Message: I am following the instructions provided in the knowledge base and I
am having issues with the upgrade of my bind server to version 9.20.6 I am
currently on version BIND 9.16.23-RH
I run this command and it works fine ./configure
--prefix=/usr/local/bind-9.9.6 --sysconfdir=/etc -
installed nor do I believe I can install one for my hardware.
>
> Mark
>
>> On 6 Nov 2024, at 02:32, N M wrote:
>>
>> What changed between bind-9.18.30 and bind-9.18.31 that would cause it to
>> not compile? We can compile bind-9.18.30 just fine but bind-9.18.3
What changed between bind-9.18.30 and bind-9.18.31 that would cause it to not
compile? We can compile bind-9.18.30 just fine but bind-9.18.31 fails with
netmgr/udp errors:
netmgr/udp.c:813:8: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [enabled by default]
static _Atomic(isc_stdtime_t) last_udpsends
istaken, I know of other local admin who
> moved to unbound because of this, I hope we are not next, but I suspect we
> will be.
>
> vent over.
>
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org st...@stokkie.net
--
Visit https://lists.isc
Am 04.11.2023 um 19:41:44 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
> Thanks for the reply. Interesting.
> Option A - It works but I would like to stop maintaining two
> different servers with the same data.
> Option B - I have no chance of getting the company to agree to IPv6.
Then you are in a st
Am 03.11.2023 um 20:12:59 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
> I have those lines, but if I remove them, then presumably I cannot
> have internal overrides anywhere, like a hosts file would or like
> dnsmasq would?
BIND doesn't care about /etc/hosts.
If you make it authoritative for a zone,
Am 03.11.2023 um 19:54:32 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt:
> How do you mean remove the zone information?
In your /etc/bind are configuration files.
Look for named.conf* and find those that include zones:
zone "f.8.1.1.0.7.1.0.1.0.a.2.ip6.arpa" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/db.f.8.1.1.0.7.1.0.1.0.a.2.i
Am 03.11.2023 um 19:18:49 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
> Can the bind-internal not be made to caching only and not
> authoritative? If so, how?
Of course it can, simply remove the zone configuration, but it will
then cache the records from the authoritative server (your
"external-bind
Am 03.11.2023 um 19:15:45 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
> You are preaching to the converted, but we have a huge mix of SLES
> 11, Ubuntu 16, 18, 20 and 22 machines + Windows Server 2016. Getting
> them all current is a long term project and it has to go through all
> sorts of customer a
Am 03.11.2023 um 17:58:51 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
> On 03/11/2023 17:54, Marco M. wrote:
> > Am 03.11.2023 um 17:48:32 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
> >
> >> My problem is the use of external IP's duplicated between the
> >> inte
Am 03.11.2023 um 17:48:32 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
> My problem is the use of external IP's duplicated between the
> internal and external masters for some IPs/FQDNs which I want to get
> rid of.
Implement IPv6 and get rid of the old IPv4 technology for internal
communication.
It
Am 03.11.2023 um 15:51:32 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
> As this site is externally accessible as well, we also have to put an
> identical entry in bind-external so we end up having many identical
> entries in bind-internal and bind-external.
It seems they people who set that up didn't
Am 03.11.2023 um 15:20:50 Uhr schrieb Amaury Van Pevenaeyge:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm currently a final year Master's student at the Free University of
> Brussels. As part of my Master's thesis, I have to implement a DNS
> amplification scenario within a Cyber Range. However, before
> achieving
Am 02.11.2023 um 12:02:00 Uhr schrieb Mosharaf Hossain:
> We are receiving the traffic form random IP addresses to DNS servers.
Even when those IP addresses change, can you verify in any way that
those are not spoofed, so the traffic originates rom that networks?
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/m
Am 30.10.2023 um 12:25:32 Uhr schrieb Mosharaf Hossain:
> mofa.gov.bd.86400 IN NS ns1.bcc.gov.bd.
> mofa.gov.bd.86400 IN NS ns2.bcc.gov.bd.
> couldn't get address for 'ns1.bcc.gov.bd': not found
> couldn't get address for 'ns2.bcc.gov.bd': not found
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, [utf-8] OndÅej Surý wrote:
> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 14:51:52 +0100
> From: "[utf-8] OndÅej Surý"
> To: Robert M. Stockmann
> Cc: BIND users
> Subject: Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9.18: Differentiated Services
> Code Point (DSCP) supp
20 because it's already non-operational.
