not)
and everything else from the interwebs (which they are).
Most significantly though, I'm not just trying to resolve the issue but
actually fix my understanding of BIND and learn where I am going wrong
here.
Kind regards,
Mike.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Visit http
packagers as stable.
And now libuv is crashing macOS arbitrarily?
Why is the bind project using such a library that seems to be perennially
unstable?
Mike
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid
ections take too long and there
must be a network error.
Mike Mitchell
-Original Message-
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Ondrej Surý
Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 4:40 PM
To: BIND Users Mailing List
Subject: fixed rrset ordering - is this still a thing?
EXTERNAL
Hey,
BIND 9 suppor
This doesn't appear to be an IPv6-specific issue. In principle named should
also be capable of listening on all of 127/8, but I can't find any
configuration syntax that will do more than listen on 127.0.0.1. I can ping
127.0.0.2 (and so on) but even explicitly adding listen-on 127.0.0.2 won't
c
Hi, I am new here, but have been using BIND since 1994.
I am confused by the issue herein and maybe someone has an idea of at least
what group I should be talking to.
I have a Debian based operation and my BIND9 servers run on Debian. BUT...
This is really about BIND as it interacts with my I
than getting any random
service to do it for you.
Mike
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 7:45 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> >> > On 5. 1. 2023, at 14:46, Robert M. Stockmann
> wrote:
> >> > This is like Mercedes Benz announcing they will only sell
> >> > the Ba
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022, 15:29 Greg Choules <
gregchoules+bindus...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike.
> No need to shoot. I missed your first message to the list.
>
> Have you tried other popular open resolver services, to compare how they
> each behave and see whether there ar
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 2:24 PM Greg Choules <
gregchoules+bindus...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike.
> OK, let's try and do some practical things here.
>
> Firstly, please share your /etc/resolv.conf
>
nameserver 1.1.1.1
as I said in my first message to the list.
&
o please tone down on the snarkiness. I get it that you might be
> frustrated, but this mailing list is not a place to vent off your
> frustration.
>
I'm more frustrated by the answer to "stop obfuscating so we can help" ; I
did not initially ask the question "
d the
entire text into an edit box at the bottom.
But still. 12 tries to get different results and finally get the 1 result I
expect is utterly crap.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 1:11 PM Mike Hodson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 4:57 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hidi
4 tries later,
I get the results I expect.
Now, for the delegation I was wondering about; it ONLY took THREE tries to
get dig to return these results:
mike@mike-pc:~$ dig -x 208.51.60.0 SOA +trace
; <<>> DiG 9.18.1-1ubuntu1.1-Ubuntu <<>> -x 208.51.60.0 SOA
ll I get is the root-servers instead of any sort of reverse looking up
happening at all.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Mike
$ dig -x 208.x.x.x +trace
; <<>> DiG 9.18.1-1ubuntu1.1-Ubuntu <<>> -x 208.x.x.x +trace
;; global options: +cmd
. 509
> HE has a lot of IPv6 educational materials (not bind-specific) that are quite
> good.
I wasn't aware, but this looks worthy and I'm going to do it:
https://ipv6.he.net/certification/
Also to the OP here's another +1 that Debian 10 bind version does IPv6 just
fine, and +1 upgrade it anyway be
Sorry, wrong list.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2021 8:57:34 AM
Subject: Expanding my Use of Optio
aren't in
the same LAN anymore. However, the DSLAMs (currently) are.
I assume this is less about Webmin and more about ISC-DHCP.
Unfortunately, I don't remember much of when I set up that DHCP server to
remember the nuances of ISC DHCP and option 82.
Any guidance?
-
Hi,
We recently upgraded to 9.16.2 on FreeBSD 11.3 STABLE and after ~
week of use, it died this morning with the following assertion. Any
ideas what this might be about ?
