> On 09.08.21 13:55, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote: > >But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years > > until all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be > > implemented in the authoritative name server > > resolving on authoritative server could in fact help, and wouldn't need > protocol > change at all, but the problem above is crucial (what would you do in case > of failure? refuse whole zone?)
Resolving is done when there is an incoming query, not on zone loading. So if the auth's resolver (either a full blown resolver or a stub resolver which forwards to another resolver) fails to resolve I would just forward this error to the client's resolver. regards Klaus _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