>
This is like Mercedes Benz announcing they will only sell
the Baby Benz model, which is a Volkswagen EV barebonez with
the VW logo replaced with a plastic Mercedes Benz star.
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Speciali
Thank you all for the replies.
For what I understand after reading your replies (I might be wrong :) ),
reverse lookups fail when I have no outgoing
connection because some caching or or transfer is needed from
66.136.193.in-addr.arpa. , wich I don't control. This
is divided in several networks,
;; ANSWER SECTION:
stokkie.net.21600 IN A 84.87.53.162
;; Query time: 23 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Sun Sep 25 07:46:18 2022
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 45
$
Is this proper behavior ?
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crash
ns1lux.europa.eu) in 18 ms
www.ecb.europa.eu. 300 IN CNAME www-ecb-europa-eu.ax4z.com.
;; Received 86 bytes from 156.154.64.109#53(pdns109.ultradns.com) in 25 ms
0.00user 0.00system 0:00.56elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 17072maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (15major+1204minor)pagefaults
.net.
. 5812IN NS g.root-servers.net.
--//--
;; Received 891 bytes from 147.67.12.3#53(ns2lux.europa.eu) in 16 ms
www.ecb.europa.eu. 300 IN CNAME www-ecb-europa-eu.ax4z.com.
;; Received 86 bytes from 2001:502:4612::91#53(pdns109.ultradns.org) in 4 m
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I wanted to update my BIND server to the current version 9.10.17 and keep
getting stuck in the compile process.
First I compiled and installed the tool "NGHTTP/2" under
"/user/local/nghttp2/1.43.0/".
But the "CONFIGURE" - process constantly brings me the error messag
Hi!
Are there any best practices on troubleshooting slow queries?
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact
article "C11 atomic variables and
the kernel" By Jonathan Corbet, February 18, 2014
https://lwn.net/Articles/586838/
Best Regards,
Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org st...@stokkie.net
_
!
- Mensagem Original
--
Assunto: dnssec-signzone
De: "David Alexandre M. de Carvalho"
Data:Seg, Abril 6, 2020 4:05 pm
Para:bind-users@lis
group to "named", and they are both readable.
Could anyone please tell me what am I doing wrong?
also, do I need to generate those 2 .key and .private files if I intend to sign
my several reverse zones?
Thank you very much!
Regards
Os melhores cumprimentos
David Alexandre
Thanks for the reply.
Actually my setup is just like 1) zone delegation
Am 03.04.20 um 15:20 schrieb David Alexandre M. de Carvalho:
> Where can I find about alternatives to point 2?
in the part you quoted from me
> I have a windows subdomain configured in that way, never realized there
Hi!
Where can I find about alternatives to point 2?
I have a windows subdomain configured in that way, never realized there was a
better way.
Thanks and regards.
Os melhores cumprimentos
David Alexandre M. de Carvalho
---
Especialista de Informática
e
respective IP network. Can I use the same
Keypair in all of them?
3) Are the files /etc/named.root.key file and /etc/named.iscdlv.key already
being used? I compared them to the result
of the DNSKEY dig query but they are different.
Thank you so much for your time!
Best regards
d in recursive mode, i.e. your workstation uses
bind-9.11.7 as a caching nameserver to browse the internet, my laptop
suddenly started to make al lot more noise and was heating up
substantially. After going back to 9.11.6-P1 the heating of my laptop
also went away.
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RH
Hello,
I have two views configured, default (where the clients are first
matched or denied) and view2 where only some clients should match
(after being denied in default view match).
Only one zone "zone.com" is defined in view2, whereas default view has
all the other zones including "zone.com" a
, 13 May 2016 07:39:33 +0200
Subject: Re: installation issues
Am 13.05.2016 um 05:20 schrieb Rajesh M:
> @ tony finch
> your post helped me. thank you very much.
> i created a folder called c:\BindDNS and installed in that.
> it worked correctly
>
> is anybody on this list using bind
@lists.isc.org
Sent: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:32:42 +0100
Subject: Re: installation issues
Rajesh M <24x7ser...@24x7server.net> wrote:
>
> however after installation i am getting the same error as earlier
>
> The ISC BIND service failed to start due to the following error:
> ISC BIND
[mailto:b...@jubileegroup.co.uk]
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Sun, 8 May 2016 14:12:49 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: installation issues
Hi there,
On Sun, 8 May 2016, Rajesh M wrote:
> i am getting error this is not a valid win32 application.
