In article <mailman.575.1266994115.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, Michal Wesolowski <gmic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My server is caching only, I don't administer ns*.az.pl servers. I'm just > trying to understand if binds copes well with such an external error. As you > pointed out both servers fails in some (different) way but second one does > this only when queried for something other than A record. For A everything > is ok. THERE IS A record for virtual.jasnet.pl. Why bad response from > external server for AAAA record affects subsequent queries for A? Which > entry of cache is responsible for this: These: > virtual.jasnet.pl. 3597 A 85.202.208.254 > 3597 CNAME jasnet.pl. You can't have both a CNAME and an A record for the same name. I'm not sure which version of BIND you're using for your cache, but I'm slightly surprised it retains both records. > Is it a case that unexpected response to AAAA query from ns10.az.pl marks > virtual.jasnet.pl invalid even for A queries? It looks like it. > Sorry for my persistence Keep it up. Now you need to talk to the az.pl people and persuade them their server is broken. Sam _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