May 3 05:36:27 ns named[845]: name.c:1738: INSIST(nlabels ==
name->labels) failed, back trace
May 3 05:36:27 ns nam
=/bin/kill -TERM $MAINPID
PrivateTmp=true
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
I've been trying to track down a (probably) unrelated dnssec issue resolving
theoptimalfinancialgroup.com and this error has distracted me from my
investigation.
Hello all, I have a small problem, and I was wondering if someone could help
me. My bind9 dns gets a query for loopback. I have tried and tried to define
the word loopback in the dns as a forward zone with reverse loopkup, but
doesn't seem to take. I have tried to CNAME it using localhost, but
set bind-users mail
==
This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This
message contains c
I was afraid that would be the answer, time to try some other solutions
then.
Thanks.
On 05/06/2019 12:03, Tony Finch wrote:
> Mike Woods wrote:
>>
>> So, the long and short of things, is it actually possible to point the
>> response policy at a forward zone
>
> N
r this it fails to start and it's not clear from the documentation if
this needs to be a physical zone file or not.
So, the long and short of things, is it actually possible to point the
response policy at a forward zone or am I pissing my time up th
alphazulu send as @foxtrot.com.
>
> Would @alphazulu.com appear anywhere in the headers?
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Mike Ragusa wrote:
>
>> Glad to help! If you need a low cost DMARC reporting service, I would
>> recommend www.dmarcian.com
>>
>> On Mo
Glad to help! If you need a low cost DMARC reporting service, I would
recommend www.dmarcian.com
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:33 AM project722 wrote:
> Thanks guys - very helpful information indeed.
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Mike Ragusa wrote:
>
>> Ideally it i
Ideally it is best to use both technologies and then put DMARC on top to
ensure reporting and enforcement of the policies. DKIM cryptographically
signs your messages and SPF informs receiving mail servers of who is
allowed to send on your behalf. You should not think of using only one or
the other
etc/sysctl.conf
net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_udp_timeout_stream = 45
net.nf_conntrack_max = 50
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh1 = 512
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh2 = 1024
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh3 = 2048
net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 4096
net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 30
net.ipv4.tcp_tw_recycle = 1
If you are crawling lots of new names, the cache size won't have much
impact. Each new query will require recursing vs hitting the cache. Try
"rndc recursing" and look at what you have sitting around waiting for
answers. Hopefully that provides some clues. This can be all sorts of
things like u
ailto:ma...@isc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 5:19 PM
To: Mike Bernhardt
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND started replying to queries for .com with .COM
Your monitoring probe is broken.
STD 13 says that that the DNS is case preserving. The problem is that lots
of servers aren't ca
I rebooted one of our BIND VMs this morning. It's running BIND 9.10.3-P3. We
noticed that queries for domains with domain.com were answered with
domain.COM with the .COM in capital letters. Other high-levels like .org
were not changed. It caused a monitoring probe to complain because it wasn't
gett
there also to see if it's possible
to build a virtual interface for the IP, but I doubt it.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch [mailto:d...@dotat.at]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 5:40 PM
To: Mike Bernhardt
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: PCS, Corosync, Pacemaker, and Bi
My apologies, never mind :-{
I don't know what the problem was, BIND seems to load up just fine today,
even when the option addresses don't match the virtual address. I must have
screwed up something else.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman
.@dotat.at]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 5:40 PM
To: Mike Bernhardt
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: PCS, Corosync, Pacemaker, and Bind
Mike Bernhardt wrote:
>
> I'm setting up a new CentOS 7 DNS server cluster to replace our very
> old CentOS 4 cluster. The old one us
an IP address that is not on an
interface, or
2) There is a way to tell corosync (hopefully using pcsd) to create a
virtual interface, not just a virtual address, so BIND can find it.
Mike Bernhardt
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listi
Do you really want to return RFC1918 to the Internet? Not the end of the
world, but some consider it unnecessary information disclosure. :-)
I've seen this on various WAN/fw/router used at home over the years (arris,
cisco, linksys, etc) and unlike the commands Reindal shared which are geared
Yes you can run without the chroot. Years ago it was considered best practice
to chroot and most power users would have said you were insane not to do so.