I suspect that you've downloaded the wrong archiv
hi
i tried running the following bind versions on win 2008 r2 server
32 bit and 64 bit
9.9.9
9.10.4
i am getting error this is not a valid win32 application.
also i noted that plesk (parallels) uses BIND DNS Server 9.10.3-P4 (for
windows)
i could not see this version on the website of bind
hi ,
I noticed that at peak hours, BIND response time is relatively high for some
servers.non-cached query takes over 700msI set some kernel parameters to tune
the network and sockets for redhat 6 and set some global options to tune the
BIND by modifying the cache settings, but neither I get th
Wondering about IDN support for BIND.
UTF-8 character set?
Searched for these in this forum and didn't find much.
May have missed it.
Anything helpful already out there for review?
Thanks!
Martin Meadows
Indianapolis, IN
_
tks !!
On 6/14/13 1:21 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:10:47PM -0300, Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
>> thanks for the heads up. Do you have a estimated time of release for
>> 9.9.4 and 9.9.10 ?
> Every time I make predictions about dates, events conspire to make
&
Evan,
thanks for the heads up. Do you have a estimated time of release for
9.9.4 and 9.9.10 ?
Warm regards,
~Carlos
On 6/14/13 1:08 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:36:19PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> It's not built into bind (yet).
>
> Correct. For the record, it'll be in
You need to patch your 9.9.2 source code and recompile. Take a look at:
http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits
cheers,
~Carlos
On 6/14/13 11:27 AM, Manson, John wrote:
> We are running Bind 9.9.2 and would like to invoke the rate-limit option
> but named says ‘unknown option’.
>
> Do we need to
That's a neat trick, thanks Warren! I also do like prefixes, BTW (as can
be seen in the other thread referenced).
cheers!
~Carlos
On 6/5/13 2:46 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Narcis Garcia wrote:
>
>> It's not the only mailing list where I'm subscribed.
>> Could p
The 'hidden master' setup is a very good strategy for a number of reasons.
I think the original description only derails a bit when using the term
'authoritative':
> I'm being told "our authoritative DNS
>> servers should not receive any queries", as well as "DNS slaves
>> respond to quer
You need the soa record. It has to be empty but not THAT empty :-)
Sent from my iPad
On 20 May 2013, at 04:51, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> - Yes, I thought about not using DNS from the same internet provider,
> but wanted to know if there is a way to patch only the .local response.
>
> - This is th
On 5/8/13 10:53 PM, Michael McNally wrote:
> On 5/8/13 9:43 AM, Carlos M. martinez wrote:
>> Agreed, but, subject tagging is very useful for those who prefer to have
>> things hit your inbox first, before archiving. And there seems to be a
>> lot more agreement on the taggin
Agreed, but, subject tagging is very useful for those who prefer to have
things hit your inbox first, before archiving. And there seems to be a
lot more agreement on the tagging issue than on the reply to.
Out of dozens of MLs I'm subscribed to, this is the only one which does
not tag the subject,
And, If I might add, adding a tag to the subject like [bind-users] would
be extremely nice.
regards
~Carlos
On 5/8/13 12:02 PM, Steven Carr wrote:
> Any chance someone can correct the settings on this mailing list to
> reply to the list by default instead of the user posting the message?
>
> Th
I think views have mostly to do with the source of the queries, thus
presenting a different 'view' of zone data depending on who the client is.
You could have one view only with master zones and other view with salve
zones, but I'm not sure what the purpose would be, unless for example
you want to
That's stiff...
On 4/26/13 2:47 PM, rohan.he...@cwjamaica.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone say why Bind course offering appears so expensive? Is something
> else included in the package that is not specified?
>
> 2-Day Introduction to DNS & BIND Training
> Price: $1,795.00
>
> Rohan
> __
If nothing changes, only the SOA serial will be incremented on resign.
The signatures don't 'have' to be renewed every 30 days, you can resign
as often as you want / need.
regards
~Carlos
On 4/11/13 9:14 AM, hugo hugoo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone tell me why signatures in dnssec mut be ren
Looking at rndc stats output on an older BIND 9.3 nameserver versus output on a
new BIND 9.7 nameserver.
It seems that the 9.3 and 9.7 referrals and failures are flipped in rndc stats
output.
Does that make sense?
On the 9.3 nameserver I see a boatload of referrals and almost no failures.
On
the other options.
Looking forward to your thoughts.
