Does every application that uses gethostbyname have a benefit of HTTPS/SVCB? That is what I meant. regards Klaus
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> > Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 15:55 > An: Klaus Darilion <klaus.daril...@nic.at> > Cc: Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org>; Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kan...@nic.in>; bind- > us...@lists.isc.org > Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR > > Every resolver on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB. Every > authoritative server on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB via > unknown record format. iOS is already making HTTPS queries for every > webpage. I believe other browsers also make HTTPS queries today. Go look > at your DNS traffic. > > The MR mentioned earlier allows named and the other tools to load and > display the records in presentation format and to do the additional section > processing. None of that it required to be able to return these records. It > just makes it easier. > > Just about all the other DNS vendors also have code that can read and > display presentation format. > > ANAME is dead. > -- > Mark Andrews > > > On 9 Aug 2021, at 21:53, Klaus Darilion via bind-users <bind- > us...@lists.isc.org> wrote: > > > > > >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: bind-users <bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org> Im Auftrag von Evan > >> Hunt > >> Gesendet: Samstag, 7. August 2021 20:21 > >> An: Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kan...@nic.in> > >> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > >> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR > >> > >>> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote: > >>> I need the help in figuring out whether BIND supports ANAME ? If yes, > >>> then from which version on wards ? > >> > >> No, it doesn't. The effort to standardize ANAME stalled, and I doubt > >> it'll be coming back. > >> > >> The new HTTPS and SVCB records look like a better approach anyway. > >> BIND will have support for those pretty soon. > > > > But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years until > all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be > implemented in the authoritative name server and hence would work for > every client/resolver as client/resolver never sees the ANAME but only the > A/AAAA record. > > > > regards > > Klaus > > _______________________________________________ > > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > > unsubscribe > from this list > > > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support > subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more > information. > > > > > > bind-users mailing list > > bind-users@lists.isc.org > > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
