On Fri, 23 Aug 2024, Edwardo Garcia wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 21:57:47 +1000 > From: Edwardo Garcia <wdgar...@gmail.com> > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: 9.18 horrendous
to claim that 9.18 is horrendous is not a good verdict for this sofware and ISC in general. I personnally recommend to use and install this version which can be found on Ubuntu 22.04.04 LTS : stock@vax-linux:~$ dpkg -l bind9 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-==============-==========================-============-====================> ii bind9 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 amd64 Internet Domain Name> stock@vax-linux:~$ It's unfortunate that the official maintainer Ond�?ej Sur <ond...@isc.org> is not recognizing good and stable versions and putting warning lables out on beta and alpha versions. The lead developer apparently does not discrmiminate between good versions and beta versions. That he instead then starts to dismcriminate between people who are "good and stable" persons and "beta and alpha" persons is unfortunate. "We welcome any bug reports, but such language is not welcome here. The mailing list is not meant for insulting developers" Agreed there is no room for insulting developers. Removing a user from this list is IMHO not the best way to treat an issue. > > I am going to vent, I have bitten my tongue for far too long. > > I've just updated 9.18 again, as recent update, and ever since using this > 9.18 mess the load has been horrendous never ever have I experiemnce such a > clusterfcsk of a release > > 14 minutes after restart bind load is greater than 8 and still climbing, > CPU neigh on 400% but next to none memory usage, this is typical of all > 9.18, and is far beyond any joke. > > 21:42:36 up 117 days, 7:35, 1 user, load average: 8.15, 6.48, 3.32 > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 1043 named 20 0 180368 21756 7664 S 398.0 0.3 31:52.91 named > > google sees you admit this problem is known, but yet allowed this minor > (18) to go production available with this stupidity problem, and we do not > have that many domains hosted, about 1300, we never had this with 9.16, > 9.14, 9.12, 9...... yet ISC seems intent on driving system administrators > away to alternative with stupidity like this, do you think we are going to > tolerate such mess forever, sadly mistaken, I know of other local admin who > moved to unbound because of this, I hope we are not next, but I suspect we > will be. > > vent over. > -- Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist crashrecovery.org st...@stokkie.net -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
