Am 04.11.2023 um 19:41:44 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users: > Thanks for the reply. Interesting. > Option A - It works but I would like to stop maintaining two > different servers with the same data. > Option B - I have no chance of getting the company to agree to IPv6.
Then you are in a stonehenge company. Tell them about the problem and that relying on IPv4 creates additional work. My recommendation: Let the people who refuse IPv6 do the DNS work if possible. :-) > Option G - Yes it would be trivial with DNSMasq internally. I don't > think I have any chance of pushing this through. Also DNSMasq does > not support replication (but it could be scripted). Is it possible to use dnsmasq as the master (does it support zone transfer?) and bind as a slave? -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