Now there are increasingly many who say it's not worth the effort (fairly easy
to get around in many cases) -- do a bit of google engineeri
On 1/13/16, 4:02 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Reindl
Harald" wrote:
>Am 13.01.2016 um 19:54 schrieb Mike Hoskins (michoski):
>> I've ran several large DNS infras over the years. Back in 2005/6 I
>> finally drank the koolaid and
On 1/13/16, 10:28 AM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
>Am 13.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Lightner, Jeff:
>> We chose to do BIND on physical for our externally authoritative
>>servers.
>>
>> We use Windows DNS for internal.
>>
>> One thing you should do if yo
I believe that's called a LAME nameserver,
correct? What happens? Does it answer the query regardless? Does specifying the
NS record in the zone simply confirm to the remote site that this is a valid
nameserver for this zone?
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.is
S ns2.d-zone.ca <== Addition
What happens if I do one without the other? I guess I don't fully understand
the relationship between the name servers listed in the zone versus the ones
found in my domain record. I'm running BIND locally, if
On 11/18/15, 1:19 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Carl
Byington" wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 10:47 -0500, Barry Margolin wrote:
>> While that's the pedantically correct answer, in practice it doesn't
>> work well when your us
On 11/18/15, 10:47 AM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
Barry Margolin" wrote:
>In article ,
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> when a result looks like below it needs to be fixed and "Are there any
>> BIND specific workarounds?" is the wrong question becaus even if - the
>> domain owner
type master;
file "data/ext_test.mydomain.com";
};
# other slave zones
zone "yyy.mydomain.com" {
type slave;
file "data/yyy.mydomain.com";
masters {
172.26.1.1;
};
};
};
-Mike
___
On 9/4/15, 9:29 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Noel
Butler" wrote:
>On 05/09/2015 04:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> mostly people who are throwing as much as possible appliances and
>> firewalls in front of their machines doing that because missing
>> knowledge
>
>and falling
On 9/4/15, 1:12 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
/dev/rob0"
wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:02:23PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 03.09.2015 um 22:59 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>> >On 09/03/2015 04:35 PM, Leandro wrote:
>> >>Ok ...
>> >>I got BIND 9.10.2-P3 working.
>> >
Few points for clarification:
With rhel/centos you're not getting the major version as reported. You
need to look at the changlog for the package to see what fixes/features
have been backported. That effort including associated QA is part of what
you're paying for with rhel or getting for free a
On 8/24/15, 6:40 AM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Reindl
Harald" wrote:
>
>Am 24.08.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Ken Peng:
>> I know it's DNS as a service.
>> But what's the standard? how to implement it?
>
>it's just a buzzword for DNS hosting
You could also say "SaaS" is just a buz
DNS and BIND is the de facto standard:
http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596100575.do
Getting stale, but some good info:
https://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-bind-template.html
Good reference:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/
...and of course the ARM for your BIND version:
https://kb.isc
On 6/19/15, 4:07 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
/dev/rob0"
wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 02:55:23PM -0500, I wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:11:16PM +,
>>Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
>snip
>> Note that connection tracking
On 6/19/15, 1:16 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Reindl
Harald" wrote:
>Am 19.06.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Mike Hoskins (michoski):
>> I suppose the only way to avoid any "intermediate" firewalls would be to
>> place everything you run on a LA
x27;dmesg' about connection tracking tables being full? You
>>>may
>>>need some 'NOTRACK' rules in your iptables.
>
>On 18.06.15 23:11, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
>>Just following along, for the record... On our side, iptables is
>>completely
Inline...
