correct.
>
> > Is this behavior is correct. Could you please clarify me.
In article ,
Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
> I am checking my DNS setup from inside using dig and I am getting
> everything ok but I need a second opinion from outside of the server to
> see if my ns1 and ns2 are responding ok to setup DNSSEC.
Looks like you haven't put in any glue records for nsX.bon
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message , Sam
> Wilson writes:
> > In article ,
> > Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
> >
> > > I am checking my DNS setup from inside using dig and I am getting
> > > everything ok but I need a second opinion from outside
In article ,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On 30/11/11 10:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>Well, that's way too much. The main point of journal is imho to provide
>
> On 30.11.11 11:51, Phil Mayers wrote:
> >I think this is a decision for each operator to make themselves.
>
> I was try
In article ,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 20.12.11 19:37, Martin T wrote:
> >I have seen setups where one domain name has two address records.
> >First IP address is in the ISP-A network and the other one is in the
> >ISP-B network. In case I execute "host www..com", I always
> >get two IP
In article ,
wrote:
> This is not the DNS job to check at the web service availability.
> You could make an external script that is testing for the service availibil=
> ity
> and change the dns accordingly, like (...) :
>
> web1 active ?
> yes : was it active at last test ?
> y
In article ,
Chris Henderson wrote:
> My server works as a secondary for a zone. I asked the master server's
> admin to stop the zone transfer; I didn't get any reply and thus
> commented out the zone's section in my named.conf. But I'm still
> getting zone files coming in to my server.
>
> Her
In article , Danny Mayer
wrote:
> Peter Dambier wrote:
> > Hello Martin,
> >
> > since a major outage at my provider, dtag.de or Deutsche Telecom AG, I have
> > trouble
> > with f.root-servers.net. Sometimes "dig ... +vc" does help me to see
> > f.root-servers.net.
> >
> > The real problem i
In article , Mark Elkins
wrote:
> One place that TCP may make sense - if you are involved in a registry
> system and the process involves actually checking the information that
> you are given, including nameservers (do they exist, do they serve that
> zone - correctly?) - it may make a lot of s
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Sam Wilson wrote:
>
> > In article , Mark Elkins
> > wrote:
> >
> > > One place that TCP may make sense - if you are involved in a registry
> > > system and the process involves actually chec
In article ,
Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On May 13, 2009, at 6:51 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:02:55PM +0800,
> > Tech W. wrote
> > a message of 34 lines which said:
> >
> >> I want to give two NS records for my domain, each NS take each of
> >> the IP set in
In article ,
Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 20-May-2009, at 19:03, John Cole wrote:
>
> > For a concrete example:
> >
> > 10.0.0.0/16 is presently handled by a single zone file.
> > 10.1.3.0/24 is DHCP issued
> > 10.1.4.0/24 is DHCP issued
I note that the last posting in comp.protocols.dns.bind seems to have
been on 4-Jun-09, both on my local news server and on Google Groups. I
can't see any relevant announcements in the archive. What's happened?
Sam
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-us
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> It looks like there are two mail-to-news gateways running for
> bind-users, so every message to the list is being posted twice to the
> newsgroup. ...
But at least messages are now being posted to the newsgroup - the
gatewaying, at least as seen from her
In article ,
Balanagaraju Munukutla <9ba...@sg.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Anybody can help to explain the side effect of configuring the DNS name to
> multiple IP addresses(Round Robin DNS).
If you're planning to use it for load sharing, then the effect is very
basic - requests get shared equal
In article ,
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Freitag 11 September 2009 Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> > However, as M. Bortzmeyer has said, why do this?
>
> Faster queries after a named restart. ...
How often do you restart named? We hit our master once a day, in the
early hours but that's just habit
In article ,
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 05:47:34PM +0100, Sam Wilson wrote:
> > In article ,
> > Balanagaraju Munukutla <9ba...@sg.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Anybody can help to explain the side effect of confi
In article ,
Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago wrote:
> El mar, 15-09-2009 a las 13:45 +0200, Udo Zumdick escribió:
> > Am Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:28:24 +0200
> > schrieb Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago :
> >
> > []
> > > After making changes to zone, updated serial, and rndc reload, I dig my
> > > zone a
In article ,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 23.09.09 14:00, Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago wrote:
> > I no longer manage one of our DNS domain. As I use 'rndc reconfig' to
> > load newly created zones I was wondering if exists a way to do the same
> > as reconfig but inversely, I mean, reload co
In article ,
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Freitag 02 Oktober 2009 Mark Andrews wrote:
> > if (set(allow-query-cache))
> > use allow-query-cache;
> > else if (set(allow-recursion))
> > use allow-recursion;
> > else if (set(allow-query))
> >
ant. ...
> ... It may, however, be better to introduce them
> to dig rather than having to maintain the nslookup command.
