Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Mark Andrews
have a benefit of >> HTTPS/SVCB? That is what I meant. >> regards >> Klaus >> >>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >>> Von: Mark Andrews >>> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 15:55 >>> An: Klaus Darilion >>> Cc: Evan Hunt ; Ga

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Divya
nt: Monday, August 9, 2021 10:48:54 PM Subject: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR No, and there’s no strong usercase for that. The ANAME was wrong on every level from the protocol perspective and I am glad it is gone. Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working ho

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Mark Andrews
CNAME too? > > regards > Klaus > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Ondřej Surý >> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 19:19 >> An: Klaus Darilion >> Cc: Mark Andrews ; bind-users@lists.isc.org >> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR >>

AW: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Klaus Darilion via bind-users
Do you think that we can get rid of CNAME too? regards Klaus > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Ondřej Surý > Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 19:19 > An: Klaus Darilion > Cc: Mark Andrews ; bind-users@lists.isc.org > Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR >

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Evan Hunt
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 01:55:50PM +0200, Klaus Darilion wrote: > But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years > until all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be > implemented in the authoritative name server and hence would work for > every client/resol

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Ondřej Surý
rews >> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 15:55 >> An: Klaus Darilion >> Cc: Evan Hunt ; Gaurav Kansal ; bind- >> us...@lists.isc.org >> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR >> >> Every resolver on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB. Every >&g

AW: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Klaus Darilion via bind-users
s...@lists.isc.org > Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR > > Every resolver on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB. Every > authoritative server on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB via > unknown record format. iOS is already making HTTPS queries for every > we

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Mark Andrews
;> Gesendet: Samstag, 7. August 2021 20:21 >> An: Gaurav Kansal >> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org >> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR >> >>> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote: >>> I need the help in figuring out whethe

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.08.21 13:55, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote: >But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years > until all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be > implemented in the authoritative name server resolving on authoritative server could in fact hel

AW: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Klaus Darilion via bind-users
> On 09.08.21 13:55, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote: > >But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years > > until all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be > > implemented in the authoritative name server > > resolving on authoritative server could

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote: > I need the help in figuring out whether BIND supports ANAME ? If yes, > then from which version on wards ? No, it doesn't. The effort to standardize ANAME stalled, and I doubt it'll be coming back. The new HTTPS and SVCB records

AW: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-09 Thread Klaus Darilion via bind-users
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: bind-users Im Auftrag von Evan > Hunt > Gesendet: Samstag, 7. August 2021 20:21 > An: Gaurav Kansal > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR > > On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaur

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-08 Thread Gaurav Kansal
Ok. Thanks a lot. Sent from my iPhone > On 07-Aug-2021, at 11:51 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > Hi, > > no, ANAME is dead standard and it has been replaced by HTTPS SVCB: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/ > > The support for the draft is in review and it will be m

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-07 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi, no, ANAME is dead standard and it has been replaced by HTTPS SVCB: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/ The support for the draft is in review and it will be merged some time this year. -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be d

Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-07 Thread Evan Hunt
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote: > I need the help in figuring out whether BIND supports ANAME ? If yes, > then from which version on wards ? No, it doesn't. The effort to standardize ANAME stalled, and I doubt it'll be coming back. The new HTTPS and SVCB records lo

Does BIND supports ANAME RR

2021-08-07 Thread Gaurav Kansal
Hi guys, I need the help in figuring out whether BIND supports ANAME ? If yes, then from which version on wards ? Use case of ANAME RR is explained here - [ https://www.isc.org/blogs/cname-at-the-apex-of-a-zone/ | https://www.isc.org/blogs/cname-at-the-apex-of-a-zone/ ] Thanks. Gaurav Kan