My mail setup is as limited as my eyesight. As I mentioned, I have emails in my inbox and filter afterwards in order to keep mbox size at reasonable levels. In this way I don't forget to check this or that folder.
While on inbox I filter by looking at the tags. Works really well and I know quite a few people who do the same. I counted and I'm subscribed to over 50 mailing lists and this is the only one which does not tag the subject. Probably you've discussed this in the past (I'm a rather new subscriber), so I apologize for bringing up a dead horse. regards, Carlos On 5/8/13 10:53 PM, Michael McNally wrote: > On 5/8/13 9:43 AM, Carlos M. martinez wrote: >> Agreed, but, subject tagging is very useful for those who prefer to have >> things hit your inbox first, before archiving. And there seems to be a >> lot more agreement on the tagging issue than on the reply to. > > Unless your mail setup is extremely restricted in what it can filter > on, you have several choices of header which can be used by an > automated filter to detect and classify appropriately according to list. > > Personally I have procmail file bind-users traffic based on the > "List-Id:" header, but I realize you may be in a different environment > with different tools available.) > > List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org> > > Michael McNally > ISC Support > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