On 6/18/15, 9:22 AM, "Cathy Almond" wrote:
>On 18/06/2015 12:00, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 17.06.15 22:39, Shawn Zhou wrote:
>>> BIND on my resolvers reaches the max open file limit and I am getting
>>> lots
>>> of SERVFAILs
>>> http://pastebin.com/SxRsHLff
>>
>>> After I i
On 6/18/15, 7:09 PM, "Stuart Browne"
wrote:
>Just wondering. You mention you're using RHEL6; are you also getting
>messages in 'dmesg' about connection tracking tables being full? You may
>need some 'NOTRACK' rules in your iptables.
Just following along, for the record... On our side, iptabl
Inline...responding to each of these including Kathy's soon (thanks to the
community for the responses). Following with interest as we've seen this
for awhile, though we are possibly a special case which I'll describe more
in another response.
On 6/18/15, 7:00 AM, "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote
I'm not sure if BIND has a separate tunable for the "timeout vs true
negative answer" scenario you seem to describe, but have you tried setting
max-ncache-ttl very low to see if it affects this?
On 6/11/15, 9:27 AM, "Gerd v. Egidy" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've got a bind running as recursive resolver be
FWIW as another data point we've seen the same in the wild across
RHEL/CentOS 5.x and 6.x on "large" (32 core) Xeon based servers
(E5-2650's), including 6.6 with the 2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64 kernel.
Observed while debugging other things, and haven't had time to follow up.
-Original Message--
Hi folks,
I've read about RRL with interest since its inception, but just now
getting around to rolling it out. That is partially because we run a very
small authoritative infrastructure serving mostly as Akamai EDNS origins.
However, since it is exposed externally, used by a few tenants and RRL
Another option might be changing 'file' to 'syslog' then using stuff like
":msg, contains, 'skipping nameserver' stop" (or whatever pattern you want
to match) in your rsyslog configuration.
http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/rsyslog_conf_filter.html
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald
Organiz
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:44 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: com.google how did they do that
>Am 01.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Thomas Schulz:
>> As of the time I am sending this, yo
The answer is BIND does accept TCP queries by default (it's required to be
RFC compliant), but a lot of times upstream firewalls/ACLs/etc block TCP,
munge UDP packet size, etc... Just firing up BIND with basic
configuration and checking netstat will show you TCP 53 listening. If
it's not working
-Original Message-
From: John
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 7:29 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: SRV records etc
>How useful are SRV records? Are they worth installing? What are their
>benefits, and pitfalls?
>Similar question about HINFO.
In my limited experience, this
The other thing is, you mention having tried and failed (agreed that isn't a
bad thing, we've all failed countless times and it's how we learn)...how have
you failed?
What I think you'll find is you have a list (many lists and other resources
really) of mentors. BIND much like many other Inter
Thanks for digging in so fast. Our mitigation will be sticking to
9.9.6-P1, since we like ESV anyway.
Wanted to point out that (perhaps sadly) this isn't so crazypants...or at
least not uncommon. The *edge* and *aka* references speak Akamai DNS+CDN.
From my last overview, this has gotten cleane
For what little it's worth, I've seen this somewhat even on 9.8 (it's not new),
though increasingly on 9.9...not saying it's BIND specific, just that I've hit
these kind of annoyances with remote servers awhile now.
I've tried explaining this on numerous internal email threads, tickets, webex
(
Anyone have some input on this? No one has commented so far.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt [mailto:bernha...@bart.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 11:59 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: BIND resource requirements
We are currently using 9.8. We have had it on the
We are currently using 9.8. We have had it on the radar to move to 9.9 but
it's been low priority since 9.8 is still supported for now. But in reading
about all of the alleged issues with 9.10.x as well as possible increased
resource use starting with 9.9.5, I would like to ask a question: We have
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sparro
Date: Friday, October 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Diagnostic help part 2
>On 10/1/2014 3:45 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
>> (Sorry for straying off topic. I have less experience of Cisco PIX/ASA
>> breaking DNS than of them
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Diagnostic help part 2
>On 10/1/14 8:17 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
>> In article ,
>> Eli Heady wrote:
>>
>>> With response sizes growing (dnssec, ipv6), answers
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton
Date: Friday, September 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM
To: Mike Hoskins , Thomas Schulz ,
"bind-us...@isc.org"
Subject: Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?