~Carlos
On 4/3/13 7:48 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <515a92a5.3020...@imperial.ac.uk>, Phil Mayers writes:
>> On 04/01/2013 07:36 PM, Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
>>> Reframing the question in more general ter
Reframing the question in more general terms... Which events trigger a
zone re-sign and reload when using "auto-dnssec maintain" ?
regards,
~Carlos
On 4/1/13 12:04 PM, Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a few zones signed with DNSSEC and "autodnssec
Hello all,
I have a few zones signed with DNSSEC and "autodnssec maintain". I have
one particular zone that every now and then (I'm working on finding a
pattern or trigger)
This re-signing process runs for a while, incrementing the serial each
time and growing the journal until stopping.
I know
Thinking about this ... perhaps this is more to do with the behavior of BIND
9.3 versus BIND 9.7. Did the referral mechanism change? Here are my thoughts on
the subject:
Nameserver A is the authority for zone1.com and it is the authority for
sub.zone1.com. Sub.zone1.com is delegated from zone1.
Question about rndc referral data. Running BIND 9.3 on an older nameserver and
BIND 9.7 on a somewhat newer one. These 2 nameservers sit under a load balancer
and get an equal number of queries. While examing rndc output on the 2
nameservers I noticed that the older one does about 100 referrals
Are you talking about SOURCE or destination ports ?
regards
~CArlos
On 3/25/13 1:21 PM, babu dheen wrote:
> Hi Matus,
>
> Still not convinced because if i need to allow >1024 port from our DNS
> server to external world(internet).. where is the security?
>
> I beleive we just need to allow TC
Transport has nothing to do with content in DNS. If your client asks for
an record it will get the appropriate answer according to the
zone's records (a value or an error condition) regardless on whether the
query was made over IPv6 or IPv4.
That said, you can 'hack' around this expected beha
link-locals are not that special, with the exception of the %
decorator... other than that, they work exactly like any other address.
Bind/Apache/ will listen on link locals and
they can be used as route next-hops too.
regards,
~Carlos
On 3/22/13 1:13 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> I'm not sure what
We're seeing email failures to outlook.uga.edu.
dig uga.edu +nssearch shows only dns3.uga.edu responds with an soa record.
and
dig -t mx outlook.uga.edu @dns3.uga.edu returns an mx record.
outlook.uga.edu.86400 IN MX 10 707341637.mail.outlook.com.
And we see a proble
at 11:32 AM, M. Meadows wrote:
Recently noticed that for 2 nameservers ns1.tbd.com and ns2.tbd.com (names are
changed to protect the innocent) the first nameserver consistently receives
twice as many queries as the 2nd nameserver.
Who can tell me why queries are distributed this way?
I
They are authoritative nameservers.
Thanks for the reply!
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:12:51 -0500
From: lkc...@ksu.edu
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: question about dns query distribution
Are these authoritative nameservers or resolving DNS servers?
If the latter, its probably because
Recently noticed that for 2 nameservers ns1.tbd.com and ns2.tbd.com (names are
changed to protect the innocent) the first nameserver consistently receives
twice as many queries as the 2nd nameserver.
Who can tell me why queries are distributed this way?
Any ideas?
I assume it's something rel
Does anyone know why dig brownmackie.com +nssearch only returns 5 auth
nameserver soa records?
A check of whois shows they have 7 auth nameservers.
A dig -t NS brownmackie.com @ shows 7
nameservers are delegated authority for the domain.
Is this a limitation of +nssearch?
Can +nssearch only
Attempting to determine if a stub zone requires any kind of zone transfer.
Reading through online doc I find mixed opinions. Here's one:
…
Stub-Zones do receive their information by just querying DNS-Servers instead of
requesting a Zone-Transfer. You can even add Stub-Zones for Zones where
Z
On 9/18/2012 9:45 AM, M. Meadows wrote:
dig www.careerone.com.au +short @8.8.8.8
www.careerone.com.au.edgesuite.net.
a903.g.akamai.net.
208.44.23.99
208.44.23.121
Wh
Why / how does this work?
dig -t any www.careerone.com.au @ns2.tmpw.net.
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.2 <<>> -t any www.careerone.com.au
@ns2.tmpw.net.
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15513
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUER
om
>
>
> On 18 Sep 2012, at 14:45, M. Meadows wrote:
>
> > dig www.careerone.com.au +short @8.8.8.8
> > www.careerone.com.au.edgesuite.net.
> > a903.g.akamai.net.
