-----Original Message----- From: Gary Wallis <wgg1...@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, July 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" <bind-users@lists.isc.org> Subject: Public facing authoritative NS all masters
>Hello, > >What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for >the set of authoritative NSs? > >For example given: > >[root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short >dns1.tribune.com. >dns2.tribune.com. >dns4.tribune.com. >dns3.tribune.com. > >Where all 4 dnsN servers are in fact masters (this is just a >hypothetical, the NS above are most likely secondary servers) I'm not aware of any drawbacks from a strict DNS perspective. There could be administrative overhead depending how you set it up, but we have hidden masters which allow central control of our "public masters" which in turn serve a few zones + act as origins for services like Akamai. It's worked well for us over the past decade. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