Do it. Use host if you have to but stay away from nslookup.
Sam
--
Sam Wilson one of hostmas...@ed.ac.uk
Network Team, IT Infrastructure
Information Serv
In article ,
Kevin Darcy wrote:
> (Fortunately nslookup's whole "won't do a lookup because I can't
> reverse-resolve my resolver" bogosity isn't really an issue at Chrysler,
> since we maintain proper reverse mappings, but that's another popular
> "nslookup sucks, don't use it"-category posti
In article ,
Chris Buxton wrote:
> As I recall, named-checkzone calls out to the operating system stub
> resolver to look up these names. Is there any way the stub resolver
> could be getting different data? Is there anything in the stub
> resolver config (/etc/{hosts,resolv.conf}) that mi
In article ,
Marc Riera wrote:
> Now I have this on my named.conf.options to let me have underscores:
>
> check-names master ignore;
> check-names slave ignore;
Not a good plan. Those checks are in there for a reason, namely that
underscores are invalid in host names. Whils
In article ,
Doug Barton wrote:
> gmspro wrote:
> > What's the main difference between zone and domain?
>
> In what context? Unfortunately both terms get used by various
> people/vendors in different ways. A little more detail is needed to
> answer your question (although if you're talking stri
In article ,
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:59:16PM -0800, Hans Jacobsen wrote:
> > If a.stanford.edu is a cname (say to b.stanford.edu)
> > can I delegate subdomain.a.stanford.edu? Are there documents that
> > point to this being an ok or bad practice?
> >
> > I know all
In article ,
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:47:08PM +0000, Sam Wilson wrote:
> > In article ,
> > Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> [incorrectly]
> > > No.
> ...
> > Not true. CNAME chains - CNAMEs pointing to other CNAMEs - are
> > ineff
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> Recent version of named-checkconf have a -p (print) option which
> will emit named.conf, sans comments, in a consistent style which
> will then be easy to post process.
Shame about the "sans comments" - easy comprehension or easy management
- take your pick.
In article ,
Michal Wesolowski wrote:
> Hello Everyone
>
> I have a problem with Bind 9.3.6-P1 (included in Solaris 10) but honestly I
> don't even understand if it is wrong Bind behaviour or my ignorance. It does
> apply only to some specific cases when external domain delegation is also
> som
In article ,
"Lightner, Jeff" wrote:
> You need an A record for the domain itself:
> superease.net. IN A 202.68.195.36
> www IN A 202.68.195.36
>
> The first one (terminated by the dot) tells it lookup for the domain
> name "superease.net" itself. The dot i
In article ,
Michal Wesolowski wrote:
> My server is caching only, I don't administer ns*.az.pl servers. I'm just
> trying to understand if binds copes well with such an external error. As you
> pointed out both servers fails in some (different) way but second one does
> this only when queried f
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message ,
> Micha
> l Wesolowski writes:
> >
> > After some reading my present understanding is that correct response to
> >
> > query when there is such record in the zone and there exists another record
> > of different type for the same name - is
In article ,
Chris Thompson wrote:
> On Feb 24 2010, Evan Hunt wrote:
>
> >> Thats not the case with DNScurve. Again I stress - over 20 billion
> >> requests per day at OpenDNS are DNScurve compatible. The traffic in
> >> DNSSEC is chicken feed compared to DNScurve.
> >
> >ORG and GOV and quite
In article ,
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Sam Wilson:
>
> > Has anyone found any uz5* servers out there yet?
>
> node.pk, dempsky.org has such name servers. I thought there were
> more. Has the magic prefix changed?
OK. I found none in 130 MB of cache from 3 serve
In article ,
"ic.nssip" wrote:
> I find it useful to test records cache time.
dig tells you that.
> I'll check on BIND 8 package.
> Thank you for pointing to a Solaris compatible source.
Use dig from a recent BIND package, though you may find it's already
there - ours is in /usr/local/bin/
In article ,
wrote:
> dig was added to Solaris 9. It is not native to Solaris 8 or older.
That would explain why it's only where Chris found it on some of our
range of Solarises (vintage or only slightly worn).
> Chris Thompson wrote:
> > On Mar 9 2010,
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <20100309154017.4801c...@the-damian.de>, Torsten writes:
> > Am Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:44:46 +1100
> > schrieb Mark Andrews :
> >
> > >
> > > In message <20100309142153.016c7...@the-damian.de>, Torsten writes:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm a bit cl
In article ,
Gary Wallis wrote:
> Let's say I have this setup :
>
> BIND 9.4 named.conf includes a master.zones file with the following:
>
> ...
> zone "ns1.yourdomain.com" {
> type master;
> file "master/external/n/ns1.yourdomain.com.signed";
>
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