>On 9/12/14 11:07 AM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
>> I do have a lot of interest in th
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schulz
Date: Friday, September 12, 2014 at 11:47 AM
To: "bind-us...@isc.org"
Subject: Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?
>> Mike Hoskins wrote:
>>
>> Do you guys have max-cache-size set? I didn't see it in the
>>
Do you guys have max-cache-size set? I didn't see it in the borderworlds
named.conf. I've seen similar growth problems when testing 9.x before
setting that (experiment at the time just to see what would happen, and
confirmed this behavior). Set sensible resource limits based on available
resourc
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Date: Friday, August 8, 2014 at 6:33 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Logs problem with Bind 9.9.4
>so if you have nothing to say go back from where you came
abusive
>why do you reply off-l
-Original Message-
From: Evan Hunt
Date: Monday, August 4, 2014 at 1:26 PM
To: John Anderson
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Metazones or Something Else?
>> So to the best of your knowledge this functionality is still on drawing
>> board, unless implemented out-of-band? (i.
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Date: Friday, August 1, 2014 at 9:23 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: rndc (and now nsupdate too)
>
>Am 01.08.2014 um 15:14 schrieb Mike Hoskins (michoski):
>> Fro
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch
Date: Friday, August 1, 2014 at 5:31 AM
To: Reindl Harald
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: rndc (and now nsupdate too)
>Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 31.07.2014 um 21:08 schrieb /dev/rob0:
>> >
>> > The proper tool to manage zone data is nsup
I haven't used those, but not sure if smokeping's DNS plugin would do what
you want.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Greene
Date: Monday, July 21, 2014 at 11:59 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Tools to automatically test the resolution speed ...
>Hi Team,
>
>I'm going to get m
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Date: Sunday, July 13, 2014 at 6:24 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: initial lookup fails every time
>On 12.07.14 01:19, Tony Publiski wrote:
>> I'm hoping someone has seen this before. I'm running a couple of BIND
>> 9.8.2 DN
-Original Message-
From: Gary Wallis
Date: Sunday, July 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Public facing authoritative NS all masters
>Hello,
>
>What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for
>the set of authoritative NSs?
>
>For example
-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews
Date: Friday, July 11, 2014 at 8:41 PM
To: Mike Hoskins
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Caching Nameserver and BIND RPM Compatibility
>Not every *important* fix is a *security* fix.
>
>OS vendor that just backport
-Original Message-
From: Asai
Date: Friday, July 11, 2014 at 12:56 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Caching Nameserver and BIND RPM Compatibility
>Greetings,
>
>We're setting up caching-nameserver on an existing BIND instance. The
>version of BIND is 9.7. Is there a specific co
-Original Message-
From: Samad Agha
Date: Friday, June 27, 2014 at 1:07 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" , DNS BIND
Subject: In BIND 8.2 running on Solaris 8, how to start logging
>Hi All,
>I have two Solaris 8 servers running BIND 8.2. I'd like to retire them
>both and transfer everyth
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas F Miller
Date: Thursday, June 5, 2014 at 10:25 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: SPF RR type
>Are SPF RR types finally dead or not? I¹ve read through rfc7208 it
>appears that they are:
>
> "SPF records MUST be published as a DNS TXT (type 16)
Cisco (apply liberal amounts of salt considering my FROM) has a product
suite called Prime, one piece of which is CNR (unless it's been renamed
again this week) -- Cisco Network Registrar, which handles the IPAM piece
and has DHCP and DNS components as well. CNR can integrate with BIND (as
well as
iew axfr from the other?
