No, and there’s no strong usercase for that. The ANAME was wrong on every level from the protocol perspective and I am glad it is gone.
Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 9. 8. 2021, at 17:23, Klaus Darilion via bind-users > <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > > Does every application that uses gethostbyname have a benefit of HTTPS/SVCB? > That is what I meant. > regards > Klaus > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> >> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 15:55 >> An: Klaus Darilion <klaus.daril...@nic.at> >> Cc: Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org>; Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kan...@nic.in>; bind- >> us...@lists.isc.org >> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR >> >> Every resolver on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB. Every >> authoritative server on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB via >> unknown record format. iOS is already making HTTPS queries for every >> webpage. I believe other browsers also make HTTPS queries today. Go look >> at your DNS traffic. >> >> The MR mentioned earlier allows named and the other tools to load and >> display the records in presentation format and to do the additional section >> processing. None of that it required to be able to return these records. >> It >> just makes it easier. >> >> Just about all the other DNS vendors also have code that can read and >> display presentation format. >> >> ANAME is dead. >> -- >> Mark Andrews >> >>> On 9 Aug 2021, at 21:53, Klaus Darilion via bind-users <bind- >> us...@lists.isc.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>> Von: bind-users <bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org> Im Auftrag von Evan >>>> Hunt >>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 7. August 2021 20:21 >>>> An: Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kan...@nic.in> >>>> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org >>>> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR >>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote: >>>>>> I need the help in figuring out whether BIND supports ANAME ? If yes, >>>>>> then from which version on wards ? >>>>> >>>>> No, it doesn't. The effort to standardize ANAME stalled, and I doubt >>>>> it'll be coming back. >>>>> >>>>> The new HTTPS and SVCB records look like a better approach anyway. >>>>> BIND will have support for those pretty soon. >>> >>> But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years until >> all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be >> implemented in the authoritative name server and hence would work for >> every client/resolver as client/resolver never sees the ANAME but only the >> A/AAAA record. >>> >>> regards >>> Klaus >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to >>> unsubscribe >> from this list >>> >>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support >> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more >> information. >>> >>> >>> bind-users mailing list >>> bind-users@lists.isc.org >>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