> > 208.44.23.99
> > 208.44.23.121
> >
> > Why does the above dig work when
>
dig www.careerone.com.au +short @8.8.8.8
www.careerone.com.au.edgesuite.net.
a903.g.akamai.net.
208.44.23.99
208.44.23.121
Why does the above dig work when
dig careerone.com.au +nssearch @8.8.8.8
SOA dns0.news.com.au. hostmaster.news.com.au. 2012082200 3600 1200 86400 1200
from server usw1.ak
e file for
s6, it follows the NS records of the parent which happen to be the same name
server as s6. On the other hand, if you had attempted to master s6 on a
different name server, it would not have worked.
On 05/07/2012 12:32 PM, M. Meadows wrote:
So ... if we have
exacttarget.com de
So ... if we have
exacttarget.com delegated to ns1 and ns2.exacttarget.com nameservers
and ... we manage the s6.exacttarget.com zone file from ns1 and
ns2.exacttarget.com
but we don't delegate s6 in the exacttarget.com zone file ... forgot to enter
it in the zone file ...
how is it
/12 20:39, Computer King wrote:
OK but how do I correct the issue
Sent from my Nexus 1
Sten Carlsen wrote:
It has sometimes been seen that the files that are updated are not the
files actually loaded, this could be such a case?
On 29/03/12 10:58, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
Hello all i have wha
xfr= zone @master
> Sten Carlsen wrote:
>
> It has sometimes been seen that the files that are updated are not the
> files actually loaded, this could be such a case?
>
> On 29/03/12 10:58, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> >
> > Hello all i have what is to me
Hello all i have what is to me a very strange bind 9 master slave transfer
issue.
When i update a zone file on the master the file updates correctly the notifies
are sent and every thing seems to work perfectly except it transfers 0 bytes to
the slave. Checking the slave confirms that i
Hello all i have what is to me a very strange bind 9 master slave transfer
issue.
When i update a zone file on the master the file updates correctly the notifies
are sent and every thing seems to work perfectly except it transfers 0 bytes to
the slave. Checking the slave confirms that indeed t
Thanks to both of you for your feedback.
I see the rrset ordering explanation in the arm.
Good information.
> To: sun-g...@live.com
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: dig -t txt output variation
> From: wbr...@e1b.org
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:54:47 -0500
>
> sun-guru wrote on 03
We've noticed that the following command gets a variable result:
dig -t txt exacttarget.com @ns2.exacttarget.com +short
We get 2 results from this. Seems to be somewhat random. They are:
"v=spf1 a mx ip4:207.250.79.101 ip4:207.67.98.192/27 ip4:72.18.216.98
include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com inc
Mmmm ... nevermind. Nothing wrong with the delegation. The
e.hushpuppies-australia.com zone file isn't set up yet! Sorry.
From: sun-g...@live.com
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: what's wrong with the e.hushpuppies-australia.com delegation
@ns.domainnetwork.se ?
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 20
dig -t any e.hushpuppies-australia.com @ns.domainnetwork.se
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 <<>> -t any
e.hushpuppies-australia.com @ns.domainnetwork.se
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 19181
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY:
thanks for the helpful feedback guys!
> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:14:55 -0600
> From: d...@maplepark.com
> To: sun-g...@live.com
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: variable dig results
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, M. Meadows wrote:
>
> >
> >
>
Wondering why we get variable results from the following command:dig
eftc.thehartford.com
(sometimes we get authority section and additional section feedback ...
sometimes we don't)
Usually we see the following:
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 <<>> eftc.thehartford.com
;;
Just wondering why dig with nssearch and "@" produced two different answers
when I ran it today.
I assume the @8.8.8.8 (in the example below) isn't actually happening ... or it
happened in one test and not the other.
The results below were exactly as I saw them in the order that they are lis
Le dimanche 11 septembre 2011 23:35, vous avez écrit :
> On 11/09/2011 21:00, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
> > I also think the creation of the reverse zone ipv6
> >
> > i dont know how to
>
> IPv6 reverse zones work in very much the same way as IPv4 reverse zones.
>
Le dimanche 11 septembre 2011 20:16, SM a écrit :
> At 11:01 11-09-2011, Sten Carlsen wrote:
> >If I do: dig d6.s-carlsen.dk (d6 is the host in question, it has
>
> If the type argument is not supplied, dig will perform a lookup for
> an A record.