What I did in testing (and not very much at that) was to define the
zones twice with different file names. Seemed to work fine ... at least
the zone files and the journal files were created for both file names.
--
Mike Meredith, University of Portsmouth
Principal Syst
ve
somehow messed up? Or perhaps there's some option I've missed? Or am I
out of luck?
--
Mike Meredith, University of Portsmouth
Principal Systems Engineer, Hostmaster, Security, and Timelord!
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mail
In the past when doing this with Cisco GSS I followed Akamai's example,
and had success with stuff like (gdns* were the CSS):
; delegation of gslb.domain.com
$TTL 172800 ; 2 days
gdns1.domain.com. A a.b.c.d
gdns2.domain.com. A e.f.g.h
gdns3.domain.com. A i.j.k.l
g
Hi Jason,
I've experienced similar things in the past on 9.8. Since then we've
moved to the latest 9.9, but don't think this is at all version specific
(that said, you could obviously try upgrading). I don't have an exact
solution for you, but some ideas of things to check and personal
experienc
From: , Frank
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Difference between BIND 9.8 and 9.9
>Hello
>
>is there a link to a documentation that lists the main differences
>between BIND 9.8 and 9.9 ?
>
>I would like to read it before swiching from 9.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schulz
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
>> I just remembered there was also the change to the db file
>> having a default raw format on slaves unless specified.
>
>Interes
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt
Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 3:25 PM
To: "'Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.'" ,
"bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
>Thanks for that. I just remembered there was also the change
: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
On 01/16/14 16:39, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Bernhardt
> Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM
> To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
> Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
>
>>
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt
Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
>Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to ask this:
>And if it is indeed enabled regardless of my RFC1918 ranges,
cing
server which of course has no RFC1918, I would leave it to the default
setting?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt [mailto:bernha...@bart.gov]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:03 PM
To: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org'
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
Am I correct in
ny defined or not.
On 01/14/14 12:16, Mike Bernhardt wrote:
> Is there anything I need to know regarding changes in default
> operation when upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4? I'm specifically looking
> for changes that must be addressed in named.conf options in order to
> keep a
ect: Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
>IIRC, The main change I ran into when I upgraded to 9.9.2-P1 (from
>9.7.6-P4) was the change in default for empty-zones. All are enabled by
>default, including RFC1918 ranges whether you have any defined or not.
>
>On 01/14/14 12:16, Mike Be
Is there anything I need to know regarding changes in default operation when
upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4? I'm specifically looking for changes that
must be addressed in named.conf options in order to keep an upgrade as
transparent as possible.
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari
Date: Friday, December 20, 2013 12:15 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Adding DS records
>On Dec 20, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote:
>>> Has anyone been able to g
-Original Message-
From: Bob McDonald
Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 7:10 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Delegation and Forwarding
>I'm a bit confused on the need for a blank forwarders statement inside of
>a zone statement in the named.conf file. Given an internal zone
-Original Message-
From: Blake Hudson
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:03 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: RHEL 6 CPU load
>Daniel, what do you see the load as? I see 4.6% CPU usage (100% possible
>- 95.4% idle).
Wondering the same. Don't consider 0.00 high load. ;
-Original Message-
From: Listas
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:57 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Size boundaries for zones of IPv6 rDNS
>Hi!
>
>Are there size limits for zones of IPv6 reverse DNS ?
>
>For example, is this a valid zone?
>
>5.a.8.3.4.f.3.0.c.a.d.f.ip6.arp
-Original Message-
From: Birta Levente
Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:29 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: logging query time
>Hi
>
>I have a caching nameserver (bind 9.8.2) and I curious if I can log the
>duration of queries to the forwarders?
not that i know of easily (
-Original Message-
From: Alan Clegg
Date: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:28 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Bind server crashing (lots of EAGAIN, ENOENT, ...). With
strace log.
>
>On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:31 AM, K L wrote:
>
>> Here is a strace log from when it happens:
>>
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
