In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:53:43PM +0800, > Ken DBA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 21 lines which said: > > > ie, given the domain name www.site.com was pointed to 1.1.1.1 and > > 2.2.2.2 in Bind. When a client query for www.site.com, Bind will > > check the health status for these two servers. If one is > > unavailable,Bind shouldn't direct client's requests to it. > > How BIND could: > > * Know what protocol to test? www.site.com is probably for HTTP but > mail.site.com ? POP ? IMAP ? > > * Embed all these protocols? HTTP, HTTPS, POP, IMAP, BitTorrent, DNS, > whois, FTP, SSH, SMTP... And how could the nameserver know whether the server was accessible from the client, even if it was accessible from the nameserver, and vice versa? Sam _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