>
> dig d6.s-carlsen.dk
>
> Regards,
> -sm
More specifically :
Don't understand why dig spinsix.com +nssearch @8.8.8.8 times out
xtinunixadmin01 : host -t any spinsix.com 8.8.8.8
Using domain server:
Name: 8.8.8.8
Address: 8.8.8.8#53
Aliases:
spinsix.com has SOA record ns63.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2011080600
28800 7200 604
Seeing some flakey feedback from spinsix.com domain today.
dig spinsix.com +nssearch ... times out or fails.
Is that domain borked?
Thanks,
Martin Meadows
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listi
Hi,
The problem is that fail-over between A records is not standard and
might/might not work with various SIP clients. On the other hand SRV in
my opinion has been designed with that in mind, that's why the
additional complexity with 2 SRV records.
Thanks & Regards,
*Amani*
On 7/20/2011
;
>
> In message <4dfa62ca.7060...@gmail.com>, David Sparro writes:
> > On 6/15/2011 7:41 PM, M. Meadows wrote:
> > >
> > > The DNS admins at thehartford.com seem to feel that this nameserver
> > > mismatch is working as expected.
> > >
> &
.com
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: question about thehartford.com domain
>
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, M. Meadows wrote:
>
> > Question : our check of whois indicates that ns1.thehartford.com and
> > ns2.thehartford.com are
> > the authori
thehartford.com domain
>
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, M. Meadows wrote:
>
> > Question : our check of whois indicates that ns1.thehartford.com and
> > ns2.thehartford.com are
> > the authoritative nameservers for thehartford.com. A dig with a +trace for
> > eftc.
Good morning.
We sent the following email to the dns managers at thehartford.com this morning:
-
Hi. We’re experiencing some issues with address record lookups for
eftc.thehartford.com. We’ve got a coupl
So I'm been having dns issues for a while, differing issues that pop
up and I knock them down , but another just came to my attention which
has me stumped.
My external zone config has allow-recursion ( none; );
However I have some 3rd party sites that I CNAME too. Akamai for
example, yes CNAME to
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
>> Odds are good this is a software bug in BIND.
>
> I can absolutely confirm that this is a bug in BIND 9; we're aware of
> it and have been trying to reproduce it for some time. Unfortunately
> it seems to be triggered by some environmental cond
Can someone tell me the cause of the "not exact" error and how to troubleshoot?
21-Mar-2011 11:01:24.931 xfer-in: error: transfer of '219.130.IN-ADDR.ARPA/IN'
from
130.219.31.5#53: failed while receiving responses: not exact
After this message appears, a retry on the transfer runs error free.
Th
> So that was the trace between the client and the nameserver. What
> about the trace between the nameserver and the rest of the world?
>
> The log message is trigger by multiple queries from your nameserver
> not being answered and named falling back simpler queries in a
> attempt to get them ans
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Tory M. Blue:
>
>> [tblue@mx3 ~]$ dig @problemserver.net www.yahoo.com +trace
>
> Please use "dig @problemserver.net www.yahoo.com +trace +norecurse
> +dnssec", to match more closely the queires that BIND
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article SNIPPED<
> www.yahoo.com. 300 IN CNAME fp.wg1.b.yahoo.com.
>
> And even when they did, it didn't get involved until you followed the
> CNAME returned for www.yahoo.com. Your log message above indicates an
> issue just with th
Second email in a single day, crazy. But I've had issues backing up
and just need to resolve them
Again Bind bind-9.7.2-P3 behind F5 Loadbalancers.
I'm running into an issue where one of the 2 servers will resolve
www.yahoo.com but the other will not (Same network), but both will
resolve yahoo.c
Hey all,
Well I'm reaching out as I'm at a loss. I have a distributed DNS
architecture with 2 bind-9.7.2-P3 servers behind an F5 Loadbalancer. I
then have another 2 behind another F5 at another location.
My app servers are configured with their resolv.conf looking like:
(please ignore the domain
are seeing ... where dig on
fqdn fails until we do dig with +nssearch on the domain?
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:57:33 +
> From: d...@dotat.at
> To: sun-g...@live.com
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: odd dig results for fqdn
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2
: dig mta.news.getaroomgetadeal.com +noall +answer @4.2.2.1
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 <<>>
mta.news.getaroomgetadeal.com +noall +answer @4.2.2.1
;; global options: printcmd
: dig news.getaroomgetadeal.com +nssearch @4.2.2.1
SOA ns1.exacttarget.com. hostmaster.exacttarget.
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
